What's new

When China Rules the World

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tiger,
There is no comparison between bharat and China, its like comparing Bill Gates with someone from Mumbai Slums,
According to CIA world fact book, the Current account balance of India is -10,360,000,000 (minus) while China is the wealthiest country in the world with $ 249,900,000,000 (Plus). India is listed as 152 and China as no.1
Bharat suffers from higher rates of malnutrition than Sub-Saharan Africa. Over 70% of its population is either illiterate or educated below the primary level. Indian tourist industry is 1/6 of Las Vegas

India currently accounts for 1.5% of World trade as of 2007. Bharat’s trade imbalance with the US for 2010 is -7,980.5 million or around 8 billion USD.

it is indeed amusing how many pakistanis take pride in the chinese accomplishment and consider it as their own. guys like these think about stuff like that when they spend some alone time with their hand.

but hey, whatever makes u happy big guy!
 
.
it is indeed amusing how many pakistanis take pride in the chinese accomplishment and consider it as their own. guys like these think about stuff like that when they spend some alone time with their hand.

but hey, whatever makes u happy big guy!

I am glad that our Pakistani allies are happy for us. :cheers:

guys like these think about stuff like that when they spend some alone time with their hand.

What is wrong with you Shinigami, lol...
 
.
Written during the height of Dubya's lunacy, when the world grew disillusioned of the US-led West.

The US is the leader and the backbone of the West, and other Western nations simply can't abandon US since they are in the same boat.

This domino effect cannot be neglected.
 
.
Tiger,
There is no comparison between bharat and China, its like comparing Bill Gates with someone from Mumbai Slums,
According to CIA world fact book, the Current account balance of India is -10,360,000,000 (minus) while China is the wealthiest country in the world with $ 249,900,000,000 (Plus). India is listed as 152 and China as no.1
Bharat suffers from higher rates of malnutrition than Sub-Saharan Africa. Over 70% of its population is either illiterate or educated below the primary level. Indian tourist industry is 1/6 of Las Vegas

India currently accounts for 1.5% of World trade as of 2007. Bharat’s trade imbalance with the US for 2010 is -7,980.5 million or around 8 billion USD.

India's literacy rate was 65% in 2001 and the youth literacy rate was 82 % . Today it must be much higher . the survey of 2011 will reveal the new figures.

Sorry but your post can not be taken seriously as you have been proven wrong .
 
.
I think that the title is a bit misleading. Chinese members have repeatedly said that China is not going to follow the American way and instead focus on strengthening ties and improving relations. The main reason for anti-US sentiments is the American policy of looking down on others and bullying smaller nations.

But it is also true that India has an extraordinarily large public debt and we also need to remember that they have business titans (or tycoons, call them what you will) as well.
 
.
iF CHINA DOES RULE THE WORLD?

then it will be a advantage being Asian.

Plus the Chinese were extremenly ahead in the years 900-1400 they were the Super-Power of that era. There was a chance in history that China could have infact taken over the World, but they screwed up or choosed not too (such a shame).

All i know if the West as had it's time and it hasn't done right in this World with it's power. It has invaded countires, destroyed lives of many and the goverment don't listen to the voice of its people who want peace.

Will China be any better? only time can tell but it has to be better than this. If not well i still believe Asia will rise and that counts for something :D

:china:
 
.
The title of the thread reminds me of the Kashmiri sentence:

Tehle pe kharoon sheen!
 
.
iF CHINA DOES RULE THE WORLD?

then it will be a advantage being Asian.

Plus the Chinese were extremenly ahead in the years 900-1400 they were the Super-Power of that era. There was a chance in history that China could have infact taken over the World, but they screwed up or choosed not too (such a shame).

All i know if the West as had it's time and it hasn't done right in this World with it's power. It has invaded countires, destroyed lives of many and the goverment don't listen to the voice of its people who want peace.

Will China be any better? only time can tell but it has to be better than this. If not well i still believe Asia will rise and that counts for something :D

:china:

China believes the equality, not the racial superiority like the West. :D
 
.
What happened to the Li, Yues, Wu and others?

Of course, no racial superiority!
 
.
Great contradiction's,though I am averse to it now,one Chinese warrior directly brought comparison's between India and China even though they claim they r not obsessed with India and do care little about it.

One Pakistani rushed up with forged figures(especially literacy rate)to hide his nation's incompetency though latter blaming the miscommunication as apart of comprehension problem of Indians.
 
.
What happened to the Li, Yues, Wu and others?

Of course, no racial superiority!

Do you mean the hundred Yue tribes?

These people were also descended from the ancient Sinic tribe. Later they got subjugated by the more powerful kingdom, just like in the ancient Hellenic period. This was vastly different from how the white men looted the North America.
 
.
Of course.

How true.

Don't want to get into it again, but here is of one set of Chinese people who were assimilated and just to indicate racialism.

The country of Wu is in many respects even more interesting ethnologically than that of Ts’u. When, a generation or two before the then vassal Chou family conquered China, two of the sons of the ruler of that vassal principality decided to forego their rights of succession, they settled amongst the Jungle savages, cut their hair, adopted the local raiment, and tattooed their bodies; or, rather, it is said the elder of the two covered his head and his body decently, while the younger cut his hair, went naked, and tattooed his body. The words “Jungle savages” apply to the country later called Ts’u; but as Wu, when we first hear of her, was a subordinate country belonging to Ts’u; and as in any case the word “Wu” was unknown to orthodox China, not to say to extreme western China, in 1200 B.C. when the adventurous brothers migrated; this particular point need not trouble us so much as it seems to have puzzled the Chinese critics. About 575 the first really historical King of Wu paid visits to the Emperor’s court, to the court of his suzerain the King of Ts’u, and to the court of Lu: probably the Hwai system of rivers would carry him within measurable distance of all three, for the headwaters almost touch the tributaries of the Han, and the then Ts’u capital (modern King-thou Fu) was in touch with the River Han. He observed when in Lu: “We only know how to knot our hair in Wu; what could we do with such fine clothes as you wear?” It was the policy of Tsin and of the other minor federal princes to make use of Wu as a diversion against the advance of Ts’u: it is evident that by this time Ts’u had begun to count seriously as a Chinese federal state, for one of the powerful private families behind the throne and against the throne in Lu expressed horror that “southern savages (i.e. Wu) should invade China (i.e. Ts’u),” by taking from it part of modern An Hwei province: as, however, barbarian Ts’u had taken it first from orthodox China, perhaps the mesne element of Ts’u was not in the statesman’s mind at all, but only the original element,–China. An important remark is made by one of the old historians to the effect that the language and manners of Wu were the same as those of Yiieh. In 483, when Wu’s pretensions as Protector were at their greatest, the people of Ts’i made use of ropes eight feet long in order to bind certain Wu prisoners they had taken, “because their heads were cropped so close”: this statement hardly agrees with that concerning “knotted hair,” unless the toupet or chignon was very short indeed. ’There are not many native Wu words quoted, beyond the bare name of the country itself, which is something like Keu-gu, or Kou-gu: an executioner’s knife is mentioned under the foreign name chuh-lu, presented to persons expected to commit suicide, after the Japanese harakiri fashion. In 584 B.C., when the first steps were taken by orthodox China to utilize Wu politically, it was found necessary, as we have seen, to teach the Wu folk the use of war-chariots and bows and arrows: this important statement points distinctly to the previous utter isolation of Wu from the pale of Chinese civilization. In the year 502 Ts’i sent a princess as hostage to Wu, and ended by giving her in marriage to the Wu heir: (we have seen how Tsin anticipated Ts’i by twenty-five years in conferring a similar honour upon Ts’u). A century or more later, when Mencius was advising the bellicose court of Ts’i, he alluded with indignation to this “barbarous” act. In 544 the Wu prince Ki-chah had visited Lu and other orthodox states.

Ancient China Simplified - Chapter XXVIII - Barbarians (by Edward Harper Parker)
 
.
Of course.

How true.

Don't want to get into it again, but here is of one set of Chinese people who were assimilated and just to indicate racialism.

The country of Wu is in many respects even more interesting ethnologically than that of Ts’u. When, a generation or two before the then vassal Chou family conquered China, two of the sons of the ruler of that vassal principality decided to forego their rights of succession, they settled amongst the Jungle savages, cut their hair, adopted the local raiment, and tattooed their bodies; or, rather, it is said the elder of the two covered his head and his body decently, while the younger cut his hair, went naked, and tattooed his body. The words “Jungle savages” apply to the country later called Ts’u; but as Wu, when we first hear of her, was a subordinate country belonging to Ts’u; and as in any case the word “Wu” was unknown to orthodox China, not to say to extreme western China, in 1200 B.C. when the adventurous brothers migrated; this particular point need not trouble us so much as it seems to have puzzled the Chinese critics. About 575 the first really historical King of Wu paid visits to the Emperor’s court, to the court of his suzerain the King of Ts’u, and to the court of Lu: probably the Hwai system of rivers would carry him within measurable distance of all three, for the headwaters almost touch the tributaries of the Han, and the then Ts’u capital (modern King-thou Fu) was in touch with the River Han. He observed when in Lu: “We only know how to knot our hair in Wu; what could we do with such fine clothes as you wear?” It was the policy of Tsin and of the other minor federal princes to make use of Wu as a diversion against the advance of Ts’u: it is evident that by this time Ts’u had begun to count seriously as a Chinese federal state, for one of the powerful private families behind the throne and against the throne in Lu expressed horror that “southern savages (i.e. Wu) should invade China (i.e. Ts’u),” by taking from it part of modern An Hwei province: as, however, barbarian Ts’u had taken it first from orthodox China, perhaps the mesne element of Ts’u was not in the statesman’s mind at all, but only the original element,–China. An important remark is made by one of the old historians to the effect that the language and manners of Wu were the same as those of Yiieh. In 483, when Wu’s pretensions as Protector were at their greatest, the people of Ts’i made use of ropes eight feet long in order to bind certain Wu prisoners they had taken, “because their heads were cropped so close”: this statement hardly agrees with that concerning “knotted hair,” unless the toupet or chignon was very short indeed. ’There are not many native Wu words quoted, beyond the bare name of the country itself, which is something like Keu-gu, or Kou-gu: an executioner’s knife is mentioned under the foreign name chuh-lu, presented to persons expected to commit suicide, after the Japanese harakiri fashion. In 584 B.C., when the first steps were taken by orthodox China to utilize Wu politically, it was found necessary, as we have seen, to teach the Wu folk the use of war-chariots and bows and arrows: this important statement points distinctly to the previous utter isolation of Wu from the pale of Chinese civilization. In the year 502 Ts’i sent a princess as hostage to Wu, and ended by giving her in marriage to the Wu heir: (we have seen how Tsin anticipated Ts’i by twenty-five years in conferring a similar honour upon Ts’u). A century or more later, when Mencius was advising the bellicose court of Ts’i, he alluded with indignation to this “barbarous” act. In 544 the Wu prince Ki-chah had visited Lu and other orthodox states.

Ancient China Simplified - Chapter XXVIII - Barbarians (by Edward Harper Parker)

This white man who wrote this kind of gibberish known nothing about the Chinese history.
 
.
How true.

And so whatever Chinese write here is gibberish too?

Anyway, it is Han racialism is well established a fact.

That said, one finds it amusing that the Chinese feel that they alone know everything about everything and everyone else has no clue.

Another sign of arrogant racialism!

Enough said, return to your dreams.
 
.
LOL is that troll Ray still here?

And this is a mod on the Indian defence forum.

Different standards I guess.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom