Sashan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 1
The war in the Deccan isn't the cause of the severe downfall of the Mughal empire. The Mughal empire would most likely have recovered it was the attack by Nadir Shah which finished off the Mughal empire as an effective and cohesive empire. I don't deny the war in the Deccan was harmful to the Mughal empire but the invasion by Nadir Shah is what crippled the Empire. The Marathas would have eventually been dealt with and crushed and couldn't dare to attack the Mughal capital Delhi. That is what Nadir Shah did and set the Empire in permanent dismay.
Though I do agree Marathas should also be blamed, their treason and insurgent activities opened up south Asia to foreign invasion and susceptible to colonialism. As my original point stands why only blame the British? Blame Iran/Afsharid Dynasty as well you can add Marathas as well to the list.
What Nadir Shah did was a hard kick to the rotten pillar of a Mughal empire caused by the 27 years war with Marathas, the longest war in the Indian history.
Mughals under Aurangazeb did not represent South Asian people - Aurangazeb destroyed the religious status quo prevalent before him by destroying Hindu temples, killing of Sikh Guruji, destroying Christian settlements and established Islamic law(though not enforced). In a multireligious society like South Asia at that time, by these actions he was representing only people from one community. So there is no question of treason by the Marathas.