What's new

Where China Leads, India Follows?

arp2041

BANNED
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
10,406
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
India
India-Space-400x287.jpg


China this past week affirmed its status as one of the world’s three leading space powers by sending three astronauts, including its first woman astronaut, into space. On June 16, the powerful CZ-2F rocket lifted the Shenzhou 9 spacecraft, carrying the astronauts; on June 18, the Shenzhou docked with the Tiangong lab module, where the astronauts will stay for several days. This was another milestone for China’s ambitious space program, creating fresh pride in the country.

Should India emulate China to become the world’s fourth country with such capabilities? This depends on whether India can actually develop such capabilities, at what cost, and for what benefit.

India’s space program has advanced incrementally over the past four decades. In the 1970s and 1980s, it built small satellites and light rockets, and since the mid-1990s, it has built heavier satellites and more powerful rockets. India thus has one of the world’s few space programs capable of launching satellites along with countries including the U. S., Russia, China and Japan. Its annual space expenditures of around $1.5 billion are far lower than the $3 billion to $5 billion each for Russia, China, Japan, and Europe, and several billions for the United States. Also, India conducts fewer launches than its space peers – in the past two years (2010 and 2011), it conducted six launches, comparable with Japan’s five, but less than Europe’s 11, China’s 34, the United States’ 31 and Russia’s 66.

Three of these countries have sent men into space – the United States and Russia began their manned space programs in the late 1960s, and China has done so in the past decade.

China began with four unmanned missions from 1999 to 2002, when the CZ-2F rocket carried the 7.8 ton Shenzhou spacecraft to low earth orbit (LEO). China then sent astronauts aboard the fifth (2003), sixth (2005), and seventh (2008) Shenzhous, which orbited the earth for three to four days. In September 2011, China launched the 8-ton Tiangong lab module, which will stay in space for a few years, and can support three-person crews for about ten days. In November 2011, China launched an unmanned Shenzhou to successfully test its docking with the Tiangong. The end result: on June 18, the ninth Shenzhou carrying three astronauts docked with the Tiangong.

The Tiangong is the stepping stone to a space station. By around 2020, China plans to build a 60-ton station, based on several Tiangong-like modules, which can support crews for many months. China thereby aims to emulate the International Space Station, which was developed primarily by the United States and Russia, with additional contributions from Europe, Japan, and Canada, although the Chinese station will be much smaller than the 440-ton international station.

In purely technological terms, India could acquire capabilities similar to China’s, but it will take 15 to 20 years.

First, India will have to build a launcher to lift a spacecraft to LEO. Its reliable Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV), which has had more than a dozen successful flights, cannot lift a large payload. But the more powerful though unreliable Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV), which has failed in four of its seven flights, can lift a 5-ton spacecraft to LEO. The GSLV’s successor, the GSLV-Mk 3, which is expected to first fly in early 2013, can carry an 8-ton Shenzhou-like payload to LEO. By 2020-2025, if they prove their reliability after many consecutive successful flights, these rockets would be available for launching spacecraft.

Second, India will have to build the required spacecraft to ferry astronauts. In 2007, its 0.6 ton space recovery experiment tested the heat-shields needed for spacecraft re-entry to earth. India’s space agency has also conceptualized a 3 ton spacecraft that supports two astronauts for two-day space missions. Within a few years, India can build such a spacecraft, followed by a more capable 5 to 8 ton spacecraft. After three to four unmanned flights to test the technology, these spacecrafts can be available for manned missions.

China reportedly spent $2.5 billion for the first five Shenzhou flights. It will be just as, or even more, expensive for India. In 2007, India’s space agency projected that the first steps to manned space flight – involving launchers, spacecraft, and an astronaut-training facility – will cost $2 billion over eight years; more substantial capabilities would cost $5 billion over several years. India’s $1.5 billion space budget, even if it grows at 10 percent to 15 percent each year, can’t support such expenditures. Consequently, India can only follow China’s manned space trajectory if it considerably increases its space budget – an outlay that can come only at the expense of other developmental priorities.

Another option is for India to reduce expenditures on its existing space activities and divert some of its space budget toward a manned program. However, this would reduce the scope of important current projects—India’s satellites have many economic developmental applications and also have military-strategic applications.

Manned space programs have no real economic or military applications. They mainly have scientific applications, because some useful scientific research is conducted in space (most significantly, on the International Space Station). The technologies used in a manned space program may also have industrial spinoffs. Still, the magnitude of these benefits is modest.

In the end, it would only be prudent for India to follow in China’s space footsteps if it can develop the required technologies, keep costs low and promise significant benefits. Since costs will be high and the benefits remain unclear, an alternative option for India is to partner with the United States, Russia and other states, and draw upon their proven heavy launchers, spacecrafts, and space labs. Thus, Indian astronauts could fly on U.S. and Russian spacecraft, and Indian spacecraft could be lifted by international launchers, while India simultaneously develops its own manned space program. For its space partners, India can bring cost-sharing and future co-production possibilities to the table.

In short, piggy-backing to space may be better for India than taking the slow, indigenous route to a manned space program.

Where China Leads, India Follows? | China Power
 
.
Why so? Why not Russia leads and China follows :P Nobody is following Chinas foot steps , we are going independently . Although we beat them in BMD , you cant say India leads and China follows .
 
.
I have always said , The Western media tends to play up this India-China so called rivalry way too much . They just try to make stories out of every thing India and China does and try to find some Chinese/ Indian/ Western angle in them , even when there is none.
 
. . . . . .
Jealousy brew loser!

Those western report are insulting Chinese space program by trying to group us with India.

US, RUSSIA and CHINA belong to same group!

India shall join South Korea and Japan.

What is jealousy about following cheats

China got two true friend....NK & PK.....how can we follow china...
 
.
2 decades is a big leap, we all know China has head start...but that doesn't mean India is a sitting duck. Both countries have send probe orbiting moon, China is ahead in launching heavier satellite, their own space station and manned mission but that's according to their need and priority, India has its own....Doing what other countries did 4 decades ago isn't a good strategy if it doesn't server future purpose.

P.S. Also compare budget of CNSA and ISRO...
 
. .
To me India should not spend too much money in this kind of manned mission.India should be happy with its sat. launching capability and anti sat missile.Spend this extra money to Build Infrastructre.Thats priority.Spend to civilian nuke technology.Please no manned space mission.
 
. .
Article says india is 20 years behind and this makes indians feel so inferior!

i guess since you believe "western" articles , i could quote a lot of "western" articles for you which you would be denying vehemently since they are "western". or it may be that you believe what suits you (on lines of national policy of china)

guess you would believe it or MAY BE NOT

News Headlines

HONG KONG - As the Chinese economy continues to sputter, prominent corporate executives in China and Western economists say there is evidence that local and provincial officials are falsifying economic statistics to disguise the true depth of the troubles.


Jin Mao Tower and the Shanghai World Financial Center, in Shanghai.
Record-setting mountains of excess coal have accumulated at the country’s biggest storage areas because power plants are burning less coal in the face of tumbling electricity demand. But local and provincial government officials have forced plant managers not to report to Beijing the full extent of the slowdown, power sector executives said.

Electricity production and consumption have been considered a telltale sign of a wide variety of economic activity. They are widely viewed by foreign investors and even some Chinese officials as the gold standard for measuring what is really happening in the country’s economy, because the gathering and reporting of data in China is not considered as reliable as it is in many countries.

Indeed, officials in some cities and provinces are also overstating economic output, corporate revenue, corporate profits and tax receipts, the corporate executives and economists said. The officials do so by urging businesses to keep separate sets of books, showing improving business results and tax payments that do not exist.

The executives and economists roughly estimated that the effect of the inaccurate statistics was to falsely inflate a variety of economic indicators by 1 or 2 percentage points. That may be enough to make very bad economic news look merely bad. The executives and economists requested anonymity for fear of jeopardizing their relationship with the Chinese authorities, on whom they depend for data and business deals.


RELATED LINKS
Ignore China Data: Jim RogersWhy Dr. Copper Is Wrong About China’s EconomyEternal Commodity Bulls Have ‘Thrown in Towel’: Marc Faber
The National Bureau of Statistics, the government agency in Beijing that compiles most of the country’s economic statistics, denied that economic data had been overstated. “This is not rooted in evidence,” an agency spokeswoman said.

Some still express confidence in the official statistics. Mark Mobius, the executive chairman of Templeton Emerging Markets Group, cited the reported electricity figures when he expressed skepticism that the Chinese economy had real difficulties. “I don’t think the economic activity is that bad — just look at the electricity production,” he said.

But an economist with ties to the agency said that officials had begun making inquiries after detecting signs that electricity numbers may have been overstated.

Questions about the quality and accuracy of Chinese economic data are longstanding, but the concerns now being raised are unusual. This year is the first time since 1989 that a sharp economic slowdown has coincided with the once-a-decade changeover in the country’s top leadership.

Officials at all levels of government are under pressure to report good economic results to Beijing as they wait for promotions, demotions and transfers to cascade down from Beijing. So narrower and seemingly more obscure measures of economic activity are being falsified, according to the executives and economists.

“The government officials don’t want to see the negative,” so they tell power managers to report usage declines as zero change, said a chief executive in the power sector.


--------------------------

AND I JUST MADE A UNBELIEVER OUT OF TRUE BELIEVER
 
.
2 decades is a big leap, we all know China has head start...but that doesn't mean India is a sitting duck. Both countries have send probe orbiting moon, China is ahead in launching heavier satellite, their own space station and manned mission but that's according to their need and priority, India has its own....Doing what other countries did 4 decades ago isn't a good strategy if it doesn't server future purpose.

P.S. Also compare budget of CNSA and ISRO...


We all know China's space program has purposes and pride is the least of them.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom