Who is Fighting Who in Syria?

[HaiderAfan]

This is the same jewish girl.
To the left, she is in her IOF uniform.
To the right, she is protesting for a “Free Syria.”
When will the Muslim world learn that these people cannot be trusted?

 

[Akbar26]

Netanyahu Approves Plans to Expand Golan Heights Settlements
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has approved a significant plan to expand settlements in the Golan Heights, aiming to double the population of Israeli settlers in the region. This decision comes amid ongoing tensions and following the recent ousting of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Key Details​

1. Settlement Expansion Plan: The Israeli cabinet unanimously approved a budget exceeding 40 million shekels (approximately $11 million) for the initiative. The plan focuses on enhancing infrastructure and services in the Golan Heights, including education and renewable energy projects.
2. Demographic Growth: Netanyahu stated that strengthening the Golan Heights is crucial for Israel's security, particularly given the emergence of a "new front" following Assad's fall. The current population in the Golan Heights is around 50,000, with approximately half being Israeli settlers.
3. Historical Context: The Golan Heights has been under Israeli occupation since the 1967 Six-Day War and was formally annexed by Israel in 1981, a move not recognized by most of the international community. The area is strategically important due to its elevated terrain and water resources.
4. International Reactions: The expansion plan has drawn criticism from various countries, including Egypt and other Arab nations, which view it as a violation of Syria's sovereignty and an obstacle to peace in the region. Critics argue that such moves further entrench Israel's control over occupied territories.
5. Security Concerns: Netanyahu emphasized that bolstering the Golan settlements is essential for maintaining Israel's presence and security in light of recent developments in Syria, where rebel groups have gained ground.
6. Future Implications: This expansion is likely to exacerbate tensions between Israel and Syria, particularly as Israel continues its military operations against Iranian and Hezbollah positions within Syria. The situation remains fluid as regional dynamics evolve.

Conclusion​

Netanyahu's approval of plans to expand settlements in the Golan Heights marks a significant escalation in Israeli settlement policy amidst ongoing regional instability. As Israel seeks to solidify its presence in this contested area, the implications for peace and security in the region will be closely monitored by both local and international observers.

View attachment 1035476

Russia has reiterated its strong opposition to Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights, calling it "absolutely unacceptable." This statement was made by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkovduring an interview with TASS, where he cautioned against what he described as "hotheads" in Israel who might exploit the changing dynamics in Syria.

Key Points​

1. Historical Context: The Golan Heights, a strategically significant plateau, was captured by Israel during the 1967 Six-Day War and later annexed in 1981. The international community, with the notable exception of the United States, does not recognize Israel's sovereignty over the territory, which is considered part of Syria.
2. Russia's Position: Ryabkov emphasized that Russia does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, asserting that it remains an "inalienable part of Syria." He called for Israel to adhere to the 1974 disengagement agreement with Syria, which aimed to establish a buffer zone and prevent military confrontations.
3. Concerns Over Escalation: The Russian official warned that any attempts by Israel to further assert control over the Golan Heights could escalate tensions in the region. He highlighted that Israel should be cautious not to overestimate its leverage amid the ongoing instability in Syria.
4. Geopolitical Implications: Russia's condemnation of Israel's actions comes at a time when the Syrian conflict is evolving, particularly following significant changes in the Syrian government and military landscape. Ryabkov's remarks reflect Moscow's broader strategy of positioning itself as a key player in Middle Eastern geopolitics.
5. International Reactions: The issue of the Golan Heights remains contentious internationally. While the U.S. formally recognized Israeli sovereignty under the Trump administration in 2019, many countries and international organizations continue to view the annexation as a violation of international law.

Conclusion​

Russia's firm stance against Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights underscores ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region. As both countries navigate their interests amid shifting dynamics in Syria, Russia aims to assert its influence while advocating for adherence to international agreements regarding territorial integrity. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for regional stability and international relations.

 

[Akbar26]

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently visited Mount Hermon, a strategically significant area located in Syrian territory, where he addressed the ongoing military presence of Israeli forces. During his remarks, he stated, "We will not leave Mount Hermon until Israel’s security is fully guaranteed." This statement underscores Israel's commitment to maintaining control over the region, especially in light of recent geopolitical developments.

Key Points​

1. Strategic Importance of Mount Hermon:
   • Mount Hermon overlooks crucial areas, including Damascus, and serves as a critical observation point for Israeli defense operations. Netanyahu emphasized that the summit acts as "the eyes of the state of Israel" to monitor threats from nearby adversaries.
2. Military Presence:
   • The visit marks a significant moment as it appears to be the first time a sitting Israeli leader has set foot this far into Syria. Netanyahu confirmed that Israeli troops would remain in a newly established buffer zone within Syria until a suitable arrangement can be made to ensure Israel's security.
3. Context of the Visit:
   • The Israeli military has recently expanded its presence in southern Syria following the ousting of President Bashar al-Assad by rebel forces. This move has drawn criticism and accusations of violating international agreements, particularly regarding the 1974 ceasefire that established a demilitarized zone between Israel and Syria.
4. Statements from Officials:
   • Defense Minister Israel Katz accompanied Netanyahu during the visit and reiterated that Israel would maintain its military presence in the area "for as long as is required." He instructed the military to quickly establish fortifications in anticipation of a potentially extended stay.
5. International Reactions:
   • The establishment of this buffer zone and the ongoing Israeli military presence have sparked condemnation from various quarters, including U.N. officials who assert that such actions violate existing agreements regarding the region.

Conclusion​

Netanyahu's statements regarding Mount Hermon reflect Israel's ongoing strategy to secure its borders amid shifting dynamics in Syria. The commitment to remain in this strategically vital area highlights Israel's proactive stance on national security, particularly as regional tensions continue to evolve.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1869098277641355295

 

[HamzaWaseem]

Israel has recently escalated its military actions by launching airstrikes on Yemen's capital, Sanaa, targeting Houthi positions. This comes in direct response to a missile attack from the Houthis aimed at Israel, marking a significant increase in hostilities involving multiple regional actors.

Key Developments​

1. Airstrikes on Yemen:
   • On December 19, 2024, the Israeli military conducted airstrikes targeting Houthi military installations in Sanaa and the port city of Hodeidah. The strikes specifically targeted energy infrastructure and ports that the Houthis allegedly use for military purposes. Reports indicate that at least nine people have been killed as a result of these strikes, with additional injuries reported.
2. Houthi Missile Attack:
   • The airstrikes were initiated shortly after the Houthis launched a missile aimed at central Israel, which was intercepted by Israeli defense systems. This missile attack was part of a broader pattern of assaults from the Houthis, who have claimed their actions are in solidarity with Palestinians during the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
3. Israel's Broader Military Engagement:
   • Israel is currently engaged in military operations across multiple fronts, including Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine, in addition to Yemen. This multi-theater engagement underscores Israel's strategic focus on countering threats from Iranian-backed groups in the region.
4. Statements from Officials:
   • Israeli officials have warned that they will continue to target Houthi forces as necessary to protect their national security. Defense Minister Israel Katz stated that Israel's military actions are aimed at degrading the capabilities of what they term "terrorist organizations" operating against them.
5. International Reactions:
   • The escalation has raised concerns among international observers about the potential for a broader conflict in the Middle East. World leaders have expressed apprehension regarding the implications of increased military activity and its impact on regional stability.

Conclusion​

Israel's recent airstrikes on Yemen represent a significant escalation in its military operations against Iranian-aligned groups in the region. As hostilities continue across multiple fronts, the potential for further conflict remains high, with serious implications for regional security and humanitarian conditions in affected areas. The situation is evolving rapidly, and continued monitoring will be essential to understand its broader impacts.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1869575590430245329

 

[Akbar26]

On December 16, 2024, Israel conducted a significant airstrike on a weapons depot in Tartus, Syria, which has sparked widespread speculation regarding the use of a small tactical nuclear bomb. This incident is notable for the reported consequences and the implications it may have on regional security.

Key Details of the Incident​

1. Airstrike Overview:
   • The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) targeted a facility believed to house Scud missiles and other military equipment. The strike resulted in a massive explosion that was described as exceptionally loud, leading to concerns about the scale of destruction.
2. Evidence of Nuclear Use:
   • Following the airstrike, there were reports of elevated radiation levels detected in Cyprus and Mersin, Turkey, approximately 20 hours after the explosion. This spike in radiation has led to speculation that a nuclear device may have been used, potentially a tactical nuclear bomb.
3. Seismic Activity:
   • The explosion triggered an earthquake measuring 3.0 on the Richter scale, felt as far away as Iznik, Turkey, which is about 820 kilometers from Tartus. This seismic activity further fueled theories about the nature of the explosion.
4. Satellite Imagery and Environmental Impact:
   • Satellite images reportedly show significant alterations to the landscape, including a section of a mountain disappearing and vegetation within a one-kilometer radius being vaporized. These observations suggest an explosion of unprecedented magnitude for conventional munitions.
5. International Reactions:
   • The incident has raised alarm among international observers regarding Israel's military capabilities and its willingness to potentially use nuclear weapons in conflict scenarios. It also highlights ongoing tensions in the region following the recent ousting of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
6. Ongoing Military Operations:
   • The airstrike is part of Israel's broader strategy to undermine military capabilities in Syria, particularly those linked to Iran and its proxies. Israeli forces have conducted numerous operations in Syria over recent years, often targeting missile depots and military installations.

Conclusion​

The December 16 airstrike in Tartus has significant implications for regional stability and international security discussions surrounding nuclear weapon use. As investigations into the incident continue, it underscores the complexities of military engagements in Syria and raises critical questions about the future of conflict dynamics in the Middle East.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1873064001405386919