Tractor
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Mention Arunachal,maybe western frontier should be concern,Kamet peak is really beautiful,it is in India?
Why Congress wants to forget 1962 Indo-China war
- Thread starter ajtr
- Start date
yaa china already occupies Aksai chin .. western frontier is also a concern ...
yes the Kamet Peak is in Utrakhand state of India.. bordering Tibet agained occupied by china
... still PRC wants more... W H Y ???
Tractor
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
For PRG has nothing,nothing to lose in a war.yaa china already occupies Aksai chin .. western frontier is also a concern ...
yes the Kamet Peak is in Utrakhand state of India.. bordering Tibet agained occupied by china
They do understand, they are just taking it out on cyber space. Life for most Chinese and Indians is not light as feather.
Indians worry about Chinese being aggressive, Chinese worry about Indians being used as a pawn by the US. We might not like each other per se, but the mutural hatred or fear, which is a key component in a full-scale war, is not there, at least not to my knowledge.
but you cant trust a Authoritarian Govt like china...
chinese ppl may not be in favor still PRC will do wat it wants,,,, and it will be bad day for India and China both ... after 100s of years our two civilizations has got a chance to rise again to their glory ... and PRC by claiming Arunachal is going towards a dark future..
Tractor
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
rise again is India's affair.China never rose but always full of brainless people.
free east Turkmenistan and Tibet ... that will settle the issue...call part of xizang 'Arunachal' settles everything, yeah
and a tibetan liar can't face truth
Republic of China govt is rightful owner of Mainland ...
East Turkmenistan, Tibet, Inner Mongolia.. should be free from the hands of arrogant PRC ...
Tractor
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
free east Turkmenistan and Tibet ... that will settle the issue...
Republic of China govt is rightful owner of Mainland ...
East Turkmenistan, Tibet, Inner Mongolia.. should be free from the hands of arrogant PRC ...
Should be but could not be.
chengdusudise
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2010
- Messages
- 345
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
sorry, indian ocean is under the control of american navy.
same the case with Arunachal and Kashmir ...
---------- Post added at 08:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 PM ----------
also the south china sea ...
and pacificfree east Turkmenistan and Tibet ... that will settle the issue...
Republic of China govt is rightful owner of Mainland ...
East Turkmenistan, Tibet, Inner Mongolia.. should be free from the hands of arrogant PRC ...
Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
India is standing ON peace suffocating it to death
Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
This is just to correct some misapprehensions, not to enter the thread in general.
No, indeed, there is no incentive to take back any real estate in Aksai Chin.
It is of value, strategic value, only to PRC.
Indian parliamentary experts have to figure out a way to 'cede' territory to another country in case of a peace treaty that permanently transfers Aksai Chin to PRC.
No, there is no way that Tibet can be controlled by India if India regains complete access to Aksai Chin.
Look at the maps.
The population centres in Tibet are mainly concentrated in southern Tibet (not what is known as south Tibet in current diplomatic speak, but the Xigatse Lhasa belt) and eastern Tibet, what used to be known as Kham. Northern and central Tibet are essentially barren.
Aksai Chin gives convenient road access to the populated zone between Xigatse and Manasarovar to the Chinese Military Region of Lanzhou. Strangely, because of the layout of the land, it is relatively easy to get to southern Tibet from Xinjiang, and if the approaches from Qing Hai through Kham are blocked by hostile irregulars, as they were when the PRC wanted to move in, the Xinjiang route may have been a convenient way to get around using comparatively less stiffly contested terrain.
I am saying this without knowledge of the detailed deployment of the PLA in 1959. This is subject to verification.
So Aksai Chin matters to China, it doesn't matter to India.
No, indeed, there is no incentive to take back any real estate in Aksai Chin.
It is of value, strategic value, only to PRC.
Indian parliamentary experts have to figure out a way to 'cede' territory to another country in case of a peace treaty that permanently transfers Aksai Chin to PRC.
No, there is no way that Tibet can be controlled by India if India regains complete access to Aksai Chin.
Look at the maps.
The population centres in Tibet are mainly concentrated in southern Tibet (not what is known as south Tibet in current diplomatic speak, but the Xigatse Lhasa belt) and eastern Tibet, what used to be known as Kham. Northern and central Tibet are essentially barren.
Aksai Chin gives convenient road access to the populated zone between Xigatse and Manasarovar to the Chinese Military Region of Lanzhou. Strangely, because of the layout of the land, it is relatively easy to get to southern Tibet from Xinjiang, and if the approaches from Qing Hai through Kham are blocked by hostile irregulars, as they were when the PRC wanted to move in, the Xinjiang route may have been a convenient way to get around using comparatively less stiffly contested terrain.
I am saying this without knowledge of the detailed deployment of the PLA in 1959. This is subject to verification.
So Aksai Chin matters to China, it doesn't matter to India.
Similar threads
- Article
