What's new

Why can't India/Pakistan/China/Bangladesh be as clean as Australia?

not until south asia eliminates the destitute poverty and becomes advanced economies, and China is way ahead of ind/pak/bangla etc
 
.
But can you accomplish that? If I have the money I would like to travel to India, China etc.

Yes we can accomplish. Nobody believed that we will progress so rapidly in IT which we did in 1990s. DO you know when I was young, we used to praise an audio Tap of Japan too much as these sort of audio tape was not produced in India. We have progressed a lot. We are on Mars now. We design and build latest cars now. We reduced poverty so fast that there is no parallel example is there in world. As a civilization, we are the people who can rapidly change.So what you see and found almost impossible to be done in near future, we can change it rapidly. Our Middle class is getting more and more powerful. We in our middle class have 2 to 20 time higher income than our monthly expense. if Prima facie something looks very difficult to achieve, We can and have achieved it and achieved it too fast.

Come to India. you will amazed to see so many things. Be my guest.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes we can accomplish. Nobody believed that we will progress so rapidly in IT which we did in 1990s. DO you know when I was young, we used to praise an audio Tap of Japan too much as these sort of audio tape was not produced in India. We have progressed a lot. We are on Mars now. We design and build latest cars now. We reduced poverty so fast that there is no parallel example is there in world. As a civilization, we are the people who can rapidly change.So what you see and found almost impossible to be done in near future, we can change it rapidly. Our Middle class is getting more and more powerful. We in our middle class have 2 to 20 time higher income than our monthly expense. Prima facie something look very difficult to achieve, We have achieved it too fast.

Come to India. you will amazed to see so many things. Be my guest.

How long can I stay in India for $5000 AUD?
 
.
China is very clean among Asian countries I was in china and I strongly feel this thing ...

No.....China lags in cleanliness in comparison to Japan and Singapore..Japan beats most of the nations in the cleanliness and then may be Singapore or South Korea...I am not sure about Pakistan....But India is not even in the race too...
 
.
Australia is the most pristine, beautiful, gorgeous country on the planet, we are good at almost every sport, and we love the great outdoors. With a population of only 23.13 million, yet we are competitive in every field be it sports, technology, science, health, research we are up there with the best.

The question is why can't other nation in Asia use Australia as a example? Why is it so hard in these nation for people to not litter, or defecate in the streets?
Canada is similar to Australia except you guys have more bigots and we have more useless politicians.
 
. . . .
It is up to you. If you invite me to Australia, I will trust you.
If you come here, you will fill that if anybody can be trusted, it is Indians and me.

What about daily expenses, food, travel, you know just daily living? How much is a 4 star hotel?
 
.
Small population is not an excuse. The scientific advancement of a nation is measured by total output. Just like military spending is determined by total amount, not per capita. The problem of H-index is already clearly seen in its definition:

"A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Np − h) papers have no more than h citations each."

it is NOT an excuse, being small in population, that did limit many thing, and for one, the pool of talent.

Number of article does not reflect the true scientific output as you cannot assume each one of the article have the same value as other article, other writer and other discipline.

And No, scientific advancement cannot be quantified like military spending. If so, would you be saying small country with less article output are scientifically less advance?

So, since UK publish more article than Japan, can we say the UK are more scientifically advance than Japan?

By quoting the criticism section of H-index in the Wikipedia does not negate the argument that there are no basis on measuring a country scientific output in number than doubting the authority of H-index. the two are different things

This means a paper written in Chinese is heavily discriminated due to the simple fact it is written in a language other than English.

Not exactly know how you get from H-index to discriminate of Chinese Article because it was written in Chinese.

Bear in mind only 4 out of top 10 h indexed country have English as an official language, or you are saying japan, Germany, Switzerland, France, Italy and Netherland all wrote their paper in English??
 
.
What about daily expenses, food, travel, you know just daily living? How much is a 4 star hotel?

It will cost you 4000 to 5000 Rs every day. this means 100 AUD every day. You count 100 AUD for other expenses. Your daily expense should not exceed 200 to 250 AUD every day. If you travel to the places like haridwar or Rishikesh, expense shall be almost Zero as you will get free accommodation food etc. If you travel by train in A/C 2 tire, cost shall be nominal say 50 AUD for 1000 to 1500 KM Journey.
 
.
It will cost you 4000 to 5000 Rs every day. this means 100 AUD every day. You count 100 AUD for other expenses. Your daily expense should not exceed 200 to 250 AUD every day. If you travel to the places like haridwar or Rishikesh, expense shall be almost Zero as you will get free accommodation food etc. If you travel by train in A/C 2 tire, cost shall be nominal say 50 AUD for 1000 to 1500 KM Journey.

Is the AUD getting good rupees at the moment?
 
. .
it is NOT an excuse, being small in population, that did limit many thing, and for one, the pool of talent.

Number of article does not reflect the true scientific output as you cannot assume each one of the article have the same value as other article, other writer and other discipline.

And No, scientific advancement cannot be quantified like military spending. If so, would you be saying small country with less article output are scientifically less advance?

So, since UK publish more article than Japan, can we say the UK are more scientifically advance than Japan?

By quoting the criticism section of H-index in the Wikipedia does not negate the argument that there are no basis on measuring a country scientific output in number than doubting the authority of H-index. the two are different things



Not exactly know how you get from H-index to discriminate of Chinese Article because it was written in Chinese.

Bear in mind only 4 out of top 10 h indexed country have English as an official language, or you are saying japan, Germany, Switzerland, France, Italy and Netherland all wrote their paper in English??

Easy, because H-index works off number of citations and in research work, you don't necessarily cite things because it is key to your research development. You cite it because it is in your research circle. Hence why it is not an accurate measurement for quality of work.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom