The fundamentals of 2-nation theory is -
1. Muslims are a nation. They are united by the religion.
2. Muslims can not live with non-muslims hence they need a separate Islamic nation.
Muslims can live with Non-Muslims and they have for years given their integration in the Western world. But Muslims cannot live with Indians who are determined to elect Genocidal communal Modi.
Our doubt was based on -
1. There are over 50 muslim nations. If they were one and governed by same Islamic philosophy and governance then they should have been one nation.
Pakistan is different case. Pakistan was not motivated by the Islamic philosophy. Pakistan became independence nation to avoid being part of India that has historically maintained communal mindset towards Muslims.
2. Muslims have been living with non-muslims in many countries. They live in peace where they are in minority but where they are in majority or they are in sizeable numbers, the peace is gone.
Because their lands have been invaded and burnt to the ground by the foreign elements?
3. Pakistan, since its birth, has never been a peaceful country despite being an Islamic nation.
Pakistan has one of the best diplomatic relationship with China despite China's aggressive policy towards its Muslim citizens.
Pakistan has always been peaceful nation, even to the point that accommodated millions of Bengali from Bangladesh and millions from Afghanistan despite their hatred for Pakistan.
It is India that has been anti-peace nation given its sponsoring terrorism in Afghanistan/Pakistan, Sri Lanka/China, and even to the point, Nepal [suppressing] despite being Hindu dominated nation.
4. Pakistan disintegrated in 1971 proving that 2-nation theory was flawed.
2-nations theory would have been question mark the moment when Bangladesh agreed to be part of India. Why did Bangladesh claim independence - even from India despite Indian involvement to free Bangladesh from Pakistan? Because Bangladesh only supported India for their independence nation as
Muslim nation.
And 2-nations theory is based on
Muslim-Hindu. The fact that Bangladesh chose for independence as
Muslim nation instead of joining with India who got Bangladesh their independence nation does suggest Bangladesh had 2-nations theory in mind.
Never mind the fact that 2-nations theory has been kept alive over and over again due to Indian Occupied and revived by Genocidal communal Modi, but even Bangladesh sought for its own independence as
Muslim nation - the same that fought India for Pakistan as
Muslim nation before 1947. That is kind of embarrassing for so-called pro-claimed savior.
5. Bangladesh declared itself a secular nation despite being a muslim majority that means that as an independent nation they have no issues with non-muslims. Another reason to prove that 2-nation theory was flawed.
Bangladesh is
Muslim nation enjoined by majority of citizens that hate India to the core despite the friendly foreign policy towards India. Bangladesh hates India more than Pakistan despite 1971. Who are you fooling here?