Who was the Greatest Emperor in South Asian History?

[ShahidT]

DO YOU KNOW WHO IS THE GREATEST EMPEROR OF ALL TIME ?

ITS HIM ! !

OVER THOUSAND OF YEARS ALL OVER THE WORLD ! !

no, aurangzeb neither lived nor ruled for thousands of years. by the way how did you find such an accurate portrait of him?

 

[BDforever]

no, aurangzeb neither lived nor ruled for thousands of years. by the way how did you find such an accurate portrait of him?

google barah cheese hay

 

[INDIC]

1. The Afghan, Sher Shah Suri was our hero and emperor. The administrative system, land reforms, military set up and state infrastructure built by him were followed by the Mughuls. The British also adopted the same with changes required for colonial / commercial exploitation.

2. Aurangzeb had begun cleansing the administration and the ruling family of the degeneration and lethargy that had set in. The Army had become rusty and the Emperor had made it ship shape. The later Mughals brought down the empire because they had diverted from the course Aurangzeb had set.

Aurangzeb was the destroyer of Mughal dynasty.

 

[Axa-]

Timur Lenk.

 

[Matrixx]

Zardari

 

[Hellraiser007]

Timur Lenk.

He is a looter not an Emperor. He came to Delhi burned it, looted it and went away.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

Timur Lenk.

Timur hardly ruled any part of India. He just massacred, looted , plundered and ran back.

 

[Hermione G]

Me... End of the story... On the serious note i think Babar was good...

Zardari

well he z THE best... no match....

 

[khanboy007]

what about sher shah suri !!!! i dont see his name

Sher Shah Suri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

During his five year rule from 1540 to 1545, he set up a new civic and military administration, issued the first Rupee and re-organised the postal system of India. He further developed Humayun's Dina-panah city and named it Shergarh and revived the historical city of Pataliputra as Patna which had been in decline since the 7th century CE.[11] He is also famously remembered for killing a fully grown tiger with his bare hands in a jungle of Bihar.[4][9] He extended the Grand Trunk Road from Chittagong in Bangladesh to Kabul in Afghanistan.

the rupee

 

[Axa-]

He is a looter not an Emperor. He came to Delhi burned it, looted it and went away.

That's what they teach you at Indian schools?

He is not that kind of person it is all propaganda.. anti-Turkic propaganda.

 

[Hellraiser007]

That's what they teach you at Indian schools?

He is not that kind of person it is all propaganda.. anti-Turkic propaganda.

We read correct history, But only time he came to India is for looting, then he left so he cannot be considered a South Asian emperor may be for Central Asia.

 

[Axa-]

We read correct history, But only time he came to India is for looting, then he left so he cannot be considered a South Asian emperor may be for Central Asia.

I dont want to derail this wonderful thread or sound as a troll but when Timur came down to South Asia there was no power who can stand against him, same in Central Asia same other areas, where were these 'Emperors' when Timur was around the ones that dared to test his power got beaten one by one, Timur Conguerors/gets anything he wishes and there is no 'Emperor' who could stop it.

 

[Hellraiser007]

I dont want to derail this wonderful thread or sound as a troll but when Timur came down to South Asia there was no power who can stand against him, same in Central Asia same other areas, where were these 'Emperors' when Timur was around the ones that dared to test his power got beaten one by one, Timur Conguerors/gets anything he wishes and there is no 'Emperor' who could stop it.

But he never ruled S.Asia so he is not in the list, got it??

 

[Joe Shearer]

1. The Afghan, Sher Shah Suri was our hero and emperor. The administrative system, land reforms, military set up and state infrastructure built by him were followed by the Mughuls. The British also adopted the same with changes required for colonial / commercial exploitation.

2. Aurangzeb had begun cleansing the administration and the ruling family of the degeneration and lethargy that had set in. The Army had become rusty and the Emperor had made it ship shape. The later Mughals brought down the empire because they had diverted from the course Aurangzeb had set.

Typical.

A hero and an emperor whom the people of Bengal never saw. Wonderful and illustrative.

Like the Sylheti peasant asked to name his favourite fruit, who replies without a blink, "The dates of Baghdad".

I dont want to derail this wonderful thread or sound as a troll but when Timur came down to South Asia there was no power who can stand against him, same in Central Asia same other areas, where were these 'Emperors' when Timur was around the ones that dared to test his power got beaten one by one, Timur Conguerors/gets anything he wishes and there is no 'Emperor' who could stop it.

Sadly, you managed to sound like a troll. This thread was not about who was the greatest military leader of south Asia, but who was the greatest emperor. Would you, by the same token, agree that Alexander III the Great was the greatest emperor of Anatolia?

 

[Hellraiser007]

Typical.

A hero and an emperor whom the people of Bengal never saw. Wonderful and illustrative.

Like the Sylheti peasant asked to name his favourite fruit, who replies without a blink, "The dates of Baghdad".