Why are Kashmiris sticking to failed strategies (namely militancy and Indo-Pak war)?

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Why are Kashmiris sticking to failed strategies (namely militancy and Indo-Pak war)?

They should know that the strategies they have hitherto used have failed. Kashmiris have been trying these two options for 6 decades. It hasn't produced the result. Yet they are sticking to useless plans like hoping for a war and joining militancy in hordes. It doesn't work when Pakistan is so tiny and India is so big. Why then are Kashmiris sticking to failed strategies? Why aren't Kashmiris doing something that works?

Pakistanis may not agree with this angle but the answer may be that the Kashmiri leadership may be covertly on India's payroll. The likes of popular Kashmiri leaders like Geelani and Yasin Malik may all be India's agents. These Indian agents who are hawks in public might actually be intentionally serving India's interests by misleading the Kashmiri youth and masses into doing something that doesn't work. Just as Gandhi was British agent and was used by British to lead India's entire population astray, Hurriyat and other popular Kashmiri leaders may be Indian agents who might be successfully teaching Kashmiri youth to adopt bad ideas in their struggle.

How else would you explain that Kashmiris are still into stupid ideas like militancy against the giant country of India and hoping for India-Pakistan war?

@naveedullahkhankhattak

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

@naveedullahkhankhattak

do you have any better option or them to get independence.
Every kashmiri who die increase hate and results in more violence and this goes on.

 

[django]

They will go down thirsty.

Time will tell young fellow, if the mighty USSR can breakup so can the British created nation sorry ABOMI-nation known as India!

 

[Jacob Martin]

The Kashmiri freedom movement doesn't have a salafi flavour to it, you won't see the likes of Al Queda and ISIS attracted towards it,

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=k...biw=412&bih=604&dpr=2.63#imgrc=sYI0UOdF3Yq-HM:

You forget that in this age it's all out there. The days when one could simply lie about everything and hope not to get caught are gone forever.

 

[khanmubashir]

why every time you guys live in Hindu/muslim dilemma. actually reality is that religious mind set is destroying yourself , it is not harming india.

for every single issue, you look from religious angle. then you also know what is happening with you guys from so called muslim brotherhood.

and lets come on kashmir issue: yes he has very legitimate question from 70 years they are doing again n again same tactics. there is nothing change? so if you have answer then go ahead , if not then ignore. simple is that. it is sad to bring everytime hindu/muslim etc etc.

so gandhi indias bapu is british agent ????????????? lol then who brought indians there freedom jinah ??? wont that make jinah father of india

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Time will tell young fellow, if the mighty USSR can breakup so can the British created nation sorry ABOMI-nation known as India!

Dude,

Compare the ratio of populations of Soviet Union and Afghanistan in 1980s and the corresponding ratio of populations of India and Kashmir in 2020s before you bluff.

 

[django]

Dude,

Compare the ratio of populations of Soviet Union and Afghanistan in 1980s and the corresponding ratio of populations of India and Kashmir in 2020s before you bluff.

It collapsed internally, I never even mentioned the Afghan conflict! if that mighty behemoth can collapse so can British created India, lol at least in the case of USSR it was white Russian Slavs who conquered adjacent territories in the case of India it was white British men who came from continents afar and conquered the damn thing and eventually handed it on a plate to their one time slaves, the Delhi and Mumbia elite!Enough said, now do not waste my time with your gibberish.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

It collapsed internally, I never even mentioned the Afghan conflict! if that mighty behemoth can collapse so can British created India, lol at least in the case of USSR it was white Russian Slavs who conquered adjacent territories in the case of India it was white British men who came from continents afar and conquered the damn thing and eventually handed it on a plate to their one time slaves, the Delhi and Mumbia elite!Enough said, now do not waste my time with your gibberish.

Jatey jatey apna umar tou bata do (before you quit the argument let us know your age).

I want to know whether you will live long enough to see India's victory.

 

[django]

Jatey jatey apna umar tou bata do (before you quit the argument let us know your age).

I want to know whether you will live long enough to see India's victory.

Those 60 plus insurgencies are not going away in fact they are only going from strength to strength.
Gangadesh mata ki jai heheheheeeeeee

 

[Chhatrapati]

It collapsed internally, I never even mentioned the Afghan conflict! if that mighty behemoth can collapse so can British created India, lol at least in the case of USSR it was white Russian Slavs who conquered adjacent territories in the case of India it was white British men who came from continents afar and conquered the damn thing and eventually handed it on a plate to their one time slaves, the Delhi and Mumbia elite!Enough said, now do not waste my time with your gibberish.

The never ending pipe dreams and conspiracy theories.
Name a failed democracy? Soviets failed because of their protectionism and over concentration of power in Moscow and Communist party.
Lastly they had a Gorbachev.

 

[Spring Onion]

Kashmiris should join indian army and learn few tricks from Afghan Taliban

 

[Bharat Muslim]

Time will tell young fellow, if the mighty USSR can breakup so can the British created nation sorry ABOMI-nation known as India!

If nuclear weapons (or other such game-changing technology) aren't used, there is no chance of that (India's breakup) happening.

 

[Tiger Genie]

The entire Pakistani mindset about Kashmir is based on the invalid assumption that the religion has anything to do with it. The idea of Kashmir being 'muslim' is simply a mirage created by Pak military establishment to sustain the boogieman, which is necessary to hide their failures and corruption. The two words 'Kashmiri Pundit' simply vaporize all Pakistani and separatist arguments.

And on top of that, people have a lot of rights in a democracy but secession is not one of them. Even if 100% of people living a street, town, district, state or region vote to secede, there is no legal or constitutional basis for it.

An invasion is out of question because not a single country exists that can actually invade India and not be destroyed in backlash.

The ONLY way therefore for any separation is violent revolution. The separatist thugs in Kashmir simply do not have anywhere near the public support to call their mission a movement or revolution - they simply create nuisance to eke out a living because they cannot make it anyother way. Occasionally they are helped by Pakistan with funds and jihadis.

Given this state of affairs, this idiocy would have stopped 10+ years ago but for the disinterested congress government. Now that actual Indians interested in India have taken over, you see thugs on either side of the border whine scream kick and bawl.

One Mr.Major.Gogoi fixed all this nonsense with a rope.

 

[Hiptullha]

The entire Pakistani mindset about Kashmir is based on the invalid assumption that the religion has anything to do with it.

Except it does. Notice how PDF Indians will spends hours standing up for the Kashmiri Pandits and the "genocide" they suffered, but carelessly brush away the massacres Kashmiri Muslims faced in 1946 and pretend there is no legitimacy to the freedom movement. You people have already taken the side of a religious group over another but expect us to believe that religion has nothing to do with the conflict.

 

[Tiger Genie]

Except it does. Notice how PDF Indians will spends hours standing up for the Kashmiri Pandits and the "genocide" they suffered, but carelessly brush away the massacres Kashmiri Muslims faced in 1946 and pretend there is no legitimacy to the freedom movement. You people have already taken the side of a religious group over another but except us to believe that religion has nothing to do with the conflict.

This kind of pointless argument is no more than childish 'did...did too'....not too different from some of you that spend time to find the 'right emoticon' to strategically place in your smart posts on internet. You will get much better results if only you'd just go practice rotfl instead ...