What's new

Who’s scuttling Pak-Iran ties?

http://nation.com.pk/columns/02-Jun-2016/who-s-scuttling-pak-iran-ties
Our screaming shouting media found another reason to scream and shout about last week. The agreement between Iran and India to develop the Chabahar port and a trilateral transit accord that included Afghanistan as well, were projected as a conspiracy against Pakistan and clear proof that Iran had teamed up with our hostile neighbors to complete our isolation in the neighborhood. Was this uproar justified? Or did it serve to obfuscate the actual hurdles that stand in the way of deepening a win-win Pak-Iran relationship?

The Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan has since set the record straight on Chabahar and the $500 million deal with India to develop the port but our media prophets of doom don’t seem interested in paying attention to anything that upsets the scheme of their gloomy scenarios. Speaking at a seminar on Pak-Iran relations in Islamabad, the ambassador pointed out that Iran had offered the port development deal to Pakistan and China before signing it with India. Obviously, the media hype missed the point.

Besides, according to the ambassador, “The Chabahar agreement is not limited to three countries and doors are always open for Pakistan and other regional nations to join the deal”. He also said that there was no rivalry between the ports of Chahbahar and Gwadar and “In fact, both these ports complement each other”. Was the ambassador just being diplomatic and saying all these nice things to allay Pakistan’s apprehensions? I don’t think so.

It has been reported that Pakistan and Iran are working on plans to link Chabahar and Gawadar with Chinese cooperation. This fits in with the vision of regional integration being spearheaded by China. The CPEC and Gwadar are perhaps the most important elements of that vision in our part of the world, but surely they are not all there is to it. Iran and Central Asian states are integral parts of the envisioned network of roads, rail links, pipelines and other infrastructure projects. The first train from China has already arrived in Tehran.

A bit of perspective is surely in place. The key word in the emerging ethos of regional integration is win-win cooperation and not zero-sum competition with neighbors. To view the Iran-India deal on Chabahar as a threat to Gwadar and a conspiracy against the CPEC and Pakistan is, therefore, more than a bit misplaced. Granted that India is making moves that signal a clear drift on part of the country towards the US and its motives to sign the Chabahar deal might not be constructive, it would be really far-fetched to view Iran as a country that would join hands with India to subvert the vision of regional integration.

One must also consider the fact that until its recent betrayal, India had positioned itself as a key partner in BRICS that subscribed to the values of a multipolar world. Add to this the history of good relations between Iran and India, and the Chabahar deal hardly comes across as the evil plot that it is being painted as by some. In any case, in a world fluid with possibilities, right moves on our part could offset any danger that it might entail.

When it comes to forging a strong relationship with Iran, Pakistan has a natural advantage over India. But we need to do our bit to actualise that potential. Since the lifting of sanctions, Iran is talking to everyone and new avenues of trade and cooperation are being sought by it. Before we start getting all antsy about the Chabahar deal, perhaps we should take a look at how our government has responded to Iran’s efforts at deepening cooperation with Pakistan.

The foot-dragging on Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline is the most glaring example of our government’s attitude towards Iran. Despite the lifting of UN sanctions, our Petroleum Minister keeps repeating the mantra of sanctions as the reason for not completing our part of the pipeline. Is he talking about the executive formalities that we need to undertake or the pressure from the US that has opposed the project from day one? Iran’s offer to supply us electricity has similarly been spurned.

On his recent visit to Islamabad, President Rouhani offered to ensure Pakistan’s energy security and proposed measures to expand trade. Beyond the hypocritical slogans of brotherhood and hollow display of bonhomie, our government has done precious little to take concrete measures in order to translate these lucrative possibilities into reality. I guess it is waiting for a nod from the US to do that.

A section of our national media is similarly serving the purpose of driving a wedge between the two countries. It created and played up a controversy during President Rouhani’s visit regarding the discussion between the army chief and the visiting president.

An ISPR press release had stated that the army chief expressed his concern that RAW is involved in Pakistan, especially Balochistan, and sometimes it also uses the soil of our brother country, Iran. In his press conference, President Rouhani was asked whether the army chief brought up Kulbushan Yadav, the RAW agent apprehended from Balochistan, and he said this wasn’t discussed. Obviously, these are two different things and the two statements did not contradict each other. But the media made it come across as if one of them was lying.

Isn’t it odd that our media pundits took it in their stride when India signed agreements with Saudi Arabia that included cooperation in counter-terrorism and defence, but alarm bells started ringing when it came to the Iran-India deal on developing the Chabahar port for trade?

Strengthening of ties between Pakistan and Iran would be a big boost not only for the two countries but also for the prospects of regional peace and integration. We need to cooperate on Afghanistan and for countering militancy and separatism that is being fuelled in Balochistan on our side and theirs. Ground realities and the dynamics of geopolitics are pushing us in each other’s arms.

But clearly, our government and media prophets of doom and gloom are doing all they can to drive us apart

.


It would be nice if once in a while, even a supposedly balanced and non-obsessive piece on foreign relations and on Pakistan's neighbourhood managed to avoid dragging India into the analysis. This note started well, but all of a sudden, there seems to have been a rush of blood to the author's brain (umm, yes, it does beg the question, but let us stick to the point for now), and he makes a totally unexpected back-flip into the BRICs equation and 'India's betrayal'.

What is it about India that turns even intelligent Pakistanis into the other kind of Pakistanis? Does it need to be spelt out with big block letters and a free application of canes to recalcitrant posteriors that the vast majority of the poison pen fraternity backing the Sangh Parivar comes from either the under-educated, over-trained crowd sitting in ghettos all over the US, or from their less fortunate counterparts (their assessment, not mine) left in the mire back in India, practically drowning in a sea of beef-eating Muslims?

This present government had no choice but to brown-nose the US, and it also appealed to those of its constituency which is of feeble intellect (thus achieving almost universal coverage of this bloc) that defence expenditure, spear-headed by his capitalist cronies, is the magic wand that will create jobs.

Now, with that perspective, look at his actions. Add to other professional and political reasons his personal glee at going right into the administrative heart-land of the country that had earlier blocked his visa. What do you do with this volatile mixture other than shrug helplessly and drop a match into it?

BRICs my left foot. India's betrayal, my right foot. The sooner journalists of this type get shot summarily, the sooner we will substantially improve the quality of the human gene pool.


Iran has!

We have no issue with iran trying to improve or grow

We will counter and disrupt indias actions regardless but allowing india access behind us is a betrayal

I read your post and was deeply worried. Is genetic engineering a reality, secretly, behind our backs?

yeah.. that's y Iran kept its word and built its end of IP pipeline and pakistan has dropped the deal dead in the middle causing Iran financial loss... live in delusions... you will be woken up rudely soon.

These are deeper delusions than you suspect. This stems from the mother-delusion, that the whole world rotates around them. That nobody does anything without considering them and their role and the impact on them and the consequences of suffering their displeasure.......amazing phenomenon.

Don't call it Islamic iran its actually shia iran. Mr mullah bluffed the sunni citizens of iran during the "revolution" there is one slogan " la sunniya la shia , islamia islamia" since after the revolution they start exporting their sect and use it for their own objectives. just take the example of pakistani shias fighting in syria. Iranians launch a campaign with the name the of "labbaik ya hussain" to emotionally black mail the shias and then send them for war. They held a training camp in charsadda under the supervision of mr ameen shahidi, by this someone can understand the reason of bomb blast in charsadda.

And the signature says it all.

@WAJsal @HRK Either you discipline this user for using wahhabi slur liberally in every post or I'm going to start negative rating every post of his.



Care to elaborate which Anti Irani or every action Pakistan took haram Irani interests ? Do you forgot who voted against Iran in United Nations in recent past ?



Every logical and sane person know why Pakistan stop its end of construction. For the very same reasons India voted againt Iran in UNO and downgraded its trade ties severly with Iran until Murica lifted its sanctions

@Bratva

You do know that the man is as Hindu as they come, and wouldn't be able to tell you the difference between a Wahhabi and a walrus? Not to question you - far from it - but I think you've got him wrong.

12973446_745603368915519_7727822740307015742_o.jpg

Why is the Indian guy so ugly, dressed in some weird mini-dress and missing most of his teeth?
 
.
There is only one Islamic Revolution that is Islamic IRAN and after which all capitalists and monarchs started hiding behind religion and started calling themselves as khadim harman sharifain. capitalists and monarchists cannot own Islam. so you are wrong. you think shias are fool like you, they cannot become pussy taliban and do terrorism. Shias do big things. So your claim of terror against shias is a mere lie and distraction.



China is investor in both countries Pakistan and Iran and a Key player.

Regarding Gwadar and chahbahar, experts including chinese confirm that these two ports are not rivals and instead can compliment each other. But there is a saudi wahabi lobby doing bellhoo and propaganda against Islamic IRAN.

If it is not in pak interest to connect chahbahar to Gwadar then there is no need to connect. it is simple but doing bellhoo and propaganda against Islamic IRAN is not right. this saudi wahabi lobby is using it as a card against Islamic IRAN which is infact nullified but the media campaign continue against Islamic IRAN.

Iran has always been friendly to Pakistan but it is the It is the saudi wahabi lobby in Pakistan that always create bellhoo against Islamic IRAN. just like jewish lobby in usa that is against Iran and not allowing to remove sanctions despite the agreement. the only diff. here is that the saudi wahabi lobby is not open.

Iran has given many friendly offers to Pakistan in the past which were in our National interest and our Nation would have benefitted but again the Saudi Wahabi Lobby blocked all deals beneficial to our nation.

These deals include Gas pipeline, electricity supply to all border regions, refinery, trade.

There are hundreds of agreements during the past 3 decades between Iran and Pakistan but all have been blocked due to the same saudi wahabi lobby.

Chabahar may not be a rival but allowing indians the room to commit anti pakistan acts is a act of hostility on irans part don't you think
 
.
And the signature says it all.
I just defend the word Islamic. I m not a sunni nor shia just a simple Muslim. And never allow anyone to mingle sectarianism with Islam.

Why is the Indian guy so ugly, dressed in some weird mini-dress and missing most of his teeth
My mistake, rather this face should be replace by kulbhushan yadav.
 
.
I just defend the word Islamic. I m not a sunni nor shia just a simple Muslim. Nut never allow anyone to mingle sectarianism with Islam.

Hmm.

That sounds reasonable enough.


I just defend the word Islamic. I m not a sunni nor shia just a simple Muslim. Nut never allow anyone to mingle sectarianism with Islam.


My mistake, rather this face should be replace by kulbhushan yadav.

He's quite OK looking.

All right, permission granted. Snap to it, and don't take the whole day now.
 
.
The article makes sense only in case where Pakistani government is not making sufficient efforts in boosting business ties with Iran. I hope this is somewhere China will compel Pakistan, as i am certain that the Pakistani leadership is spineless enough to not go after national objectives and cares too much about disappointing the KSA +USA.
 
.
Pakistan and China don't want Indian vessel come close to Pakistani port. Its only 70 missiles and its strategic port of Pakistan. And Iran knows India is arch rival of Pakistan. Plus, Pakistan already caught a high level monkey on Baluchistan trees.
 
. .
It is in interests of Iran to scuttle ties with Pakistan for greater gains. Blaming Pakistani media just because certain sect in Pakistan feels more loyal towards Iran and thus is unhappy over facts presented by Media, is altogether a silly attitude.
 
. .
There is only one Islamic Revolution that is Islamic IRAN and after which all capitalists and monarchs started hiding behind religion and started calling themselves as khadim harman sharifain. capitalists and monarchists cannot own Islam. so you are wrong. you think shias are fool like you, they cannot become pussy taliban and do terrorism. Shias do big things. So your claim of terror against shias is a mere lie and distraction.
Lol, what was mullah akhter mansoor doing in iran before he moved to Pakistani side of the border? care to elaborate? and training Pakistani and Afghani shias to die and do the dirty work for ayatullah putin in syria and iraq, what do you say about that? sipah e muhammad is a shia terrorist organisation, so is tehreek e niffaz e fiqah jaafria. even kulbhosan yadev came through iran to Pakistan.
 
.
China is investor in both countries Pakistan and Iran and a Key player.

Regarding Gwadar and chahbahar, experts including chinese confirm that these two ports are not rivals and instead can compliment each other. But there is a saudi wahabi lobby doing bellhoo and propaganda against Islamic IRAN.

If it is not in pak interest to connect chahbahar to Gwadar then there is no need to connect. it is simple but doing bellhoo and propaganda against Islamic IRAN is not right. this saudi wahabi lobby is using it as a card against Islamic IRAN which is infact nullified but the media campaign continue against Islamic IRAN.

Iran has always been friendly to Pakistan but it is the It is the saudi wahabi lobby in Pakistan that always create bellhoo against Islamic IRAN. just like jewish lobby in usa that is against Iran and not allowing to remove sanctions despite the agreement. the only diff. here is that the saudi wahabi lobby is not open.

Iran has given many friendly offers to Pakistan in the past which were in our National interest and our Nation would have benefitted but again the Saudi Wahabi Lobby blocked all deals beneficial to our nation.

These deals include Gas pipeline, electricity supply to all border regions, refinery, trade.

There are hundreds of agreements during the past 3 decades between Iran and Pakistan but all have been blocked due to the same saudi wahabi lobby.
"B@KH : Thank you for the detailed reply
 
.
That was the base, and today Iran is no good to any of her neighbor.

Excellent (political or economical) relations with:
Iraq---check
Turkey---check
Armenia---check
Azerbaijan---check
Turkmenistan---check
Afghanistan---check
Oman---check
Pakistan---That depends on what you think but I say check.

Meanwhile Pakistan:
Excellent relations with China---check
Relations with India---you know better
Relations with Afghanistan--- you know better
Relation with Iran: That depends on what you think but I say good.

Double check your facts before saying something you have no idea about.

Why is the Indian guy so ugly, dressed in some weird mini-dress and missing most of his teeth?

Because the desperate racist creator tried to show his nature by drawing the Indian side with a monster face, that's the most he could do obviously.
 
Last edited:
.
Excellent (political or economical) relations with:
Iraq---check
Turkey---check
Armenia---check
Azerbaijan---check
Turkmenistan---check
Afghanistan---check
Oman---check
Pakistan---That depends on what you think but I say check.

Meanwhile Pakistan:
Excellent relations with China---check
Relations with India---you know better
Relations with Afghanistan--- you know better
Relation with Iran: That depends on what you think but I say good.

Double check your facts before saying something you have no idea about.



Because the desperate racist creator tried to show his nature by drawing the Indian side with a monster face, that's the most he could do obviously.
Iraq . Good only after when mulla transferred his revolution through USA, Mulla still interfering too much..
Turkey ... not good at all,
Azers ... always complaining
Afghanistan ... after mulla got good with help of USA
Gulf Arabs... no thing to say every body knows ,, though you can say whatever you want
Pakistan.... mulla trying to export his revolution trough shia organisations... Pak will be very good when mulla's organisations got govt. ... hopefully never.
 
.
Not only to Pakistan but to all the neighbors, just after his arrival, Mr Mulla started exporting his so called revolution.
That was the base, and today Iran is no good to any of her neighbor.
It's not just only Pakistan that's suffering from the mulla's revolution.

Iran has!

We have no issue with iran trying to improve or grow

We will counter and disrupt indias actions regardless but allowing india access behind us is a betrayal

Don't call it Islamic iran its actually shia iran. Mr mullah bluffed the sunni citizens of iran during the "revolution" there is one slogan " la sunniya la shia , islamia islamia" since after the revolution they start exporting their sect and use it for their own objectives. just take the example of pakistani shias fighting in syria. Iranians launch a campaign with the name the of "labbaik ya hussain" to emotionally black mail the shias and then send them for war. They held a training camp in charsadda under the supervision of mr ameen shahidi, by this someone can understand the reason of bomb blast in charsadda.



Playing into the hands of Indians.

Your unrestrained, dumb emotions is your biggest enemy - followed by radical Islamism and India (in order).
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom