What's new

Which is more powerful? Russia or NATO?

Which is more powerful?


  • Total voters
    28
.
That's like comparing a Ferrari (NATO) with Lada (Russia).

Ferrari 458 Italia
1024px-Ferrari_458_Italia_--_05-18-2011.jpg


Lada Riva


1024px-Lada_2107_aka_Lada_Riva_October_1995_1452cc.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
If the US is more powerful then the nrs 2 to 15 of the worlds most powerful countries combined,what kind of a question would this be?
 
.
If the US is more powerful then the nrs 2 to 15 of the worlds most powerful countries combined,what kind of a question would this be?


How so? The US has no chance against ISIS who are really scary folks :o:
 
. . .
How so? The US has no chance against ISIS who are really scary folks :o:
You should learn a thing or two about world politics,Iraq(ISIS territory) is no Afghanistan where they can hide in caves.
If the US wanted,they could have ''deleted'' ISIS in a week,just a couple of bombs needed.
 
.
You should learn a thing or two about world politics,Iraq(ISIS territory) is no Afghanistan where they can hide in caves.
If the US wanted,they could have ''deleted'' ISIS in a week,just a couple of bombs needed.


After 10 years in Iraq and suffering nearly 40,000 dead or amputated, talk to the Iraq War veterans. You might learn a thing or two :enjoy:
 
.
I would say its so crazy to any nation or organization to trouble it's self with Russia.

it's not about comparing leopard to T-90. It's about how many tanks the Russian can field vs the NATO.

and how many casualties can the NATO bear in such war vs the Russians.

My conclusion is that Russian will be able to smash the western Europe within a year and seize it to exist for the next few decades as a world power.

The Russians still can produce more hardware than the west with adequate quality to make it hard for the west to stop it from inflicting heavy casualties.

remember this is Russia not Iraq neither Syria that you can mess with and then you can get away with it intact.

The only game changer is the USA. But even this super power wont do much against Russia since this country possess some top notch tech in air-defense systems, let's also not forget its air power with the very advanced Su-35 and MiG-35 plus the T-50. so that's not something like middle east that's a giant bear that is so busy finding food. It's not wise irritate it.

any way I am fully eager for some real actions to watch.
 
.
The wars of the future will not be won by masses of soldiers and tanks like they were +/-50 years ago, but by better technology and weapons..
It also depends on the professionalism of the soldiers.
 
Last edited:
.

Was Leopard 2A6 demonstrated at 2011 like the T-90MS? How about the Leopard 2NG which is as young as T-90MS? Thus Leo 2A7 can get medieval on T-90MS anyways. None of Russian&Chinese tanks can match with NATO's advanced tanks, none of those below are a match, not even one of them. As @SUPARCO said; it's like Ferrari versus Lada.

MİTÜP Altay (TUR) :

sn-jpg.36545


Aselsan Leopard 2NG (TUR) :

31yhmlg.jpg


Challenger 2 (UK) :

Challenger2-Iraq.jpg


Leopard 2A7 (GER) :

leopard_2a7.jpg


AMX Leclerc (FRA) :

Leclerc-IMG_1744-b.jpg


Leopard 2E (SPA) :

Leopardo_2E._zaragoza_1.jpg


M1A2 Abrams (USA) :

MIA2%20Abrams...jpg
 
. . .
Nato has the numerical, and technological advantage.

The u,s already has more troops than russia. Add turkey, Britain, germany, france etc. and you are already at like 4 million +.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom