What's new

Whiteness of Shaheen Shah Afridi put under the spotlight by world's biggest alt-right website

Have you seen the Pakistanis who get routinely rounded up in sex gang raids in the UK? Not a single one of them are fair skinned Pashtuns...this is why I am saying there needs to be concerted effort to in crease white blonde Pashtun emigration rate and a need to curb non-white emigration rates from Pakistan
bro, light blonde types are minority in lightest region of country but they do form visible minority there, pakistanis from all groups are dark haired dark eyeed population and they look good in their own way(this is coming from someonee who has visited many countries and lived all over pakistan), it would be matter of time pakistan will find its niche on global beauty spectrum, its good to find your own niche than become B copy of some pseudo euro look.

Also, Pakistani Punjabis and Sindhis are racially different to indians of the same name. The ONLY similarity being language. As a Pakistani Punjabi, I have FAR more in common with a Pakistani Balouch, Pathan or Kalash. I have nothing in common with or feel ANY connection with an indian Punjabi.
yes pakistanis from all groups form there own genetic cluster for the bulk (though large outliers also exist) , an iranic pakistani is not iranian , like an indic pakistan is not indian.
 
.
Yes because for thousands of years there existed a line east of which people became different then west ...
There was a story that at a house between border of india and pakistan a mother gave birth to two sons .. .black and another white .. black one was raised on eastern room while whiter one on western room... "True story"




For 1000s of years, the area that is now Pakistan was a central part of a nation that spanned Iran and Afghanistan, so what's your point?

Being a part of the British Raj/Empire between 1843 to 1947, doesn't make Pakistanis and indians the same people or have in anything in common.

Ever wondered why a Pakistani Punjabi, Pathan or Balouch have 0 in common with central or south indians?
 
.
bro, light blonde types are minority in lightest region of country but they do form visible minority there, pakistanis from all groups are dark haired dark eyeed population and they look good in their own way(this is coming from someonee who has visited many countries and lived all over pakistan), it would be matter of time pakistan will find its niche on global beauty spectrum, its good to find your own niche than become B copy of some pseudo euro look.


yes pakistanis from all groups form there own genetic cluster for the bulk (though large outliers also exist) , an iranic pakistani is not iranian , like an indic pakistan is not indian.
My question is just like indic and iranic is there a pakid ?

For 1000s of years, the area that is now Pakistan was a central part of a nation that spanned Iran and Afghanistan, so what's your point?

Being a part of the British Raj/Empire between 1843 to 1947, doesn't make Pakistanis and indians the same people or have in anything in common.

Ever wondered why a Pakistani Punjabi, Pathan or Balouch have 0 in common with central or south indians?
Actally in my city there are many people from rawalpindi , lahore, Peshawar
And i'll be honest they do look different
Not beacuse they are fair ... (Which they are but so are we )
But their features are different
 
.
Yes because for thousands of years there existed a line east of which people became different then west ...
There was a story that at a house between border of india and pakistan a mother gave birth to two sons .. .black and another white .. black one was raised on eastern room while whiter one on western room... "True story"
This is correct but remember , the areas that make current Pakistan were 95%-99% muslim even during pre-partition time and there was little to no admixture with Hindus due to religious prohibition. Most of the foreign invasions usually stopped at the borders of Punjab and their mixture with native muslim population due to similar religion made it very possible for genetic diversity to happen.

Even if Indian subcontinent was one place, inter-religious marriage rarely happened hence there was no mixture b/w Hindus and muslims so your claim that we are same is very incorrect. If we didn't even mix with you during pre-partition time and actually wanted a separate country , what makes you think we are like you ?
 
.
My question is just like indic and iranic is there a pakid ?
no but there is genetics, linguistics is is just one aspect of determining genetic , geography is far bigger factor in genetics than language. A turk from anatolia look different from central asian turkic
 
.
no but there is genetics, linguistics is is just one aspect of determining genetic , geography is far bigger factor in genetics than language. A turk from anatolia look different from central asian turkic
A "turk" form anatolia has only 10-15% turkish genes from "Altai mountains"
 
. . . .
A "turk" form anatolia has only 10-15% turkish genes from "Altai mountains"
no doubt we share much with caucasoid/high cast indians , but low cast/tribal populations in india is breeding at rapid rate and differences between both countries are increasing. Obviously you can find pakistanis that look tamil but when you take populations as a whole you will realize what I am talking about.
 
.
This is correct but remember , the areas that make current Pakistan were 95%-99% muslim even during pre-partition time and there was little to no admixture with Hindus due to religious prohibition. Most of the foreign invasions usually stopped at the borders of Punjab and their mixture with native muslim population due to similar religion made it very possible for genetic diversity to happen.

Even if Indian subcontinent was one place, inter-religious marriage rarely happened hence there was no mixture b/w Hindus and muslims so your claim that we are same is very incorrect. If we didn't even mix with you during pre-partition time and actually wanted a separate country , what makes you think we are like you ?
While you guys tell us all about pakistan a country of 200 million in detail ...
Why you confidently forget that india is also diverse ( much more so )... a nation of 1400 million inhabitants ....
That is what my real question is ...

no doubt we share much with caucasoid/high cast indians , but low cast/tribal populations in india is breeding at rapid rate and differences between both countries are increasing. Obviously you can find pakistanis that look tamil but when you take populations as a whole you will realize what I am talking about.
I'll tell you what i think you can correct me ...
Punjabi from lahore and surrounding area is different from punjabi from south punjab ...
Pashtuns are very different from indians
Sindhis are closest to indians and balochis the farthest . ..
 
.
You really think a single one of the modern nation states would survive 21st century? the coming Global collapse of Bond event plus Global warming

That is very legit concern but time will tell but assuming the best , I say that Pakistan will need at least 100-250 more years to be recognized as a different racial group entirely.
 
.
For 1000s of years, the area that is now Pakistan was a central part of a nation that spanned Iran and Afghanistan, so what's your point?

Being a part of the British Raj/Empire between 1843 to 1947, doesn't make Pakistanis and indians the same people or have in anything in common.

Ever wondered why a Pakistani Punjabi, Pathan or Balouch have 0 in common with central or south indians?
Nahh i have much more important things to wonder ...
But have you ever wondered that why it is you take genetic test you will have 30-40% south indian
(ASI) gene in you ( assuming you are punjabi or sindhi)
 
.
While you guys tell us all about pakistan a country of 200 million in detail ...
Why you confidently forget that india is also diverse ( much more so )... a nation of 1400 million inhabitants ....
That is what my real question is ...

You see and I will not be politically correct on this ...

Diversity is only celebrated if it leads to good looking and sharp featured race.

Indians unfortunately severely lack in that department. You can claim a million different races within your country but if all of them are ugly and short with some variations of black colour .... I am sorry nobody will take you seriously .

Nahh i have much more important things to wonder ...
But have you ever wondered that why it is you take genetic test you will have 30-40% south indian
(ASI) gene in you ( assuming you are punjabi or sindhi)

I am glad it is not 100% south Indian gene. Now that would be concerning... Anything below 50% is good.
 
.
You see and I will not be politically correct on this ...

Diversity is only celebrated if it leads to good looking and sharp featured race.

Indians unfortunately severely lack in that department. You can claim a million different races within your country but if all of them are ugly and short with some variation among black colour .... I am sorry nobody will take you seriously .
Cool and I don't feel offended cause i don't fit that description ....
Feel free to search pahari people ...
Thing is you guys dont dont know people like us exist ...
Anyway a black sri sankan has 10 times percapita income then a white afghan
...
So you know i'll take my chances on sri lankan dude
 
.
Back
Top Bottom