Well, it goes thus for me, jamahir brother :
I served and worked security so that I know too well about real life violence.
I will use force when necessary but it never made me happy to do so, it is
merely a tool that I wish humans could do without as far as I am concerned.
From this, I derive that virtual bad actions are less important. I understand and agree to both
you and Spring Onion that they are unwelcome and should be curbed but at the same time,
as in Hinduguy's answer above, they carry little weight IMHoO. And in the spirit of totally open
discussions cannot be fully expected not to happen. Many standpoints are aggressive by their
very nature to those who oppose them; I found you to express views I found harsh at times.
So, if things can be mean without intent, in reverse mean things without a chance of realization
carry less weight too?
What I'm attempting to convey is that one should differentiate between the helpless anger of poor
people with little control and little means that Spring Onion correctly described, the childish wanton
for pseudo-anger found in Hinduguy's reply ( likely with some humor to alleviate it ) and the real
threats as if someone says online that they will go to their school or work place and shoot people.
The latter is cause for worry whereas the former is Trolling of either the let's be nasty cuz it's "fun"
& possible or the I'm going to provoke for kicks type.
By comparison, IRL, I often calmed violent folks just by shoving myself in their face to force them to
react all the while blocking their options : they chose to stand down over 85% of the time when they
understand that activating the menace will see them losing the confrontation.
It comes from confidence on my part not having lost a fight yet but it also shows how overreacting
would have had me beating people up that were actually not ready to assume the consequences.
The same goes for arguments. Once I know that I won one, what does it matter to me if the crybaby
goes on spewing untruths. I guess it also comes from having a mind to balance my physical abilities.
Think of Galileo's purported "E si Muove!" He may have been condemned by the Church authorities of
the time but in history, he was vindicated twice as the Church of now let go of their intransigence on this
and acknowledged the truth and he is remembered forever as a genius whereas no one save specialized
historians knows the name of the clowns that convicted him anymore!
So that if he could stand on being right alone although having been forced into submission, why would I
fear those I have vanquished already on account of them trying to write their stupidity and shame in stone?
I find them irritating to be sure but they inspire more pity than anger once you discard them.
Tay.