Dalit
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 23,669
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, you guys have only insults and offer no specific criticisms to back up your opinions. So if it wasn't for @FaujHistorian her analysis would stand unchallenged.
And even FH's criticisms don't counter Fair's main points, imo: That the generals call the shots doesn't detract from her analysis and that JuD has little public support is irrelevant in a Pakistan where decision-making is like an iceberg: democracy is the visible part but nine-tenths of the process is under water and invisible. (Though I count the parliamentary debate as progress, I still consider it subordinate to the generals.)
Do you hear the chicken called hafiz saeed come home to roost ?
This is why Saudis fund extremism in Pakistan.
i saw 'C. Christine Fair' and stopped! time saved
I wouldn't go quite that far. Rather, she's forceful, even rude, and that could possibly blind her to some useful inputs. That only means her analyses would be incomplete, not fanciful.
Because if the generals are calling the shots then representative democracy is merely a farce.It is a military matter indeed. And thus generals have to call the shots. Why the heck not.
Sunshine is a disinfectant; burial kills the body politic.So I am saddened when good people like you delve in the mess of 1970s and dig up dirt against our generals.
Because if the generals are calling the shots then representative democracy is merely a farce.
Sunshine is a disinfectant; burial kills the body politic.
Uniquely among the Allied leaders, both Chamberlain and Churchill were subject to dismissal at any time if they failed a vote of confidence in Parliament.In war time, would you be Churchill or a chamberlain. ?
Uniquely among the Allied leaders, both Chamberlain and Churchill were subject to dismissal at any time if they failed a vote of confidence in Parliament.
That's pretty obvious, isn't it? I'd choose to be an MP, second-guessing my leaders and holding them to account.Which would you rather be?
That's pretty obvious, isn't it? I'd choose to be an MP, second-guessing my leaders and holding them to account.
Look solomon bhai jaan
I have known Ms. Fair for a long time.
She started out as a pro-Pakistani thinker and writer. We both communicated via email. And she had a balanced view.
Then for some reason, she felt she is not getting anywhere in the Washington circles. 2 terms of Obama have indeed resulted in a much worse love hate relation betweeen Pakistan and USA.
Ms. Fair like any sensible thinker tanker in DC, adjusted her stance, and slowly changed to where she is now.
Do I say she is a bad person?
No. Not at all.
She is a columnist, writer, and a thinker tanker (my terms). In her current frame of mind, she is in a la la land.
I hope she comes out of it after elections in the US. But she may not. Who knows.
Please read my detailed response earlier in terms of "who holds sway on public opinion in Pak and you will understand".
Thank you.
Do you have links to any of her earlier works/articles before she went on her anti-pakistan rampage? Thanks in advance.