Minho
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2019
- Messages
- 601
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
The majority of modern day India certainly wasn't ruled for 1000 years or anywhere close. Only modern Pakistan was.Muslims ruled india for almost a thousand years, the very fact that your majority has not been changed, shows u been ruled by just rullers. Or else we could have forcefully converted the whole india and by now hinduism wouldve been a tale.
In iran, the safavid empire in 300 years converted sunni majority iran into shia majority iran, so dont think it was difficult for muslim rulers of India.
And there is a clear correlation between areas most directly ruled by muslims and muslim population. For example, UP and Bihar were ruled by Muslim empires for almost 500 years, and they have the most Muslims. Whereas places like Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Himachal, adn the Northeast were almost never ruled by Muslim Empires, and they have almost nonexistant Muslim populations.
British rule was actually a blessing for Pakistan, becasue if they never arrived Pakistan would have been ruled by Marathas and Sikhs, like India had been for several centuries before British arrived.Says the moron whose country does puja of trump. Not metaphorically but literally
No muslim ruler ever tried forceful converaion because it is against the religion, infact they worked for peaceful coexistence, like akbar. If the muslims wanted, no one could have stopped them, least not the "oppresses" hindus who never in a thousand years could challenge muslims. British rule was blessing in disguise for u guys.