When a average Pakistani can live with homosexuality, gender equality, religious freedom, sexual freedom then Pakistan will have arrived at the 1st world station
I'd say that's the wrong way of looking at it. If you define 'first world' as Western Liberal, then true. But a country can be socially conservative, preserve its morals and culture, and still be well developed.
The problem is not that we are too conservative or too religious. It's that we don't actually follow our ethics, and don't have an accountable political system, or any other proper civil institution.
Islamic ethics already teach religious tolerance. Most Pakistanis just don't actually practice Islamic ethics. You think we'd have this much widespread bribery and corruption if they were practiced?
As for 'sexual freedom', these are artificial ideas that have only recently been gaining ground in the West.
They were 'first world countries' long before they abandoned religion and embraced this form of Liberalism.
In fact,
they were very well developed and industrialized before they got Democracy. Britain, for example, only introduced Democracy as we know it in the late 1800s, and even then the aristocracy had considerable influence.
By the early 20th Century, Britain had workers' rights, a functioning police force, a relatively decent Civil Service system, and a strong and stable Judiciary.
This had absolutely nothing to do with accepting 'sexual freedom' or abandoning religion, which first gained ground in the 1970s.
Now, I'm not advocating a Theocracy, but Western Culture can not simply be imported and imposed upon the population of Pakistan. Besides, there are many flaws in the Western system anyways, even technical and institutional flaws that have nothing to do with liberalism or culture (such as the First Past the Post voting system and the Electoral College in America)
We need a system that suits us, and it will take time to develop. Cultures must evolve and develop on their own. Simply copying a different culture doesn't work.
