What's new

Which countries would benefit greatly from a US backed regime change in Iran?

Which countries would benefit greatly from a US backed regime change in Iran?

  • Israel

  • Iraq

  • Pakistan

  • Saudi Arabia

  • Syria

  • Afghanistan

  • India

  • China

  • Turkey

  • Yemen


Results are only viewable after voting.

Maira La

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
4,936
Reaction score
1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Thailand
Please vote. Honesty is appreciated.

I voted for Israel, KSA and India.
 
.
Only Israel because pro-Israel Iranians will come back to power.
It won't benefit Arabs because the new Iranian regime will be 10 times more anti-Arab. The Islamic republic is at least a Muslim country that talks about Islamic brotherhood, while a new Iranian regime will be a pro-Western, anti-Islam, anti-Arab system. Iran under the Shah or today's Turkey are good examples of how a pro-West Iran will make Arabs lose the region to Iran even more. As for most other countries, there won't be a significant change.
 
.
Israel.

KSA was currently being splitted into pieces by ISIS if Iran didn't stop them on their borders. It is a fact that ISIS makers tried to destabilize Iran first before other Middle eastern countries but others wouldve fallen also one after an other like a domino.

Pakistan and China will have significant losses followed by a regime change in Iran. A US-India-Iran alliance could surround them both. USA could block oil Flow to energy hungry China. China is the engine of world economy and without energy resources, it has to offer Americans with huge consessions.
 
.
US will be the biggest beneficiary.
 
.
Only Israel because pro-Israel Iranians will come back to power.
It won't benefit Arabs because the new Iranian regime will be 10 times more anti-Arab. The Islamic republic is at least a Muslim country that talks about Islamic brotherhood, while a new Iranian regime will be a pro-Western, anti-Islam, anti-Arab system. Iran under the Shah or today's Turkey are good examples of how a pro-West Iran will make Arabs lose the region to Iran even more. As for most other countries, there won't be a significant change.

I disagree about Arabs. The Arab monarchs don't care about anti-Arab. They see Iran's cross border religious influence as threats to their monarchy. A nationalist Iranian government will not have this influence.

Israel basically wants an emasculated Iran. No nukes and no military technological edge. As long as these two conditions are met, they could care less which government rules Iran.

India and US want easy access, both civilian and military, to Central Asia and Afghanistan. They both share overlapping interest in the region. So obviously a US puppet government benefits both.
 
.
I disagree about Arabs. The Arab monarchs don't care about anti-Arab. They see Iran's cross border religious influence as threats to their monarchy. A nationalist Iranian government will not have this influence.

Israel basically wants an emasculated Iran. No nukes and no military technological edge. As long as these two conditions are met, they could care less which government rules Iran.

India and US want easy access, both civilian and military, to Central Asia and Afghanistan. They both share overlapping interest in the region. So obviously a US puppet government benefits both.
A nationalist Iran will be like Today's Turkey under Erdogan that is present in Syria, Iraq and Libya, only much stronger. They will like a pro-West Iran much less than today's Turkey. A pro-West Iran will dominate the region militarily just like the time of the Shah.

Israel prefers a strong Iran that can stand against Arabs and keeps them busy. Meanwhile, Iranians in exile are extremely pro-Israel and have strong ties with Zionists. They're also extremely anti-Islam and Muslims. The regime of Shah is a very good example of that, except the Islamophobia which will be 100 times more. Iran would've never been sold F14s or nuclear reactors working with 90% enriched uranium if Israel felt threatened by us. Mossad trained SAVAK agents during the Shah and we shared intelligence with each other regularly.

The United States would be interested in Iran's mineral and energy resources, as well as cheap labor force and our huge market for consumerism. India will not benefit much from this in any significant way.
 
.
I disagree about Arabs. The Arab monarchs don't care about anti-Arab. They see Iran's cross border religious influence as threats to their monarchy. A nationalist Iranian government will not have this influence.

Israel basically wants an emasculated Iran. No nukes and no military technological edge. As long as these two conditions are met, they could care less which government rules Iran.

India and US want easy access, both civilian and military, to Central Asia and Afghanistan. They both share overlapping interest in the region. So obviously a US puppet government benefits both.
India has no issues with current Iran regime and would not want a puppet unstable regime. The only roadblock for enhanced ties with Iran are US sanctions. Once those go away, we will see more work on Chahbahar, INSTC, oil trade etc.
 
.
well, there's three.

1. Israel
2. Israel
3. Israel

There might be a fourth but I can't think of it now.
 
.
Considering what has happened in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya...... bunch of other countries. USA doesn't have a good track record on regime change in the ME. Iran would descend into factional fighting. Biggest winners would be Afghanistan, since USA would probably back a Kabul regime invasion of Iran. The Afghans would get access to the sea.... But Kabul regime is pretty incompetent. They would probably lose. Iranians would unite to fight them. Regime change dream over.
 
Last edited:
.
A nationalist Iran will be like Today's Turkey under Erdogan that is present in Syria, Iraq and Libya, only much stronger. They will like a pro-West Iran much less than today's Turkey. A pro-West Iran will dominate the region militarily just like the time of the Shah.

Israel prefers a strong Iran that can stand against Arabs and keeps them busy. Meanwhile, Iranians in exile are extremely pro-Israel and have strong ties with Zionists. They're also extremely anti-Islam and Muslims. The regime of Shah is a very good example of that, except the Islamophobia which will be 100 times more. Iran would've never been sold F14s or nuclear reactors working with 90% enriched uranium if Israel felt threatened by us. Mossad trained SAVAK agents during the Shah and we shared intelligence with each other regularly.

The United States would be interested in Iran's mineral and energy resources, as well as cheap labor force and our huge market for consumerism. India will not benefit much from this in any significant way.

This is just what if aboutism.. democractic iran or not all the same it will never dominate the MENA region like pre-islam sassinds time. It never happned and won't happen again.

There is just to many players who wanna move into different position regardless.. Even a united west can't enforce itself there so if they can't do it Iranians chances are null and void in the region
 
.
This is just what if aboutism.. democractic iran or not all the same it will never dominate the MENA region like pre-islam sassinds time. It never happned and won't happen again.

There is just to many players who wanna move into different position to it regardless.. Even a united west can't enforce itself there
Democratic Iran or not, arabs even as a group will not dominate the region as long as Iran, Turkey and Israel are here. Even Pakistan has a better chance than Arabs.

And anyone with a bit of historical knowledge about Iran under the Shah can predict what a pro-West Iran will be like.
 
.
Democratic Iran or not, arabs even as a group will not dominate the region as long as Iran, Turkey and Israel are here.

The biggest misconception in the history of PDF is Israel. That is one overrated country in here.. Israel pose no threat in the region whatsoever. It didn't do that even back in the 67 as some nowadays claim it was an Israel success? Have you ever seen a war stop in 6 days and the otherside pulling out unanimously? It is because they got some serious threats coming from Washtington and the west to pull out or face a massive war and they pulled out this is what really happened but the narrative has been messed up so much that truth is lost.

Israel is to tiny and anyone who thinks it poses any threat by itself is out of his mind but the threat was always what lays beyond it in the west. They made sure it keeps existing..

Iran is not a threat either it is not fully fledged out to confront a unified Arab army consisting of 15-16. In fact nobody can except Turkey and that is only due to the Turkic Council.

I don't think the arabs are moving that direction tho Iran is the main target and as they have been provocative and has shown enimosty.

A war with Iran is a certainity now and this is just the mobilization period
 
Last edited:
.
The biggest misconception in the history of PDF is Israel. That is one overrated country in here.. Israel pose no threat in the region whatsoever. It didn't do that even back in the 67 as some nowadays claim it was an Israel success? Have you ever seen a war stop in 6 days and the otherside pulling out unanimously? It is because they got some serious threats coming from Washtington and the west to pull out of face a massive war and they pulled out this is what really happened but the narrative has been messed up so much that truth is lost.

Israel is to tiny and anyone who thinks it poses any threat by itself is out of his mind but the threat was always what lays beyond it.

Iran is not a threat either it is not fully fledged out to confront a unified Arab army consisting of 15-16. In fact nobody can except Turkey and that is only due to the Turkic Council.

I don't think the arabs are moving that direction tho Iran is the main target and as they have been provocative and has shown enimosty.

A war with Iran is a certainity now and this is just the mobilization period
LOL. Dude, Israel crushed Arabs in 6 days in such a humiliating way that still after decades haunts Arabs. It was a decisive victory for Israel and you're taking pride in the 6 day war? Like wtf? Seriously?

Tiny or not, Israel is the representative of the US interests in the region. As long as the United States is a super power, Israel will remain an important player in the region. Not because it has any power on her own, but because it has the unconditional support of the United States.

Well, apparently your Saudi friends disagree with you because they decided to start negotiations with Iran in Iraq, a country that is widely under the Iranian influence at the moment. And Iran is currently present in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and the Gaza strip while Saudis have failed to secure even the poorest country in the region after 5 years of war. Not to mention that our ties with Qatar is so strong that Qatar literally said no to you even when you threatened to severe your ties with her.

The region has 3 important players at the moment: 1- Iran, 2- Turkey, 3- Israel. Period.
 
.
LOL. Dude, Israel crushed Arabs in 6 days in such a humiliating way that still after decades haunts Arabs. It was a decisive victory for Israel and you're taking pride in the 6 day war? Like wtf? Seriously?

Tiny or not, Israel is the representative of the US interests in the region. As long as the United States is a super power, Israel will remain an important player in the region. Not because it has any power on her own, but because it has the unconditional support of the United States.

Well, apparently your Saudi friends disagree with you because they decided to start negotiations with Iran in Iraq, a country that is widely under the Iranian influence at the moment. And Iran is currently present in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and the Gaza strip while Saudis have failed to secure even the poorest country in the region after 5 years of war. Not to mention that our ties with Qatar is so strong that Qatar literally said no to you even when you threatened to severe your ties with her.

The region has 3 important players at the moment: 1- Iran, 2- Turkey, 3- Israel. Period.

Lmao. Iran shouldn't even be in the list. Helping some proxy covert means nothing. You are sidelined in Syria by Russia.

No presence in Lebanon. Just in Iraq and even they are not with you 100% since they targetted Solemni and actully Iraq is under US and Turkish invasion.. You are in only broken or invaded countries by other forces? Like Yemen.

Humiliating? It was a tactical retreat otherwise it would have given way to bigger wars and to this day I don't understand how the truth has been lost in all of this. Lmao!

Look Israel can be fixed when what behind it can't prevent it's fall in themselves and that is not far away. Israel is the least of concern right now.

You have no power or say in the region. Both militarily, diplomacy and political power. You are surrounded. Don't think of Saudi Arabia as one country but think about what lays behind it. Iran is a tiny mosquito in comparison.

What do these countries that Iran is claiming to be present have in common?

Iraq: Invaded by the US and Turkey
Syria: Invaded by US, Turkey and Russia
Yemen: Invaded by UAE and Saudi Arabia

Your presence seems to be thriving under invasion? Can that even be explained as an influence?
 
Last edited:
.
LOL. Dude, Israel crushed Arabs in 6 days in such a humiliating way that still after decades haunts Arabs. It was a decisive victory for Israel and you're taking pride in the 6 day war? Like wtf? Seriously?

Tiny or not, Israel is the representative of the US interests in the region. As long as the United States is a super power, Israel will remain an important player in the region. Not because it has any power on her own, but because it has the unconditional support of the United States.

Well, apparently your Saudi friends disagree with you because they decided to start negotiations with Iran in Iraq, a country that is widely under the Iranian influence at the moment. And Iran is currently present in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and the Gaza strip while Saudis have failed to secure even the poorest country in the region after 5 years of war. Not to mention that our ties with Qatar is so strong that Qatar literally said no to you even when you threatened to severe your ties with her.

The region has 3 important players at the moment: 1- Iran, 2- Turkey, 3- Israel. Period.
True. Arabs are Off the Scene thankfuly with their reatrded bacward monarchies. No one cares about them anymore to an extent that they had to offer their Nawamis to Israelis, only to keep themselves present in the future of the region. Hiding behind Israel at same time licking their backside Hahah.
"War with Iran is immenent." lmao, Even with Trump in power they couldn't Manage to get rid of Houthis, they are Drawing lines for Iran. Hilarious to say the least. Leave that faggot in his fantasies. The only Arabs that hold weight in the region are Iranian allies/friends. Others such as Jordanian monarchy, Sauds, Emirati shieks are already busy with stabbing one an other.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom