Who supports the TTP act(s)?

[jbond197]

I am Indian. My government allegedly funds and supports the TTP. I am accordingly constrained to tacitly support the TTP

What did you just do? You just handed the proof of India's involvement as gift to Pakistanis.. How irresponsible of you? Did you forget all the lessons from the RAW training before you were made a RAW agent and stationed in South Africa!!

 

[Irfan Baloch]

I wish @US_statedept_retired is Indian. He alone is many times better articulated and smarter than all these garden variety terrorism and bigotry apologists put together.

your wish has come true

look at the typical phrase below, reminds me of someone

Please learn to read and then comprehend the links you have provided- from the credible news organizations.

 

[Winchester]

"Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

18 U.S. Code § 912 - Officer or employee of the United States | LII / Legal Information Institute

 

[jbond197]

^^^
Oh no another RAW agent is exposed in this thread.. What's wrong with you folks?? With RAW agents like you I am sure India is doomed.

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

your wish has come true

look at the typical phrase below, reminds me of someone

And here I thought you were quoting me to interact positively. I see you choose to go another way. I would have typically written as having poor reading comprehension. but felt in his case he needed a pause in between.

You got me.

"Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

18 U.S. Code § 912 - Officer or employee of the United States | LII / Legal Information Institute

Let me help you. All you have to do now is pay me or give me something of value as per clause " obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both"

 

[notsuperstitious]

your wish has come true

look at the typical phrase below, reminds me of someone

I don't know Sir. But he's single handedly got people gnashing their teeth! Lets give credit where due.

 

[Thəorətic Muslim]

You're stating two different points.

1. Freedom of Speech is for everyone.
2. Why it isn't extended to terrorist who have don't differentiate from civilian and military targets.

And after I read Horus stating the reason the site allows those who support the French terrorists (soft or full on support) from being disqualified from this site here, is because of Freedom of Speech. SORRY Horus for using you as the example, but you did make an important point or distinction which allowed me the confidence to start this thread.

Freedom of Speech doesn't extend to "Yelling fire in a crowded movie theater."

There's freedom of speech, speaking your mind, ie verbal. Then there's freedom of expression, speaking your mind through other forms of medium, ie cartoon, tv show etc.

Freedom of Speech or Expression, doesn't allow you to draw appalling cartoons of a Prophet regardless of the Religion of his modern followers. Regardless of a rebuttal that all religious figures are "fair game". There's a difference between a Prophet, a Rabbi, and the Pope.

SO- my question is-

1. Would similar soft or full on support of TTP be okay with those who have similar thoughts of support w/ the French terrorists?
2. And what is difference between the ideologies of those of the French terrorists vs. TTP?

1. Are you asking if people who support the TTP would support the terrorism in France? Answer is simple, yes. Those people are so far uneducated that even their off-spring are a lost cause for education.

2. The french terrorist wanted "justice" for the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The TTP wants a Sharia State, where the "educated" religious figures can do whatever they want, but the people are bound by a strict "Sharia Code" only they are bound too.

 

[Winchester]

Let me help you. All you have to do now is pay me or give me something of value as per clause

I don't recall quoting you or pointing towards you

Here we have a saying in Urdu and i am sure you do understand it
"chor ke daari me tinka"

anyways as per your logic you are safe for now

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

You're stating two different points.

1. Freedom of Speech is for everyone.
2. Why it isn't extended to terrorist who have don't differentiate from civilian and military targets.



Freedom of Speech doesn't extend to "Yelling fire in a crowded movie theater."

There's freedom of speech, speaking your mind, ie verbal. Then there's freedom of expression, speaking your mind through other forms of medium, ie cartoon, tv show etc.

Freedom of Speech or Expression, doesn't allow you to draw appalling cartoons of a Prophet regardless of the Religion of his modern followers. Regardless of a rebuttal that all religious figures are "fair game". There's a difference between a Prophet, a Rabbi, and the Pope.



1. Are you asking if people who support the TTP would support the terrorism in France? Answer is simple, yes. Those people are so far uneducated that even their off-spring are a lost cause for education.

2. The french terrorist wanted "justice" for the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The TTP wants a Sharia State, where the "educated" religious figures can do whatever they want, but the people are bound by a strict "Sharia Code" only they are bound too.

1. I'm asking the reverse. Since they share the same ideology
2. French Terrorists were two parts. Part 1 (brothers) pledged to AQ in Yemen and Part 2 ( lone gunmen) pledged to ISIS. They were more than just justice for the prophet, as ISIS and AQ ideologies remind us.

Both have same goals as the TTP. One of the issues with both is what they perceive as disrespect of the Mohammed and justifying violence as a means to avenge it.

I don't recall quoting you or pointing towards you

Here we have a saying in Urdu and i am sure you do understand it
"chor ke daari me tinka"

anyways as per your logic you are safe for now

Well you kind of made it obvious who you were directing it at. I'm sorry if you were offended.

I understand spoken Urdu a fair bit and Hindi. Something I had stated upfront when I 1st joined here. Kinda requirement in my ex- line of work when they assign you to a region/ theater. But I don't understand all within the statement you made. I hope it was indeed as funny as you claimed

 

[Solomon2]

I understand spoken Urdu a fair bit and Hindi. Something I had stated upfront when I 1st joined here. Kinda requirement in my ex- line of work when they assign you to a region/ theater.

How do the Urdu-language forums compare to PDF? Better? Worse? About the same?

 

[I.R.A]

Whatever made you think I am scoring points against muslims. If there is anything I am trying to do- that would be to separate the islamist supporters from the good folks who follow Islam . I think you are too fixated on being attacked.

I said I have read up on sharia and simply stated " not in our houses ( west) but please feel welcome to have it in yours". Not sure why you got so hassled by it. Really the point was a simple one.

You are trying to put a Muslim in difficult position by coming up with comparisons which indirectly question him are you with your Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) or the goons / idiots who tried to mock him.

Define Good Muslim folks for me please............. which you are trying to separate from others.

So reading up on Sharia is your research...... which books did you read? What was your source of information on Sharia?

And yes no Sharia for you or any other non Muslim, if you had researched properly you would have known Sharia can never be for a non Muslim and any Muslim who is trying or suggesting to implement it in non Muslim countries is as much illiterate about Sharia as you are.