khair_ctg
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,084
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
sorry LaBong historical facts don't depend on your politicised narrow views. and we're having different definitions of "significant" and "flourish". consider this, acknowledging Urdu/Hindustani heritage of Bengal or Bengalis (Muslim or not) won't do any harm to anyone's appreciation of Sanskrit Bengali traditions. it would only have positive effect on the richness of your lands and your psychesThey mainly composed in Persian, their Urdu works are insignificant. One of them related to Baghdadi Sufi family of Suharawardis and another Kashmiri marchent family of Dhaka Nawab. Like I said, Persian was the language of court during Nawab's time and educated Muslims followed the "tradition" in Persian. Even Iqbal had his majority of work in Persian. Urdu never flourished in Bengal, if you think it is otherwise then obviously you are misinformed.
I have nothing against Urdu/Hindustani. In fact the very first major literary work of your much-hated Tagore was in Braj-Bhasa which is very close to Hindustani and used extensively in Hindustani classical music, however the idea of Urdu being "patronized" and "traditionally" spoken in all educated Muslim families is simply incorrect.
There was no Musalmani Bangla except in mind of revisionists. Before mass absorption of Tatsama words in Bengali, it was mainly Magadhi Prakrit based language with indigenous Desi vocabulary.