Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
well we took 300k refuges and we have 2000 acre of land for refuges
and the number of refuges will go upto 560k to 600k
while india is deporting them
we are all bengali speaking people in india bangladesh rohingyas
but we are all in different countries
SHW is not our slave she is India slave its was the BDR who let the refugges
We will deport these illegal rohingya and our slave SHW can shed a few tears for optics if she wants....and then go back to business of accommodating our "political" girth as usual.
You on other hand can welcome as many rohingya as you want and have Bengali kumbaya with them all you want. That's your decision. You need not agree with ours, but in the end you respect and accept its our decision to make.
Now go run to your buddy China and get them to vote pro-BD or even "neutral" (say abstain) as @Doyalbaba hollers for.... for the statement condemning MM in UNSC. You have one day left to change their mind.
a decade ago there was a DOCUMENTRY on British television, Channel 4 of how Bangladeshi farmers have been shot dead by Indian BSF for crossing the fields whilst farming. Number of victims run into the hundreds. Also if Bangladesh is not a hostile nation to India why does india feel compelled to fence the entire border with BD with a shoot to kill policy in place?
BD govt (who we influence/control) only exercises limited security control on its riff raff people esp w.r.t migration/smuggling/illegal activity. Hence fence is on only one side and UN recognises only one country as having to host millions of illegals from the other currently (thus the 1st step is always to choke and stop the flow before we deal more effectively with long term solution of those already infiltrated inside). Hence we need border to be secured with as much violent means as required.....because the people transiting only understand that language given they are not educated or civilised. These are the same people that blindly believe (and support because it gives them an easy bogeyman) their govt claims of 3 million killed by Pakistan in 1971, just remember that.
There is no genetic difference between W Bengalis and BD'shis. There was also massive cross-border migration during 1947 where Muslims mgrated from West Bengal to BD and Hindus from BD to West Bengal.
Where did I say purely genetic? There may be a cpl genetic differences overall, nothing major....but the main differences lie elsewhere (aforementioned culture, development, language variant). Its plain as day to see intelligence and cultural inertia of West Bengalis compared to Bangladeshis (you can compare even just their elites). That's not saying its impossible with the correct investment and time and priority given in BD to pursuing higher and better education access etc to meet the Bengali potential illustrated by West Bengalis. It's just not in evidence right now....and it is why the recent (post 1971) influx of BD illegals (mostly happened in the 80s and 90s but also more recent than that) stand out all the more to West Bengalis and North Easterners.
With BD's much stronger economy, any migration is more likely to be from West bengal to BD, rather than the other way round!
BD economy = joke. You have half the realised consumption and half the worker productivity of Indian average. You are just coming from a way worse situation from before, so you don't realise how bad you still are compared to Indian average (which is where West Bengal more or less is at economically).
As for the "migration" likely to be reversed, it simply doesn't show in the UN published numbers. Hence why you dodge me asking you to show where even BD govt officially claims it....because BD govt knows better....whatever some of their low end bureaucrats and ministers may spout from time to time for domestic optics and consumption.
Whereas India in comparison has brought up BD illegal numbers in parliament when questions raised and they are thus on official statements.
United Nations may differ on the scale (India says 20 million figure more or less, UN normally puts at anywhere between 3 - 10 million depending on generation and recency of what constitutes an "illegal")....but they definitely agree its an established and immensely skewed uni-directional phenomenon.