What's new

Why China's nuclear plans in Pakistan draw global criticism

yusheng

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
1,672
Reaction score
6
Energy/Environment Energy Voices ;;

Why China's nuclear plans in Pakistan draw global criticism - CSMonitor.com

Why China's nuclear plans in Pakistan draw global criticism

China’s decision to build nuclear reactors in Pakistan has received criticism for defying international norms on nuclear technologies trade.

By Nick Cunningham, OilPrice.com March 11, 2015
16809667_827861.jpg


Cables hang from a pole-mounted transformer in a low income neighborhood in Karachi.Akhtar Soomro/Reuters/FileView Caption
China has decided to defy international norms and build new nuclear reactors in Pakistan.

While the U.S. and Europe see stagnant growth for commercial nuclear power, the same is not true in Asia. China is not only building nuclear reactors at home, but it is exporting its technology abroad. Of particular concern is its construction of nuclear reactors in Pakistan. China helped build two reactors at Chashma, which came online in 2000 and 2011 respectively. More recently, it has decided to double the size of the Chashma power plant, with two additional reactors under construction. And it is also constructing a new nuclear power plant near Karachi, using China’s next generation ACP-1000 design.

But China’s plans in Pakistan are facing global criticism.

The problem is that Pakistan is not a signatory of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), which should disqualify it for any international help in building nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a coalition of nuclear technology exporting countries who have banded together to create guidelines and norms around the sale of nuclear technology in order to ensure its safe use while guarding against the spread of nuclear weapons capabilities. One of the core tenets of the NSG is to not trade nuclear technology to countries that have not signed up to the NPT. Pakistan is one of the world’s four remaining holdouts to the NPT (the other three are India, Israel, and South Sudan).

That is why China’s decision to build nuclear reactors in Pakistan has received criticism. As a member of the NSG, China is defying the guidelines on nuclear trade. China says that its promise to Pakistan predates its 2004 accession to the suppliers group.


The two reactors under construction near Karachi will provide Pakistan with 2.2 gigawatts of nuclear capacity, a vital lifeline for a country suffering an acute energy crisis. But the project is sited a mere 20 miles from a city with over 20 million people, which is sparking opposition among Karachi residents. Activists sued to stop construction of power plant. It broke ground at the end of 2013, but a judge suspended construction in December 2014 until a new environmental assessment could be obtained. That is expected to be issued within the next month.

The U.S. has voiced some opposition to China’s involvement in Pakistan as well. “China’s expanding civilian nuclear cooperation with Pakistan raises concerns and we urge China to be transparent regarding this cooperation,” the U.S. Embassy said in a statement. U.S. intelligence from the 1990’s found that China was likely a “principle supplier” to Pakistan for its undeclared nuclear weapons program, a major factor in American skepticism towards China’s current relationship with Pakistan.

The U.S. has also raised concerns because, unlike Pakistan’s earlier reactors which were grandfathered in as they predated China’s joining the NSG, the new reactors near Karachi amount to a more blatant breach of NSG protocol. China has confirmed its plans for six reactors and says that it will probably build more. However, the U.S. does not have a firm leg to stand on, with its credibility tarnished after having pushed through an exemption for India – another non-signatory of the NPT – to allow American firms to export nuclear technology.

But beyond breach of international protocol, the construction of nuclear reactors in Karachi has raised safety concerns. The threat of terrorism in such an unstable country worries not only U.S. diplomats, but Pakistani civil society as well. The head of a Karachi-based non-profit questioned Pakistan’s ability to safely operate the new reactors in an interview with The Washington Post, citing prior nuclear disasters in the U.S., Soviet Union, and Japan. “Those are three highly advanced countries,” Karamat Ali of the Pakistan Institute for Labor Education and Research said. “This is Pakistan. We don’t live on technology and science. In fact, we are quite allergic to that.” China insists the technology is safe, citing the International Atomic Energy Agency’s completed safety review in January.

Still, for a city that is no stranger to cyclones or earthquakes, a natural disaster could spark a nuclear catastrophe. Any sort of emergency situation would be a nightmare because of the power plant’s proximity to the megalopolis of Karachi. With only a few dozen fire trucks on hand, a handful of public hospitals, the capacity of the city to respond to such a situation is uncertain. “You couldn’t even dream of evacuating Karachi,” Pakistani nuclear physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy told the Post. “The minute an alarm was sounded, everything would be choked up. There would be murder and mayhem because people would be trying to flee.”
 
Still, for a city that is no stranger to cyclones or earthquakes
When did last time Karachi was wiped of because of any natural disaster....Pakistanis give shit to any paid tom dick and harry who are against reactor construction....
 
China will build more reactors for Pakistan friends, no matter whoever unhappy.
 
Meh, they may criticize as they wish. Logically speaking, why would they worry about building nuclear plant in Pakistan? It already has nuclear capacity. My guess is that aside from the standard "criticize China for anything it does", it is also an attempt to leverage political advantage over Pakistan. Let's face it, there is no sane reason for Pakistan to give up its nuclear capacity and if you can somehow link that to Pakistan's access to nuclear energy, then you get a very useful political leverage.

Though, I am very curious how the US spokesperson criticized China with a straight face. It is like pot calling kettle black. Didn't US build a few nuclear reactors in India? (which is another NPT non-signatories)
 
Meh, they may criticize as they wish. Logically speaking, why would they worry about building nuclear plant in Pakistan? It already has nuclear capacity. My guess is that aside from the standard "criticize China for anything it does", it is also an attempt to leverage political advantage over Pakistan. Let's face it, there is no sane reason for Pakistan to give up its nuclear capacity and if you can somehow link that to Pakistan's access to nuclear energy, then you get a very useful political leverage.

Though, I am very curious how the US spokesperson criticized China with a straight face. It is like pot calling kettle black. Didn't US build a few nuclear reactors in India? (which is another NPT non-signatories)

I don't think US build any reactor in India :?
 
Every one has the rights for clean energy . So does Pakistan Srilanka veitnam etc.
India will support peaceful nuclear programme for our friends in Srilanka and then to veitnam , Taiwan
 
Energy/Environment Energy Voices ;;

Why China's nuclear plans in Pakistan draw global criticism - CSMonitor.com

Why China's nuclear plans in Pakistan draw global criticism

China’s decision to build nuclear reactors in Pakistan has received criticism for defying international norms on nuclear technologies trade.

By Nick Cunningham, OilPrice.com March 11, 2015
View attachment 203909

Cables hang from a pole-mounted transformer in a low income neighborhood in Karachi.Akhtar Soomro/Reuters/FileView Caption
China has decided to defy international norms and build new nuclear reactors in Pakistan.

While the U.S. and Europe see stagnant growth for commercial nuclear power, the same is not true in Asia. China is not only building nuclear reactors at home, but it is exporting its technology abroad. Of particular concern is its construction of nuclear reactors in Pakistan. China helped build two reactors at Chashma, which came online in 2000 and 2011 respectively. More recently, it has decided to double the size of the Chashma power plant, with two additional reactors under construction. And it is also constructing a new nuclear power plant near Karachi, using China’s next generation ACP-1000 design.

But China’s plans in Pakistan are facing global criticism.

The problem is that Pakistan is not a signatory of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), which should disqualify it for any international help in building nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a coalition of nuclear technology exporting countries who have banded together to create guidelines and norms around the sale of nuclear technology in order to ensure its safe use while guarding against the spread of nuclear weapons capabilities. One of the core tenets of the NSG is to not trade nuclear technology to countries that have not signed up to the NPT. Pakistan is one of the world’s four remaining holdouts to the NPT (the other three are India, Israel, and South Sudan).

That is why China’s decision to build nuclear reactors in Pakistan has received criticism. As a member of the NSG, China is defying the guidelines on nuclear trade. China says that its promise to Pakistan predates its 2004 accession to the suppliers group.


The two reactors under construction near Karachi will provide Pakistan with 2.2 gigawatts of nuclear capacity, a vital lifeline for a country suffering an acute energy crisis. But the project is sited a mere 20 miles from a city with over 20 million people, which is sparking opposition among Karachi residents. Activists sued to stop construction of power plant. It broke ground at the end of 2013, but a judge suspended construction in December 2014 until a new environmental assessment could be obtained. That is expected to be issued within the next month.

The U.S. has voiced some opposition to China’s involvement in Pakistan as well. “China’s expanding civilian nuclear cooperation with Pakistan raises concerns and we urge China to be transparent regarding this cooperation,” the U.S. Embassy said in a statement. U.S. intelligence from the 1990’s found that China was likely a “principle supplier” to Pakistan for its undeclared nuclear weapons program, a major factor in American skepticism towards China’s current relationship with Pakistan.

The U.S. has also raised concerns because, unlike Pakistan’s earlier reactors which were grandfathered in as they predated China’s joining the NSG, the new reactors near Karachi amount to a more blatant breach of NSG protocol. China has confirmed its plans for six reactors and says that it will probably build more. However, the U.S. does not have a firm leg to stand on, with its credibility tarnished after having pushed through an exemption for India – another non-signatory of the NPT – to allow American firms to export nuclear technology.

But beyond breach of international protocol, the construction of nuclear reactors in Karachi has raised safety concerns. The threat of terrorism in such an unstable country worries not only U.S. diplomats, but Pakistani civil society as well. The head of a Karachi-based non-profit questioned Pakistan’s ability to safely operate the new reactors in an interview with The Washington Post, citing prior nuclear disasters in the U.S., Soviet Union, and Japan. “Those are three highly advanced countries,” Karamat Ali of the Pakistan Institute for Labor Education and Research said. “This is Pakistan. We don’t live on technology and science. In fact, we are quite allergic to that.” China insists the technology is safe, citing the International Atomic Energy Agency’s completed safety review in January.

Still, for a city that is no stranger to cyclones or earthquakes, a natural disaster could spark a nuclear catastrophe. Any sort of emergency situation would be a nightmare because of the power plant’s proximity to the megalopolis of Karachi. With only a few dozen fire trucks on hand, a handful of public hospitals, the capacity of the city to respond to such a situation is uncertain. “You couldn’t even dream of evacuating Karachi,” Pakistani nuclear physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy told the Post. “The minute an alarm was sounded, everything would be choked up. There would be murder and mayhem because people would be trying to flee.”


Further to the article, here are some progress:
  • Currently China-PK are using the CNP300 from CNNC (China National Nuclear Company).
  • For Romania (Cernavoda 3&4) it will be CANDU 6 from CGN (China General Nuclear)
  • In 2012, ACP1000 of CNNC and ACPR1000 of CGN were merged into one standardized design - the Hualong One - which will the generation III / III+ standard. For Argentina and Pakistan's next phase, the planned version will be Hualong One.
  • In November 2014 State Nuclear Power Technology Corporation (SNPTC) signed an agreement with Turkey’s utility EUAS and Westinghouse to begin exclusive negotiations to develop and construct a four-unit nuclear power plant in Turkey.
  • In December 2014 SNPTC signed two agreements in South Africa with a view to nuclear power plant construction, and CNNC signed another there
CGNPC-haolong-1.jpg

CGN-reactors-compared.jpg

Other than politics, market competition is probably a major reason behind such criticism. Other than China (CNNC. CGN), only 6 other countries i.e. US (Westinghouse, GE), Canada (Candu), Japan (Hitachi, Mitsubishi, Toshiba), Russia, South Korea and France (Areva, previously Framatone) can provide advanced reactors, and even fewer go on generation IV designs. Below is a list of world's advanced reactors and its providers.

Untitled.png


World Nuclear Association
Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors | Generation III+ Nuclear Reactors
 
Last edited:
India is not a signatory to NPT either, so their criticism is unfounded.
 
Correct the US has not built any Indian Nuclear reactors. Only in January was any agreement on it reached.

Sure, I will put in the corrections. "Though, I am very curious how the US spokesperson criticized China with a straight face. It is like pot calling kettle black. US will be building a few nuclear reactors in India. (which is another NPT non-signatories)"
 
Correct the US has not built any Indian Nuclear reactors. Only in January was any agreement on it reached.
But USA did make an exception to India, giving it access to NSG despite not being a signatory to NPT.
 
The key problem is who said this. OilPrice.com? That is quite clear, why.
 
Every one has the rights for clean energy . So does Pakistan Srilanka veitnam etc.
India will support peaceful nuclear programme for our friends in Srilanka and then to veitnam , Taiwan

good luck, first stabilize grid in India, 2nd, make sure Vietnam can afford it.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom