What's new

Why China’s Bid To Become A Superpower Is Doomed To Failure

Get Ya Wig Split

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
2,585
Reaction score
-2
Country
United States
Location
United States

Why China’s Bid To Become A Superpower Is Doomed To Failure​


1692996350272.png


Contrary to popular perception, America’s two major political parties do not disagree about everything. When it comes to China, there is a bipartisan consensus that Beijing is America’s most important rival for global power.

That finding became the main focus of US military planning in 2018 when the Trump administration issued a new national defense strategy, stating that China “seeks Indo-Pacific regional hegemony in the near-term and displacement of the United States to achieve global preeminence in the future.”

Said differently, Beijing seeks to become a superpower that matches and then surpasses America in its mastery of the forces driving global influence.

This is no longer breaking news. The Chinese government has been openly stating its aspirations for years, and has made steady progress towards becoming the dominant economic and military power in the Western Pacific.

However, the rest of the world began pushing back as Beijing became more assertive. In addition, longstanding contradictions in Chinese domestic policy have begun to take a toll on Beijing’s plans. It now looks unlikely that China will ever attain America’s level of power in the world. Look at the data.

Economy. America, with 4% of the world’s population, currently generates about 25% of global GDP. That is the same share of global wealth it generated in 1990. China, with nearly a fifth of the world’s population, generates about 18% of global GDP.

That makes China a middle-income nation. Its per capita generation of wealth, about $13,000 annually, is roughly a sixth of America’s $76,000. So while China is the world’s second biggest economy, it only ranks 64th globally in per capita GDP.

The country’s ability to grow fast in the future is doubtful. The Wall Street Journal, noting extensive signs of decay in the Chinese economy, stated in a front-page headline on August 20 that “China’s 40-Year Boom Is Over.” It went on to cite sources such as the International Monetary Fund that project an annual growth rate through 2030 in the 2-3% range.

Demography. French mathematician and philosopher Auguste Comte is widely credited with coining the phrase, “demography is destiny.” By that measure, China’s future looks bleak, because it is aging faster than any other nation thanks to a government policy from 1979 to 2015 that allowed each family to have only one child.

The year the one-child policy became law, the average age of China’s population was 20. In 2024 it will reach 40. According to current projections, by mid-century 39% of China’s citizens will be beyond retirement age, saddling the society with a huge burden of caring for the elderly.

This problem is not going to fix itself, because Chinese women have stopped having babies. As of 2022, the fertility rate averaged 1.1—barely half the 2.1 babies per woman needed to stabilize the population. The challenge of a shrinking workforce is exacerbated by the government’s suppression of women’s rights; no women serve on the ruling Politburo.

Diplomacy. Chinese officials complain that Washington is trying to contain China’s growth. It’s true. The Biden administration has made strengthening US alliances the centerpiece of its strategy for the Indo-Pacific, and Beijing’s abrasive diplomacy has aided the administration in its efforts.

Many of China’s neighbors, from Australia to India to Japan to the Philippines to South Korea, have taken firm stances in opposition to Beijing’s policies. Beijing’s embrace of Russia following the invasion of Ukraine has resulted in unprecedented cooperation between European NATO nations and US allies in the Pacific.

Even Germany, which in the past has sought to avoid tensions with Beijing to protect its commercial interests, has now issued a strategy document describing China as a “systemic rival.” The Ukraine debacle has made Moscow more favorably disposed to Beijing, but like China’s other friends, Russia looks more like a dependency than an ally.

Security. China generates about 13% of global military spending. The United States, at 39%, spends three times more. Even after correcting for purchasing-power disparities, it is clear that the Biden administration’s request for $886 billion in defense spending during the fiscal year commencing October 1 will dwarf Beijing’s level of effort.

The People’s Liberation Army has not seen significant combat since it fought Vietnam in 1979, and thus its performance in conflicts is uncertain. America’s joint force, in contrast, has been continuously engaged in overseas military action since 9/11. Although Beijing speaks occasionally of trying to seize Taiwan by force, it lacks the wherewithal to do so and fears the consequences of confrontation with America. Washington is aiding Taipei in its buildup of defensive forces, including most recently the sale of precision targeting devices for F-16 fighters.

Critics of China in Washington frequently express alarm at the pace of Beijing’s naval shipbuilding program, but a handful of US bombers equipped with stealthy antiship missiles would make quick work of the Chinese fleet in a war. Washington and its allies are steadily increasing their investment in technology needed to track and target shipping in the region.

Technology. China’s economic growth over the last four decades has been enabled more by cheap labor than advanced technology. Now that the availability of low-cost labor is waning, Beijing needs to grow its indigenous technology base. However, China tends to perform better in industrial activities than in leveraging the potential of the software-driven digital revolution.

The Biden administration intends to keep it that way by limiting the availability of chipmaking technology, blocking access to cloud computing services, and pressuring companies to limit their China tech investments. MicrosoftMSFT +1%, a big employer of software engineers in Beijing and Shanghai, has recently moved to shift its Chinese talent offshore.

I could go on to address the reserve-currency dominance of the dollar and other sources of US strength, but the bottom line is that China probably will never match America’s power, much less surpass it. A combination of smart policies in Washington and deep-seated defects in China precludes the Middle Kingdom from ever being a true superpower.

 
.
I don't know whether the thesis is true, but the author's argument is pure applesauce.
 
. .

Why China’s Bid To Become A Superpower Is Doomed To Failure​


View attachment 948641

Contrary to popular perception, America’s two major political parties do not disagree about everything. When it comes to China, there is a bipartisan consensus that Beijing is America’s most important rival for global power.

That finding became the main focus of US military planning in 2018 when the Trump administration issued a new national defense strategy, stating that China “seeks Indo-Pacific regional hegemony in the near-term and displacement of the United States to achieve global preeminence in the future.”

Said differently, Beijing seeks to become a superpower that matches and then surpasses America in its mastery of the forces driving global influence.

This is no longer breaking news. The Chinese government has been openly stating its aspirations for years, and has made steady progress towards becoming the dominant economic and military power in the Western Pacific.

However, the rest of the world began pushing back as Beijing became more assertive. In addition, longstanding contradictions in Chinese domestic policy have begun to take a toll on Beijing’s plans. It now looks unlikely that China will ever attain America’s level of power in the world. Look at the data.

Economy. America, with 4% of the world’s population, currently generates about 25% of global GDP. That is the same share of global wealth it generated in 1990. China, with nearly a fifth of the world’s population, generates about 18% of global GDP.

That makes China a middle-income nation. Its per capita generation of wealth, about $13,000 annually, is roughly a sixth of America’s $76,000. So while China is the world’s second biggest economy, it only ranks 64th globally in per capita GDP.

The country’s ability to grow fast in the future is doubtful. The Wall Street Journal, noting extensive signs of decay in the Chinese economy, stated in a front-page headline on August 20 that “China’s 40-Year Boom Is Over.” It went on to cite sources such as the International Monetary Fund that project an annual growth rate through 2030 in the 2-3% range.

Demography. French mathematician and philosopher Auguste Comte is widely credited with coining the phrase, “demography is destiny.” By that measure, China’s future looks bleak, because it is aging faster than any other nation thanks to a government policy from 1979 to 2015 that allowed each family to have only one child.

The year the one-child policy became law, the average age of China’s population was 20. In 2024 it will reach 40. According to current projections, by mid-century 39% of China’s citizens will be beyond retirement age, saddling the society with a huge burden of caring for the elderly.

This problem is not going to fix itself, because Chinese women have stopped having babies. As of 2022, the fertility rate averaged 1.1—barely half the 2.1 babies per woman needed to stabilize the population. The challenge of a shrinking workforce is exacerbated by the government’s suppression of women’s rights; no women serve on the ruling Politburo.

Diplomacy. Chinese officials complain that Washington is trying to contain China’s growth. It’s true. The Biden administration has made strengthening US alliances the centerpiece of its strategy for the Indo-Pacific, and Beijing’s abrasive diplomacy has aided the administration in its efforts.

Many of China’s neighbors, from Australia to India to Japan to the Philippines to South Korea, have taken firm stances in opposition to Beijing’s policies. Beijing’s embrace of Russia following the invasion of Ukraine has resulted in unprecedented cooperation between European NATO nations and US allies in the Pacific.

Even Germany, which in the past has sought to avoid tensions with Beijing to protect its commercial interests, has now issued a strategy document describing China as a “systemic rival.” The Ukraine debacle has made Moscow more favorably disposed to Beijing, but like China’s other friends, Russia looks more like a dependency than an ally.

Security. China generates about 13% of global military spending. The United States, at 39%, spends three times more. Even after correcting for purchasing-power disparities, it is clear that the Biden administration’s request for $886 billion in defense spending during the fiscal year commencing October 1 will dwarf Beijing’s level of effort.

The People’s Liberation Army has not seen significant combat since it fought Vietnam in 1979, and thus its performance in conflicts is uncertain. America’s joint force, in contrast, has been continuously engaged in overseas military action since 9/11. Although Beijing speaks occasionally of trying to seize Taiwan by force, it lacks the wherewithal to do so and fears the consequences of confrontation with America. Washington is aiding Taipei in its buildup of defensive forces, including most recently the sale of precision targeting devices for F-16 fighters.

Critics of China in Washington frequently express alarm at the pace of Beijing’s naval shipbuilding program, but a handful of US bombers equipped with stealthy antiship missiles would make quick work of the Chinese fleet in a war. Washington and its allies are steadily increasing their investment in technology needed to track and target shipping in the region.

Technology. China’s economic growth over the last four decades has been enabled more by cheap labor than advanced technology. Now that the availability of low-cost labor is waning, Beijing needs to grow its indigenous technology base. However, China tends to perform better in industrial activities than in leveraging the potential of the software-driven digital revolution.

The Biden administration intends to keep it that way by limiting the availability of chipmaking technology, blocking access to cloud computing services, and pressuring companies to limit their China tech investments. MicrosoftMSFT +1%, a big employer of software engineers in Beijing and Shanghai, has recently moved to shift its Chinese talent offshore.

I could go on to address the reserve-currency dominance of the dollar and other sources of US strength, but the bottom line is that China probably will never match America’s power, much less surpass it. A combination of smart policies in Washington and deep-seated defects in China precludes the Middle Kingdom from ever being a true superpower.

There are so many statements that are just wrong or just condescending. This is a low quality cheap article for people like this opening poster to feel "Good".
 
.
Another rubbish propaganda article

There are so many statements that are just wrong or just condescending. This is a low quality cheap article for people like this opening poster to feel "Good".
There is one thing in this article that Chinese government needs to pay attention to. US companies' branch companies or research centers in China are transferring Chinese talents to US. This is really hotile move made by US companies. Obviously US companies are playing spy role in China. It's a threat to China's national security. China should take counter measures.
 
Last edited:
.
China never said it wanted to become a super power, it’s America projecting what it wants, to lord over every nation on earth. What I learned from the Americans is when they accuse others of doing something it’s usually what the are thinking of doing or already have done. That is the proper way to view all media/propaganda from the US.
 
.
What China wants is an independent system, the problem is that the United States cannot accept a system that is not under their control to exist in the world.

India is more keen to become a superpower and let white people serve them as waiters.

I think China's wish is about to come true.
 
. .
Lol, in no way anytime China wants to be a superpower esp in the American sense, it's only the paranoid Americans are worried all the time that China is going to take US place in the world hegemony.
 
.
There are so many statements that are just wrong or just condescending. This is a low quality cheap article for people like this opening poster to feel "Good".
The article has the rigor and nuance of something written while sitting on a toilet.
 
.
China didn't claim they want to be superpower to rule the world. This is Anglo projection, the white man fears what will happen if a non white power dominates them. They fear retaliation for 100 years of humiliation from white man.
 
.
forbes is a chinese publication now i heard
Yes but probably Forbes’ non Chinese employees don’t have CCP social credit score system assigned to them; hence they keep on publishing lies and propaganda about China.

When all Forbes’ employees will be Chinese citizens, only then they will start publishing truth and nothing but the truth. Like Global Times does.
 
.
Contrary to popular perception, America’s two major political parties do not disagree about everything.

Unlike how it feels in the social media, politicians mostly work together.

A new analysis from nonpartisan legislative staff shows that 95.89 percent of bills that passed the legislature in 2023 did so with bipartisan support. The legislature passed 487 bills during the 2023 legislative session, 467 of which received the ‘yes’ vote of at least one Republican senator or representative.

“When I’m out in our community talking to people, I think the thing that surprises them most is how much we work together,” Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig said. “I’m so proud of the collaborative spirit of our legislative work, a great example of that was the bipartisan work done on the Blake bill.

“Of course there are still areas where we disagree with our Republican colleagues. Our Democratic majorities have had to go it alone on issues important to Washingtonians such as gun safety, reproductive freedom, tax reform and climate change. But our legislature has shown that we can disagree without being disagreeable, that we can find areas of agreement and government can work as intended.”

This work builds on bipartisan efforts from previous years:

  • In 2022, 291 of 308 bills passed with at least one Republican ‘yes’ vote. (94.48 percent)
  • In 2021, 310 of 334 bills passed with at least one Republican ‘yes’ vote (92.81 percent)
  • In the 2019-20 biennium, 812 of 854 bills passed with at least one Republican ‘yes’ vote (95.08 percent)


Although not eye-wateringly unanimous as in North Korea or China legislatures, this is still not an unfunctional legislative/Congress.

1693482633960.png
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom