When an Indian historian lashed out at the west.

[DESERT FIGHTER]

What has Greece or Germany done to India? Dude stop to insult people because east and west. For Japan, China is west

Nobodys talking bout greece. If anything greece itself is a third rate state that only benefits from EU. A collection of former colonial powers.
Talk about EU.. talk about tiny netherlands and its rape of congo.
Talk bout Italy and its colonies.
Talk about France and it brutal genocides and exploitation that continues till date.
Talk about UK which didnt even spare ancient sites here in Pakistan going as far as to stealing 5000 old bricks to IVC sites to fuking build railways to siphon off treaures.

Talk about america which industrialised slavery through its slave ships.

China is not the enemy? According to who?

Every neighbour of india is its enemy.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

What has Greece or Germany done to India? Dude stop to insult people because east and west. For Japan, China is west

Yes, it is really aggravating to see Asia doing the usual blanket blaming of "the West" instead of just naming names. Maybe we should try this tactic too.

 

[Apollon]

Nobodys talking bout greece. If anything greece itself is a third rate state that only benefits from EU. A collection of former colonial powers.
Talk about EU.. talk about tiny netherlands and its rape of congo.
Talk bout Italy and its colonies.
Talk about France and it brutal genocides and exploitation that continues till date.
Talk about UK which didnt even spare ancient sites here in Pakistan going as far as to stealing 5000 old bricks to IVC sites to fuking build railways to siphon off treaures.

Talk about america which industrialised slavery through its slave ships.


Every neighbour of india is its enemy.

When did Netherlands rape congo. Go on and tell me.

And btw slavery was industrialized by arabic countries and their main scource of income.

You also dont mention ottoman empire and its colonies which it exploited in unimaginable brutality.

You seem to ignore hundreds of years attacks of libya against italian cities and hundredthousands of slaves captured there.

You appear a bit biased.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

When did Netherlands rape congo. Go on and tell me.

And btw slavery was industrialized by arabic countries and their main scource of income.

You also dont mention ottoman empire and its colonies which it exploited in unimaginable brutality.

You seem to ignore hundreds of years attacks of libya against italian cities and hundredthousands of slaves captured there.

You appear a bit biased.

Tru my bad I mixed colonies of fuking belgium with netherlands.

Netherland colonies:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.worldatlas.com/amp/articles/former-dutch-colonies.html&ved=2ahUKEwj6qNjWnd_1AhVcB2MBHcrYCloQFnoECAQQBQ&usg=AOvVaw1kGzT67OrFhs52iG_020K6

Uncle Leopolds Congo:

Ottomans werent exploitive in nature they didnt colonise their territory and they cant be compared with the "white mans burden". They were hacking off people fking hands for not collecting the days quota of rubber plant milk.

And the arab slave trade was a few thousand every year they bought from african kings. They were fucking sending ships to raid and capture slaves to run entire island plantations in the caribeans and than to their own countries. That can be seen today among the percentage of african arabs.
If not go research and study about the industrial slave trade across the atlantic.

Also are fuking kidding when you talk about libyans fighting the italians?

We understand the ottomans ruled you but why do you try to justify colonialiam? Have you no decency?

 

[Indus Pakistan]

This is pure BS revisionist Indian history based on fantasies, viewed through a modern prism.

There was no Indian nation before the British, India exists because of the British, otherwise it would still be a region with dozens of kingdoms or countries.

Just read up on the Maratha wars in Bengal, just a decade before the battle of Plassey in 1757, those wars resulted in the deaths and murder of 500,000, so no, India was not a peaceful abode, they were killing each other, and history is murky.

This rubbish is to reinforce a fantasy about a loss to a nation that never existed.

India has one of the most expansive railway networks in the world, built by the British.
It has a massive canal network, built by the British.
It has good educational infrastructure, of which they are proud, created by the British.
India still uses English as an official language, a British language.
India still benefits from the civil service structure created by the British. why not get rid of it and renew like it was in old kingdoms, before the British.
Indians are proud of their so-called democracy and sham secularism, both British ideas.
And, So many other points.

There's so much dichotomy in these silly childlike war cries, it's laughable. Pure hypocrisy.

China actually is a historical nation, it cannot be compared to India, which was always a region, never a nation.

India is no more a nation then the equator. Your post was 10/10

 

[peagle]

India is no more a nation then the equator. Your post was 10/10

Hey, nice to see you, welcome back.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

This man does not only speak for India but the entire global south!

I hope Indians will learn that the West are not their friends and China is not the enemy. Chinese and Indian working together will rock the western world.

But the same guy has no qualms about justifying Indian colonialism in Kashmir

https://www.reddit.com/r/Kashmiri/comments/s9w0s1

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

German colonial empire

But the same guy has no qualms about justifying Indian colonialism in Kashmir

https://www.reddit.com/r/Kashmiri/comments/s9w0s1

Yes ofcourse.. india is the bastard child of colonials and thinks it has the right to copy them.

Yes, it is really aggravating to see Asia doing the usual blanket blaming of "the West" instead of just naming names. Maybe we should try this tactic too.

Prolly has to do with this:

 

[Apollon]

Tru my bad I mixed colonies of fuking belgium with netherlands.

Netherland colonies:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.worldatlas.com/amp/articles/former-dutch-colonies.html&ved=2ahUKEwj6qNjWnd_1AhVcB2MBHcrYCloQFnoECAQQBQ&usg=AOvVaw1kGzT67OrFhs52iG_020K6

Uncle Leopolds Congo:
View attachment 812629

Ottomans werent exploitive in nature they didnt colonise their territory and they cant be compared with the "white mans burden". They were hacking off people fking hands for not collecting the days quota of rubber plant milk.

And the arab slave trade was a few thousand every year they bought from african kings. They were fucking sending ships to raid and capture slaves to run entire island plantations in the caribeans and than to their own countries. That can be seen today among the percentage of african arabs.
If not go research and study about the industrial slave trade across the atlantic.

Also are fuking kidding when you talk about libyans fighting the italians?
View attachment 812631
We understand the ottomans ruled you but why do you try to justify colonialiam? Have you no decency?

1st who you think captured the slaves in africa? Let me tell you a secret...africans and arabs. The Kingdom of Benin got rich by it.

The ottomans were brutal nazis, the worst barbaric opressors on same level as leopold of belgium. Constant massacres, mass slavery. They took entire years of children as slaves. Do you have no decency at all?

Maybe you go and research about ottoman crimes. The countless genocides they did.

Btw the arab slave trade was a few millions each year

Arab slave trade - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Ottoman Egypt alone recieved 8 times more slaves than were ever shipped over to america.

It was easier to live under Hitlers rule than to live under Ottiman terror rule. They came and took all sons of a specific age, they stole even little girls. They massacred, exploited and based their entire state on mass slavery. They committed countless genocides and you come here and talk rubbish like: uhhh but massacreing millions lf people was not so bad from the ottomans...

Go and ask the armenians how nice ottomans were to them.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

1st who you think captured the slaves in africa? Let me tell you a secret...africans and arabs. The Kingdom of Benin got rich by it.

The ottomans were brutal nazis, the worst barbaric opressors on same level as leopold of belgium. Constant massacres, mass slavery. They took entire years of children as slaves. Do you have no decency at all?

Maybe you go and research about ottoman crimes. The countless genocides they did.

Btw the arab slave trade was a few millions each year

Arab slave trade - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Ottoman Egypt alone recieved 8 times more slaves than were ever shipped over to america.

It was easier to live under Hitlers rule than to live under Ottiman terror rule. They came and took all sons of a specific age, they stole even little girls. They massacred, exploited and based their entire state on mass slavery. They committed countless genocides and you come here and talk rubbish like: uhhh but massacreing millions lf people was not so bad from the ottomans...

Go and ask the armenians how nice ottomans were to them.

From colonialism to ottomans..
Go join a turkish forum and plead their rule.
You have nothing to say here except moronically comparing colonialism to ottoman rule and justifying it with more stupidity.
Nazis killed dozens of millions.. ottomans should have done the same to you? Yet here you are with your stupidity.

 

[Apollon]

From colonialism to ottomans..
Go join a turkish forum and plead their rule.
You have nothing to say here except moronically comparing colonialism to ottoman rule and justifying it with more stupidity.

I have news for you, occupying and exploiting other nations is colonialism.

The entire balkan region and south eastern europe was victim of ottoman colonialism.

And i dont compare colonialism to ottoman rule. Ottoman rule was worse. Infact colonial powers at least brought infrastructure and build something. The ottomans acted like parasites and only took out. They gave not a single thing to Greece for example. The ottomans state paradigm was that of the cancer cell, exploit till collapse. They build nothing, created nothing of value. No industry, no railways, nothing of lasting effect.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

I have news for you, occupying and exploiting other nations is colonialism.

The entire balkan region and south eastern europe was victim of ottoman colonialism.

And i dont compare colonialism to ottoman rule. Ottoman rule was worse. Infact colonial powers at least brought infrastructure and build something. The ottomans acted like parasites and only took out. They gave not a single thing to Greece for example. The ottomans state paradigm was that of the cancer cell, exploit till collapse. They build nothing, created nothing of value. No industry, no railways, nothing of lasting effect.

I got another one for you, you tool. You cant justify european colonialism and genocides and exploitation that continues to this day with the Ottoman conquest of slavic europe.

Now piss off to a Turkish forum and bitch bout the Ottoman occupying greece.

We are discussing the colonisation of Africa and Asia.... not greek insecurities.

 

[Apollon]

I got another one for you, you tool. You cant justify european colonialism and genocides and exploitation that continues to this day with the Ottoman conquest of slavic europe.

Now piss off to a Turkish forum and bitch bout the Ottoman occupying greece.

We are discussing the colonisation of Africa and Asia.... not greek insecurities.

I dont bitch. Greece fought for its freedom and avenged itself. Or as a british diplomat said:

"The Turks of Greece left few traces. They disappeared suddenly and finally in the spring of 1821 unmourned and unnoticed by the rest of the world....It was hard to believe then that Greece once contained a large population of Turkish descent, living in small communities all over the country, prosperous farmers, merchants, and officials, whose families had known no other home for hundreds of years...They were killed deliberately, without qualm or scruple, and there was no regrets either then or later.[26]"

Because of that there is no insecurity.

We destroyed our colonizers and erased their entire legacy.

I think that creates a psychologica solution for such issues.

 

[zectech]

I have news for you, occupying and exploiting other nations is colonialism.

The entire balkan region and south eastern europe was victim of ottoman colonialism.

And i dont compare colonialism to ottoman rule. Ottoman rule was worse. Infact colonial powers at least brought infrastructure and build something. The ottomans acted like parasites and only took out. They gave not a single thing to Greece for example. The ottomans state paradigm was that of the cancer cell, exploit till collapse. They build nothing, created nothing of value. No industry, no railways, nothing of lasting effect.

That is not colonialism, that is what hippie leftists call colonialism. Colonies can either be good or ill. Birds have colonies, penguins have colonies, everybody in new land is a colonist. So a squirrel leaving for new pastures is a colonist.

Rape and torture and genocide is not colonialism, that is barbarism. Genocidal d**chebag*y retards hide themselves as colonist when these individuals are Hindutva rapists and genociders, such as the British.

Ottoman Empire was rules by barbarian Turks, so that is what these were - barbarians. There are two opposing sides in human history: civilized (the good) and barbarians (the evil).

Greeks defeated Trojan Barbarians. The Khosians and Pygmies were genocided by barbarian invaders over 2000 years ago.

Barbarians are the stuff of nightmares. Civilized people are of the salt of the earth.

 

[The Accountant]

This is pure BS revisionist Indian history based on fantasies, viewed through a modern prism.

There was no Indian nation before the British, India exists because of the British, otherwise it would still be a region with dozens of kingdoms or countries.

Just read up on the Maratha wars in Bengal, just a decade before the battle of Plassey in 1757, those wars resulted in the deaths and murder of 500,000, so no, India was not a peaceful abode, they were killing each other, and history is murky.

This rubbish is to reinforce a fantasy about a loss to a nation that never existed.

India has one of the most expansive railway networks in the world, built by the British.
It has a massive canal network, built by the British.
It has good educational infrastructure, of which they are proud, created by the British.
India still uses English as an official language, a British language.
India still benefits from the civil service structure created by the British. why not get rid of it and renew like it was in old kingdoms, before the British.
Indians are proud of their so-called democracy and sham secularism, both British ideas.
And, So many other points.

There's so much dichotomy in these silly childlike war cries, it's laughable. Pure hypocrisy.

China actually is a historical nation, it cannot be compared to India, which was always a region, never a nation.

Stop bull shitting. Ever heard of french civil war or wars between uk and france or civil war of america ?

Why go so long ago what is your opinion on world war 1 and 2 when millions were killed ?

Subcontinent was united by muslims under mughals not by britains ...

Britains invaded and looted subcontinent mughals and muslims convert it into home and nation ...