What's new

Who is Fighting Who in Syria?

.
What a disgrace this Syrian civil war is no?.......I'm warning all Pakistani's today that this is exactly the template the West will use to disintegrate us along ethnic/ sectarian lines, when the time comes.......make no mistake guys.

Bewaquff Pakistani don't see the threat to our country watching this Sy-Raaq drama.

Any Pakistani taking sides in this shit show of Syria is a fukking idiot!
 
.
What a disgrace this Syrian civil war is no?.......I'm warning all Pakistani's today that this is exactly the template the West will use to disintegrate us along ethnic/ sectarian lines, when the time comes.......make no mistake guys.

Bewaquff Pakistani don't see the threat to our country watching this Sy-Raaq drama.

Any Pakistani taking sides in this shit show of Syria is a fukking idiot!
As an outsider, Pakistanis do not come across as revolutionaries.

I don't think civil wars, as in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Mali, Sudan and Somalia, which tore those countries apart will likely happen in Pakistan.
 
.
They should appeal to Syrian soldiers to desert or switch sides.
They just did.
This is the outcome of mass murder, destruction of homes, persecution, repression, torture, rape, injustice, and refugees over decades. It created a mass of population willing to fight indefinitely.
 
.
The madman of Syria did not understand that when millions of Syrian refugees are forced into Turkey, then Turkey has a right to interfere in Syria. Heck, Turkey could have declared war on Assad regime for that reason. It is not Turkey's or any other country's job to house and feed millions of Syrians, but they did anyway despite costing billions per year, causing political, social, economic problems in Turkey. Islamophobia went through the roof in Europe/West, creating powerful far-right neofascists who are very zionist.
 
. .
Pretty much the whole middle east has the culture of worshipping nasty idol rulers and nasty priests for thousands of years.
 
.
Bashar al-Assad, the former President of Syria, and his family have reportedly arrived in Moscow after being granted asylum by Russian authorities. This development follows significant military advances by opposition forces, which led to the fall of Damascus and the end of Assad's long-standing rule.

Key Details:​

  1. Asylum Granted: According to multiple Russian news outlets, including TASS and Interfax, Assad was granted asylum on "humanitarian grounds" as his regime faced a swift offensive from rebel forces. This marks a dramatic turn in the Syrian conflict, which has lasted over a decade.
  2. Departure from Syria: Reports indicate that Assad left Damascus shortly before the rebels declared the city liberated. The Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed that he had resigned from the presidency and departed Syria, facilitating a peaceful transfer of power amid the chaos.
  3. Evacuation Details: It is believed that Assad was evacuated by a Russian aircraft from a military base in Latakia, Syria. His exit came as opposition forces closed in on the capital, leading to celebrations among civilians who viewed this as a liberation from his authoritarian rule.
  4. International Reactions: President Joe Biden commented on the situation, describing Assad's regime's collapse as a significant act of justice for the Syrian people. The international community is closely monitoring the implications of this power shift for regional stability and future governance in Syria.
  5. Historical Context: This event concludes over 50 years of al-Assad family rule in Syria, which began with Hafez al-Assad in 1970. The Syrian civil war has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions displaced, fundamentally altering the country's demographic and political landscape.

Conclusion:​

The arrival of Bashar al-Assad and his family in Moscow signifies a pivotal moment in the Syrian conflict, marking the end of an era characterized by authoritarian rule and widespread violence. As opposition forces celebrate their victory, the future of Syria remains uncertain, with potential challenges related to governance, security, and humanitarian needs looming large. The international community will likely play a crucial role in shaping post-conflict recovery and stability efforts in the region.
 
.
Bashar al-Assad, the former President of Syria, and his family have reportedly arrived in Moscow after being granted asylum by Russian authorities. This development follows significant military advances by opposition forces, which led to the fall of Damascus and the end of Assad's long-standing rule.

Key Details:​

  1. Asylum Granted: According to multiple Russian news outlets, including TASS and Interfax, Assad was granted asylum on "humanitarian grounds" as his regime faced a swift offensive from rebel forces. This marks a dramatic turn in the Syrian conflict, which has lasted over a decade.
  2. Departure from Syria: Reports indicate that Assad left Damascus shortly before the rebels declared the city liberated. The Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed that he had resigned from the presidency and departed Syria, facilitating a peaceful transfer of power amid the chaos.
  3. Evacuation Details: It is believed that Assad was evacuated by a Russian aircraft from a military base in Latakia, Syria. His exit came as opposition forces closed in on the capital, leading to celebrations among civilians who viewed this as a liberation from his authoritarian rule.
  4. International Reactions: President Joe Biden commented on the situation, describing Assad's regime's collapse as a significant act of justice for the Syrian people. The international community is closely monitoring the implications of this power shift for regional stability and future governance in Syria.
  5. Historical Context: This event concludes over 50 years of al-Assad family rule in Syria, which began with Hafez al-Assad in 1970. The Syrian civil war has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions displaced, fundamentally altering the country's demographic and political landscape.

Conclusion:​

The arrival of Bashar al-Assad and his family in Moscow signifies a pivotal moment in the Syrian conflict, marking the end of an era characterized by authoritarian rule and widespread violence. As opposition forces celebrate their victory, the future of Syria remains uncertain, with potential challenges related to governance, security, and humanitarian needs looming large. The international community will likely play a crucial role in shaping post-conflict recovery and stability efforts in the region.

Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, the leader of the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), has emerged as a pivotal figure in Syria following a rapid military campaign that led to the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad. His forces successfully seized control of Damascus in a swift offensive, marking a significant turning point in the Syrian conflict.

Key Developments:​

  1. Historic Victory: Al-Jolani declared a "historic" victory from the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, emphasizing that this moment represents a triumph for the entire Islamic nation. He highlighted the sacrifices made by those who fought against Assad's regime and positioned himself as a leader advocating for sectarian tolerance and pluralism, distancing himself from his past associations with Al-Qaeda.
  2. Shift in Power Dynamics: The fall of Assad marks the end of over 50 years of authoritarian rule by his family. Reports indicate that Assad has fled to Moscow, signaling a dramatic shift in Syria's political landscape. Al-Jolani's rise to power reflects a broader transformation within rebel factions, as they seek to establish governance amidst ongoing instability.
  3. Geopolitical Implications: In his speeches, al-Jolani has made pointed references to Iran, suggesting that Tehran's influence in Syria is waning. This could have significant implications for regional dynamics, particularly concerning Iranian support for proxy groups in Syria and Lebanon.
  4. Future Governance: Al-Jolani has expressed intentions to create a government based on institutions and democratic principles, promising safety for minority communities that may fear extremist governance. His ability to unify various factions and maintain stability will be crucial as he navigates the complexities of post-Assad Syria.
  5. International Reactions: U.S. President Joe Biden acknowledged al-Jolani's statements but emphasized that his future actions would define his leadership. The international community is closely monitoring these developments, as they could influence broader geopolitical strategies in the Middle East.

Conclusion:​

Abu Mohammed al-Jolani's emergence as a leader following the collapse of Assad's regime signifies a pivotal moment in Syria's protracted civil war. As he seeks to consolidate power and govern a diverse population, the implications for regional stability and international relations remain significant. The future of Syria will depend on al-Jolani's ability to navigate these challenges while fostering an inclusive political environment.

1733726094729.png
 
.
Bashar al-Assad, the former President of Syria, had a brief medical career as an ophthalmologist in London before transitioning into politics. Between 1990 and 1994, he worked at the Western Eye Hospital, where he was described as reserved and intellectual. His colleagues praised him for his humility and ability to reassure patients before anesthesia. However, his medical career was abruptly cut short when he was recalled to Syria after the death of his older brother, Basel, in a car accident in 1994.

Key Points:​

  1. Medical Background:
    • Al-Assad graduated from medical school in Syria and began his postgraduate training in ophthalmology in London. He was known for his technical skills and compassionate approach to patient care.
  2. Family Tragedy:
    • The death of Basel al-Assad, who was being groomed to succeed their father, Hafez al-Assad, prompted Bashar's return to Syria. This event marked a significant turning point in his life, leading to his preparation for political leadership.
  3. Political Ascendancy:
    • Upon returning to Syria, Bashar was quickly positioned as a potential successor to his father. State propaganda began to elevate his public image as "the hope of the masses," preparing him for leadership amid the Assad family's longstanding rule.
  4. Transition to Leadership:
    • After Hafez al-Assad's death in 2000, Bashar assumed the presidency. Initially, there were hopes for reform and modernization under his leadership; however, he soon adopted authoritarian practices similar to those of his father.
  5. Legacy:
    • Over the years, Bashar al-Assad became synonymous with oppression and brutality during the Syrian civil war, which began in 2011. His regime faced international condemnation for widespread human rights abuses, including the use of chemical weapons against civilians.
  6. Recent Developments:
    • As of late 2024, Assad's regime has faced significant challenges from rebel forces, culminating in a recent offensive that led to the capture of major cities including Damascus. Reports suggest that Assad has fled to Russia amidst this upheaval.

Conclusion:​

Bashar al-Assad's journey from a promising medical career in London to becoming one of the most controversial leaders in modern history illustrates the complex interplay of personal tragedy and political fate. His legacy is marked by a brutal civil war that has devastated Syria and drawn international attention to issues of governance and human rights in the region.

1733726708291.jpeg
 
.
Israeli Major General (Res.) Noam Tibon:

Israel is very interested in establishing a Kurdish state in Syria.

1733734288799.jpeg
 
.
In a significant development following the recent capture of Damascus by Syrian rebel forces, it has been reported that a faction linked to Al-Qaeda has announced a $10 million reward for anyone who helps capture President Bashar al-Assad. This announcement underscores the ongoing volatility in Syria and the shifting power dynamics after the fall of Assad's regime.

Key Points:​

  1. Background of the Announcement:
    • The reward is part of a broader strategy by groups such as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which has historical ties to Al-Qaeda. This move reflects their commitment to removing Assad from power and consolidating control over areas previously governed by his regime.
  2. Current Situation in Syria:
    • Following a swift military offensive, rebel forces have successfully captured key cities, including Damascus, marking a dramatic turn in the Syrian civil war. Reports suggest that Assad has fled the capital, with various sources indicating he may have sought refuge in Russia.
  3. Al-Jolani's Leadership:
    • Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, the leader of HTS, has positioned himself as a prominent figure in the post-Assad landscape. His rhetoric emphasizes the need for a new governance structure in Syria, aiming to present HTS as a legitimate political entity despite its controversial past.
  4. International Reactions:
    • The announcement of the reward for Assad's capture has drawn mixed reactions internationally, with concerns about the potential for further violence and instability in Syria. The situation remains fluid, and the involvement of extremist factions complicates efforts for a peaceful resolution.
  5. Implications for Regional Security:
    • The ongoing conflict and the potential for an intensified pursuit of Assad could lead to increased tensions not only within Syria but also with neighboring countries and global powers that have vested interests in the region.

Conclusion:​

The declaration of a $10 million reward for Bashar al-Assad's capture highlights the precarious situation in Syria following the recent upheaval. As rebel forces consolidate their gains and seek to establish new governance structures, the implications for both national stability and regional security remain profound. The international community will be closely monitoring these developments as they unfold.

1733742135818.png
 
. .
Israeli ground forces have overtly crossed into Syrian territory for the first time since the 1973 October War, marking a significant shift in Israel's military engagement in the region. This move coincides with the ongoing turmoil following the collapse of President Bashar al-Assad's regime, as rebel factions gain ground.

Key Developments:​

  1. Israeli Military Incursion:
    • Israeli troops have entered the demilitarized buffer zone along the Israel-Syria border, securing strategic locations including Mount Hermon. This is described as a proactive measure to prevent hostile forces from establishing a presence near Israel's borders amid the chaos in Syria.
  2. Official Statements:
    • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that this deployment is aimed at ensuring Israel's security and preventing any hostile entities from operating near its borders. He characterized the situation as a necessary response to the vacuum created by Assad's regime's downfall.
  3. Temporary Presence:
    • Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar emphasized that the presence of Israeli forces in Syrian territory is a "limited, temporary" measure focused solely on national security interests. This statement reflects Israel's intent to maintain a defensive posture while navigating the complexities of the Syrian conflict.
  4. Military Operations:
    • In addition to ground maneuvers, the Israeli Air Force has conducted strikes against military targets in Syria, including weapons depots and missile systems, to prevent these assets from falling into the hands of rebel factions that could pose a threat to Israel.
  5. Reactions and Implications:
    • The incursion has raised concerns among various stakeholders regarding potential escalations in regional tensions. The international community remains watchful of Israel's actions, particularly in light of its historical claims over the Golan Heights, which it captured during the 1967 war and subsequently annexed.
  6. UN Involvement:
    • The United Nations peacekeeping force (UNDOF) has reported sightings of armed individuals near its positions in Syria, highlighting the precarious security situation in the area and complicating efforts to maintain peace.

Conclusion:​

The recent entry of Israeli forces into Syrian territory marks a notable escalation in Israel's military involvement amid the ongoing instability following Assad's regime collapse. As Israel seeks to secure its borders and counter potential threats from militant groups, the situation remains fluid and could have significant implications for regional security dynamics. The international community will be closely monitoring these developments as they unfold.

1733746809250.jpeg
1733746831517.png
 
.
Israeli ground forces have made a significant military incursion into Syrian territory for the first time since the 1973 October War, crossing the demilitarized zone along the Israel-Syria border. This operation, which involved securing strategic locations such as Mount Hermon, marks a notable shift in Israel's military posture amid the ongoing turmoil following the collapse of President Bashar al-Assad'sregime.

Key Developments:​

  1. Military Incursion:
    • Israeli troops crossed into the demilitarized buffer zone and seized control of Mount Hermon and other critical positions. This move is described as a proactive measure to prevent hostile forces from establishing a presence near Israel's borders, particularly in light of recent developments in Syria where rebel factions have gained significant ground.
  2. Official Statements:
    • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that he ordered the military to secure these positions, stating, "We directed the Israeli army to secure these positions to prevent any hostile forces from establishing themselves adjacent to the Israeli border." He emphasized that this deployment is a temporary defensive measure until a more stable arrangement can be reached.
  3. Targeting Military Assets:
    • In conjunction with ground operations, the Israeli Air Force conducted airstrikes against various military targets within Syria. These strikes focused on dismantling chemical weapons stockpiles, missile caches, and air defense systems to prevent them from falling into rebel hands. Reports indicate that these operations targeted facilities believed to house chemical agents like mustard gas and VX gas, as well as radar-equipped missile batteries.
  4. Context of the Operation:
    • The incursion comes amid a rapid offensive by anti-regime forces that led to the ousting of Assad from power and the capture of Damascus. As Syrian troops vacated their posts, Israeli officials expressed concerns about potential instability and the rise of militant groups that could threaten Israel's security.
  5. Curfews and Local Impact:
    • The Israeli military announced curfews for several Syrian villages within the buffer zone, instructing residents to remain indoors "until further notice." This precautionary measure aims to maintain control over the area and mitigate any potential unrest stemming from the military operations.
  6. International Reactions:
    • The international community is closely monitoring these developments, particularly given Israel's historical claims over the Golan Heights, which it captured during the 1967 war. While Israel maintains that its actions are defensive and aimed at protecting its citizens, there are concerns about escalating tensions in an already volatile region.
  7. Historical Context:
    • The last significant Israeli military presence in Syria was during the Yom Kippur War in 1973. Since then, Israel has conducted numerous airstrikes against Iranian and Hezbollah targets within Syria but has not deployed ground troops until now. The recent actions signal a potential shift in Israel's operational strategy as it seeks to adapt to changing dynamics following Assad's regime collapse.

Conclusion:​

The entry of Israeli troops into Syria represents a pivotal moment in regional security dynamics, reflecting Israel's proactive approach to safeguarding its borders amid escalating conflict in neighboring Syria. As tensions mount and rebel groups gain strength, Israel's military strategy will likely continue to evolve in response to emerging threats. The situation remains fluid, with implications for both local populations and broader geopolitical relations in the Middle East.

 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom