Nalwa
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 826
- Reaction score
- 0
1) No, they are not. I did not say anything like that. It wasn't a choice between one or the other, so I don't know why the question is being asked. Speaks more about you than me.
2) That kind of argument holds no water in a court of law. "Your honour, I killed 16 innocent people in the alrger interest, in the larger interest the lives of these 16 people were unimportant." It doesn't work that way. If you kill an innoncet person, you will be convicted of murder and given the appropriate sentence, whether there was a larger interest to it or not. Thats accepted legal practice in any country.
What court of law are you talking about? How many perpretators of the 1984 riots have been punished by the same court of law? How many police have been hanged for picking up 1000s of youth never to be seen? Let me see you have your brother picked up by the police and returned by ambulance and see how much your trust the judiciary. Rajoana saw something similar and knew he couldn't trust the courts and took things in his own hands.
Judicial and democratic means are first to be applied by the state. If the state fails to uphold these values, the common citizens like Rajoana are fully justified in doing what they did.