Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
What I propose? I am not proposing anything , just stating facts and circumsential evidences which go against this myth created around the unfeated, darling of west , the mighty Alexander. Every dog has its days. He had it. World needs to move on and except the realities. Those who heads are burried deep in their white masters behind, cannot, will not be able to think rationally as the coconut inside wont let them. Slaves minds are worst form of slavery
You haven't cited a single fact. Isn't that surprising?
Unwritten history?? The history that was written about this battle got more holes in it then swizz cheese. I dont have to keep on repeating myself here.
Perhaps, but that doesn't give you liberty to manufacture your own version without the support of something. You have nothing.
You can be a janitor, polishing Earl Gray shoes , you can be the Queen of England. Do you see me give a f***???
No. That is clear, that facts do not bother you, only your own opinion does.
So why did he stop? More of the case, being made to stop.
I thought with your mastery of the case and the circumstances, if not the facts, it would have come to your attention that the soldiers didn't want to go on.
Seems you are a "phoopa" of Alexander. But as history goes, he has to be worst foreign invader of sub continent. The Nomad Babur created his own legacy and dynasty in the region, and he was nobody when compared to the Alexender, "the great".
So it's the religion that determines whether or not X, Y or Z is militarily competent. I am glad you acknowledged it.
If you can get your head out of your behind, maybe it will all start to make sense. In sha Allah.
Apart from vulgarity and abuse, we are still waiting for a single fact, for a single source.
beaten? lethargic? tired? heavy toll? mutiny? leadership losing control?
They refused to follow him east. You are free to use any words you want; how does that affect the situation?
Think loud mouth think.
I have some late-breaking news for you.
Scientists have discovered that you do not need your mouth to think. So now you can stop 'thinking' and try using your brains instead. LOL.
Its implies EXACTLY what I said. He knew what lies ahead. In military terms he had the INTELLIGENCE, to be precise HUMINT, of the challenges that he might have to face if he move forward. You are honking rubbish, as usual.
For him to be completely oblivious of what lies south is out of question, considering that the midget actually died of the wounds received in the battle of Multan, all subsequent actions and path taken are of the defeated army.
Ah, yes, of course, a defeated army picks a new and untested, unsecured route for its retreat. Have you taught military theory to your officers already, or are you getting into shape for that assignment?
You said his troops didnt want to move ahead, then why not take the safe passage back to Bactria???
Because they said they would follow him in all else, and for three reasons, heading south seemed like a good idea:
- Porus had persuaded him to secure his adjacent kingdom, ruled over by his own nephew;
- A march over the plains seems preferable to anybody, and should have been obvious even to you, than a march over high mountains;
- The territories abutted those under Achaemenid rule, and it added 'strategic depth' to the Alexandrian border to annex them.
You dont accept the existence of Noah and Adam, mentioned extensively in the written history, from all over the world, different accounts, different races, ethinicities, and here you are pathetically defending a clearly BIASED and hogwash of history written by non other then greeks themselves, defending them shamelessly and rather unsuccessfully.
No, I don't. There is no historical evidence for them, other than mentions in the Old Testament.
Have some mercy on yourself.
But you haven't stopped.