Whats going on in Mashhad?

[VEVAK]

I am sorry but to blame "outside forces" for lack of a responsive government is a cop-out. For sure IRI has been under immense pressure but so are many other countries. Even the US has to deal with "enemies" on a daily basis: narco-trafficking, rising China, nuclear N. Korea, diminishing economic power, etc (these are just as valid a threat as the ones faced by IRI). Did the US abandon it's democratic principals just because it was "fighting" a nuclear armed Soviet Union? When the US expanded the Vietnam war it was the American people's pressure that forced the government to pack-up and leave, defeated and demoralized. The US government did not blame the Soviets for the daily demonstrations in DC and other cities.

Clearly you don't even know much about your own history! AND YES U.S. did lose it's principals in the fight against communism.
When the U.S. was raiding communist party gatherings, seizing communist party assets, and imprisoning anyone who had anything to do with the communist party including actors, lawyers, businessmen.... where were your so called civil rights then? where was the Freedom of Speech, Freedom of assembly,... that should have been guaranteed to communist as well? OR DID THOSE CIVIL RIGHT END AS SOON AS THEY BECAME A CREDIBAL THREAT TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT?
Do you think the U.S. Media was allowed to give free voice and equal rights to the communist party? HELL NO!
Even till this day U.S. immigration on Citizenship and Legal Residence application ask bluntly if you are now or have you ever been a member of the communist party!!!
So I'm sorry to be the one to tell you but your so called Civil Rights END's as soon as they become a credible threat to the U.S. capitalist government and just because you are brainwashed to think you have certain freedoms it sure as hell doesn't mean you really have them!

U.S. Vietnam war lasted for 20 years! Your BS comments make it sound like the U.S. started a war and within a year the voice of the American people ended it. And that's NOTHIGN BUT A DELUSION!

20 years of war without a clear and decisive victory doesn't mean the American people ended that war and even if we assume that they did it took over a decade of protests and civil unrest to change a single declaration of war and it took decades of protests, civil unrest and violent killings by the government to end segregation in the U.S. and that does not seem very democratic to me at all!

Today you can't show me a single News outlet on Basic cable in the U.S. that shows the Israeli government for what it truly is which is an "Apartheid State" and that is NOT an opinion that is an absolute fact! Yet all major news outlets in the U.S. CNN, MSNBC, FOX.... all of them portray that government to the American People as some kind of Democracy as if well over half the population who happen to be Palestinians who live in the territory US calls Israel somehow don't even exist!

You like to claim you have freedom of press in the U.S. and yet the American people by the % are the fattest and most uninformed people on the planet and that's not meant to be an insult it's just a matter of fact!

 

[VEVAK]

You have not understood my post.
I have not said that majority of Iranians at moment oppose Wilayat-e-Faqih or government etc.
No, but I am only talking about the "basic principles" of Iranian people having the right to criticize the Islamic system and having the right to leave this system if their majority wish to do so.
But these "basic principles" are absent in present Iranian system. Neither they allow the Iranian people to criticize the Wilayat system, not it allow them to come to the government, nor allow them to change this system if their majority wish it.

All this make Iranian Islamic system nothing else than "Islamic Dictatorship", where Islamic State is not ready to give those rights to the minorities which Prophet Muhammad wanted to have for himself while living under the Kuffar of Mecca i.e. the right of freedom of Expression, where he could criticize the idols of the Kuffar, and to do Tableegh of his views and ideas even if they were against the majority views of Kuffar.


Do i really need to visit Iran in order to know what Freedom of Expression is?
Do I really need to visit Iran to know if Iranian Atheists, Bahais got the right to worship?
Do I really need to visit Iran to know how Islamic Government censors any criticism upon Wilayat system and seize the right of people to abandon it?

Please tell me where I am wrong when I am talking about these "basic principles" and basic human rights regarding present Iranian Islamic Government?

Nobody knows with certainty if majority of Iranians support the present Wilayat system, or want to change to the secular system.

Only thing that we know is this that in the past majority of Iranians voted for Islamic system. But after that the Government took away this right of voting from them regarding the system of the country.

I am demanding nothing more than the return of this right. If majority of Iranians still want Islamic system, then I have no problem with it. But if their majority want secularism, then are you going to support this right of the Iranian people to abandon the Islamic system?

Your not Iranian, you haven't even been to Iran & you don't speak Farsi and you keep on insisting to know what it is the vast majority of Iranians want! And that IS A DELUSION!

You either acknowledge that the vast majority of Iranians DO NOT want a revolution or you acknowledge that they do! You can't have it both way's!

Claiming that the vast majority of Iranians currently don't want a revolution but if they did wanted one in the future they wouldn't be able to get it is ABSURD!

AGAIN YOUR NOT Iranian! The worlds main Superpower hasn't been meddling in your country for 60 years & they didn't overthrow your countries 1st democracy for monarchy just to steal your Oil & sell overpriced weapons & the worlds main superpower isn't budgeting to overthrow your government for the past 3 decades & the worlds main superpower hasn't been broadcasting propaganda via TV and radio into your country for 3 decades for the express purpose of overthrowing your government and the world main superpower hasn't sponsored an 8 year war, terrorists, assassinations, organized civil unrest.... against your country for 3 decades for the express purpose of overthrowing your government for 3 decades!

SO YES YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE IRANIAN TO KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS THE VAST MAJORITY OF IRANIANS WANT!

And you have to be Iranian to understand that as long as U.S. hostilities towards Iran persists unregulated Freedom of press, freedom of assembly,.... will be used as a tool against the Iranian people because we can look at our own history and predict what the U.S. and capitalists like Rupert Murdock would do if Iran allowed for it's own media to be used against it based on historical predictive behavior

So yes in Iran people already have the right to protest but if you wanna protest you need to get a permit and you best believe that the Iranian government has the right to search your history and bank accounts.... to make sure your not being sponsored by foreign agents

And if you wanna open up a newspaper in Iran that's fine but you best believe that the Iranian government is going to make sure that your not being sponsored by foreigners

History has shown the so called Civil Rights Americans think they have ends as soon as the U.S. government concludes a certain freedom by a certain groups is turning into a credible threat and it is NO different in Iran

 

[yavar]

Iran report exposing BBC, Radio Farda, propaganda campaign شانتاژ دروغین رادیو فردا، بی بی سی

 

[veg]

Your not Iranian, you haven't even been to Iran & you don't speak Farsi and you keep on insisting to know what it is the vast majority of Iranians want! And that IS A DELUSION!

You either acknowledge that the vast majority of Iranians DO NOT want a revolution or you acknowledge that they do! You can't have it both way's!

Claiming that the vast majority of Iranians currently don't want a revolution but if they did wanted one in the future they wouldn't be able to get it is ABSURD!

AGAIN YOUR NOT Iranian! The worlds main Superpower hasn't been meddling in your country for 60 years & they didn't overthrow your countries 1st democracy for monarchy just to steal your Oil & sell overpriced weapons & the worlds main superpower isn't budgeting to overthrow your government for the past 3 decades & the worlds main superpower hasn't been broadcasting propaganda via TV and radio into your country for 3 decades for the express purpose of overthrowing your government and the world main superpower hasn't sponsored an 8 year war, terrorists, assassinations, organized civil unrest.... against your country for 3 decades for the express purpose of overthrowing your government for 3 decades!

SO YES YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE IRANIAN TO KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS THE VAST MAJORITY OF IRANIANS WANT!

And you have to be Iranian to understand that as long as U.S. hostilities towards Iran persists unregulated Freedom of press, freedom of assembly,.... will be used as a tool against the Iranian people because we can look at our own history and predict what the U.S. and capitalists like Rupert Murdock would do if Iran allowed for it's own media to be used against it based on historical predictive behavior

So yes in Iran people already have the right to protest but if you wanna protest you need to get a permit and you best believe that the Iranian government has the right to search your history and bank accounts.... to make sure your not being sponsored by foreign agents

And if you wanna open up a newspaper in Iran that's fine but you best believe that the Iranian government is going to make sure that your not being sponsored by foreigners

History has shown the so called Civil Rights Americans think they have ends as soon as the U.S. government concludes a certain freedom by a certain groups is turning into a credible threat and it is NO different in Iran

You did not reply to my post about Islam's killing of all Kuffar, or their becoming Muslim under the compulsion of sword.

And why Iranian Islamic Wali Faqih not acting upon Islamic Sharia and killing all Bahaies and Shias and Hindus and Buddhists....?

Do you really believe in such a religion?

Do you really believe that usurping the rights of Atheists, Bahaies and all Non Muslims to do Tableegh of their views is JUSTICE and HUMANITY?

Why can't you give Non Muslims the same rights which prophet Muhammad demanded for himself while living under the Kuffar of Mecca?

Actually you are far worst than the Kuffar of Mecca in this regards. They didn't kill prophet Muhammad for doing Tableegh of his religion for 13 years. Prophet Muhammad used to openly criticize their idol gods.

But in Islamic Iran you are going to be killed immediately after changing your religion under the crime of MURTAD. (Shias are even worse than Sunnies in this regard. Sunnies allow 3 days to repent, but Shias kill all the Murtabds even giving them 3 days return option).

 

[mike2000 is back]

The issue is Iran's ordinary population is completely content being a Western Banana country like they were under the Shah.

Be just like the West and in return you get fancy military toys (that you can't do anything with without approval of your master). In exchange for being a banana country there would be very little reason for sanctions thus Iran would grow at a reasonable rate and a lot of foreign investment. To Most young people in Iran this is ideal. Unfortunately they don't see the bigger picture they only care about themselves.

But blaming the governemnt for corruption is hilarious. The amount of thievery, fraud, embezzlement, etc among Iran's population is staggerly high. Wether rich or poor, there are Iranians trying to hoodwink their fellow citizens.

So it's a bit hypocritical that the citizens protest against the government for the same alleged acts.

Let's not even mention how much other sins are committed by a supposed "religious" population.

The people of that country need to change if they expect their government to also have noble ideals and values.

As they say: the people get the government they deserve.

 

[mike2000 is back]

You did not reply to my post about Islam's killing of all Kuffar, or their becoming Muslim under the compulsion of sword.

And why Iranian Islamic Wali Faqih not acting upon Islamic Sharia and killing all Bahaies and Shias and Hindus and Buddhists....?

Do you really believe in such a religion?

Do you really believe that usurping the rights of Atheists, Bahaies and all Non Muslims to do Tableegh of their views is JUSTICE and HUMANITY?

Why can't you give Non Muslims the same rights which prophet Muhammad demanded for himself while living under the Kuffar of Mecca?

Actually you are far worst than the Kuffar of Mecca in this regards. They didn't kill prophet Muhammad for doing Tableegh of his religion for 13 years. Prophet Muhammad used to openly criticize their idol gods.

But in Islamic Iran you are going to be killed immediately after changing your religion under the crime of MURTAD. (Shias are even worse than Sunnies in this regard. Sunnies allow 3 days to repent, but Shias kill all the Murtabds even giving them 3 days return option).

Interesting. Never knew it was to this extent, even though I had a idea. Guess we learn something new everyday.

However, I still think since Iran is an Islamic state, they have the right to adopt Islamic laws whether those laws are repressive towards minority groups or other religious groups. Since at the end of the day these minority groups are but a minority living under a well known own Islamic state. So they have to abide by the rules of the country's religion, whether its unfair towards them or not. It's the choice of the majority and the state. If they are not happy about it they can always leave the country and go to Turkey, Europe, U. S or any country they feel they will be more at ease/free to practice and preach their religion freely under the law.

As you yourself said, Iran ( like many other Islamic states) have at least reformed in a good , since you can't always follow your holy books to the word, else they will be killing anyone who changes his religion from Islam to another religion (apostasy, is a dead sentence law in Iran like in many other Islamic countries as far as I know, even though it's hardly ever practiced), they will also be killing the unbelievers/atheists and people that are not of the book, who refused to convert or repent. etc. So as you can see Iran(just like all Islamic countries) too has reformed according to the modern world, whether they are aware of it or not. So I believe it's a good thing at least. So we have to look at things from the good/positive side as well.

 

[yavar]

Iran Intelligence Ministry dismantling MKO Terror cell, Borujerd انهدام هسته گروهک تروریستی منافقین

 

[veg]

Interesting. Never knew it was to this extent, even though I had a idea. Guess we learn something new everyday.

However, I still think since Iran is an Islamic state, they have the right to adopt Islamic laws whether those laws are repressive towards minority groups or other religious groups. Since at the end of the day these minority groups are but a minority living under a well known own Islamic state. So they have to abide by the rules of the country's religion, whether its unfair towards them or not. It's the choice of the majority and the state. If they are not happy about it they can always leave the country and go to Turkey, Europe, U. S or any country they feel they will be more at ease/free to practice and preach their religion freely under the law.

As you yourself said, Iran ( like many other Islamic states) have at least reformed in a good , since you can't always follow your holy books to the word, else they will be killing anyone who changes his religion from Islam to another religion (apostasy, is a dead sentence law in Iran like in many other Islamic countries as far as I know, even though it's hardly ever practiced), they will also be killing the unbelievers/atheists and people that are not of the book, who refused to convert or repent. etc. So as you can see Iran(just like all Islamic countries) too has reformed according to the modern world, whether they are aware of it or not. So I believe it's a good thing at least. So we have to look at things from the good/positive side as well.

I am afraid that NO Compromise could/should be made upon the "Basic Human Rights", which have already been mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in UN. And right to practice and preach religion is one of that basic Human Right.

If we accept that Majority have the rights to usurp even the Basic Human Rights, then all Islamic Countries would have still been practising the Slavery today.

Providing the minorities these basic human rights is not going to weaken Iran, but to strengthen Iran.

 

[ValerioAurelius]

I heared it has to do with the extreme corruption there. The clerics steal alot of money while people get poorer and poorer.

 

[Arminkh]

Since Iran is in no habit of calling international observers to cover its general elections.
No amount of insisting would be credible.

Honestly we couldn't care less. Iran is a great country with great culture. We don't need babysitters to handle our own affairs.

 

[BATMAN]

Honestly we couldn't care less. Iran is a great country with great culture. We don't need babysitters to handle our own affairs.

You always need Pakistan to blame, though!
Observers are not baby sitters, basically Iran is a closed state and you can't become great by just hiding your low.
Culture is reflected from your behavior, I hardly know any cultured Iranian on this forum.

 

[raptor22]

You did not reply to my post about Islam's killing of all Kuffar, or their becoming Muslim under the compulsion of sword.

And why Iranian Islamic Wali Faqih not acting upon Islamic Sharia and killing all Bahaies and Shias and Hindus and Buddhists....?

Do you really believe in such a religion?

Do you really believe that usurping the rights of Atheists, Bahaies and all Non Muslims to do Tableegh of their views is JUSTICE and HUMANITY?

Why can't you give Non Muslims the same rights which prophet Muhammad demanded for himself while living under the Kuffar of Mecca?

Actually you are far worst than the Kuffar of Mecca in this regards. They didn't kill prophet Muhammad for doing Tableegh of his religion for 13 years. Prophet Muhammad used to openly criticize their idol gods.

But in Islamic Iran you are going to be killed immediately after changing your religion under the crime of MURTAD. (Shias are even worse than Sunnies in this regard. Sunnies allow 3 days to repent, but Shias kill all the Murtabds even giving them 3 days return option).

To inform you that you do not know everything about Islam:

1) Kuffar of Mecca first tried to bribe him.
2) Then started to insult him throwing garbage at him, they encouraged kids to throw stones at him.
3) Haven't you heard the story of Yasir and his wife Sumayyah that were killed due to torture of Kuffar? killing and torturing of Muslims resulted in prophet ordering Muslims to immigrate to Ethiopia.
4) Next event was Meccan boycott of the Hashemites that somehow jailed and boycotted all Muslims for 3 years leaving their homes depriving them food and water .. not trading with them. if it wasn't God miracle that the parchment holding the boycott declaration, was found to be eaten by termites except the name of Allah Kuffar wanted to wage war against Muslims and kill all of them ...
5) Laylat al-Mabit is the night that the same Kuffar wanted to kill prophet and Ali slept in his place and the prophet left Mecca and went to Medina. so assassination attempt failed.
​

But about Iran:

The protests that ignited unrest in Iran happened in Mashhad, people whom lost their property 'cause of financial institutes were protesting peacefully as they'd been protesting for months before that. during all these protests predated 28 Dec unrest demonstrators chanting slogans against government, supreme leader, Jurisdiction system and its head and also entire system .. have you heard of any crack down against them? except some minor events ..?
Some of the protests against financial institutes:

​

Just this happen in Iran? No

​

But when it comes to Iran you should remember in none of western countries or other countries you can not find these things happens:

1) Iran economical problem is result of mismanagement and also long lasting sanctions, it means American and all those whom are trying to show their supports for Iranian people are part of problem and responsible of current Iran economy state and meanwhile they try 24/7 to blame Iranian government for this through their media , actually:

A 2009 manual published by Brookings Institution, a prominent U.S. think tank, states that “inciting regime change in Iran would be greatly assisted by convincing the Iranian people that their government is so ideologically blinkered that it refuses to do what is best for the people and instead clings to a policy that could only bring ruin on the country.”


"The Brookings paper asserts that in order to succeed at “inspiring an insurgency,” the U.S. would need to find a proxy and offers that the CIA “could take care of most of the supplies and training.” It suggests opting to help the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (aka MEK) “conduct effective operations and defeat larger Iranian military forces.” Sure enough, the CIA has been backing MEK, and its leader, Maryam Rajavi, explicitly urged more sanctions on the Iranian government following the recent protests."


"In June of this year, the CIA even created an organization focused exclusively on gathering intelligence about Iran, yet CIA Director Mike Pompeo denies the agency’s role in influencing any protests. “We have to ask why he felt compelled to issue a denial at all,” says Max Blumenthal, author of Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel. “Pompeo is deflecting from the fact that the Trump administration has seized aggressively on a relatively small and brief wave of protests to clamor for regime change and to justify extending sanctions against Iran.”
​

Even they wanted to arm protestors:

At the right moment, US must provide arms to Iranian protesters

"To be able to provide these arms, protesters who can bear arms have to be identified and contacted, and networks have to be built to supply the arms. These must be tailored to meet the needs of a variegated group of people operating in different environments: urban warfare, hit-and-run ambushes on roads and railway tracks, and hit squads attempting to assassinate regime officials and security personnel in a bid to turn the hunters into the hunted."
​

Syria number 2?

The next circus was bringing Iran protests into the UNSC, you can see what happened here.

Or:

UK spy agency GCHQ caught running fake personas on Twitter targeting Iran:

https://twitter.com/x/status/949279307645333504

Or Saudis:

2) A terrorist group that killed 17k Iranian including Iranian president, PM and spokesmen of Parliament and 72 MPs , attacked Iran alongside by Saddam, Participated and helped Saddam in killing and crack downing Kurds and Shia uprising in Iraq back in 90s under watchful eyes of Americans is now not only has got removed from terrorists group list by Hilary but also is welcomed in Paris and hold meetings by Saudis, American and israels annually for regime change in Iran.​

Coverage of Iran Protests Illustrated With Protests Not in Iran––Organized by Fringe Cultists

"When it comes to covering protests in other countries, it seems any vague picture of brown people protesting can stand in for those actually on the streets expressing their grievances. Since the outbreak of protests across Iran three weeks ago, several major outlets have used pictures of demonstrations in the United States, France, or United Kingdom—organized by a fringe, cult-like group, Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK)—in place of images of the entirely unaffiliated protesters, 6,000 miles away, who are the topic of discussion."
"Casually throwing around MEK images to represent unrest in Iran is the worst combination of insulting and sloppy. It would be like a Chinese outlet, in 2012, using images of a Westboro Baptist Church protest in a story about Occupy Wall Street, because both opposed the US government. The exact ideology of those protesting in Iran isn’t 100 percent clear—they seem to represent a mix of groups and grievances—but MEK has virtually zero support in Iran itself"
​

3) Some of riots and vandalism events are happening by order of some Tv channels broadcasting from the US even they attacked Iranian embassy in London set fired some mosques , Hussainye and ... have they tried to do anything against it? no ... here you can see from the USA the center of freedom and democracy he is calling for scorching families of security forces in their houses ...​

https://twitter.com/x/status/949386266587561984

​

 

[Stryker1982]

To inform you that you do not know everything about Islam:

1) Kuffar of Mecca first tried to bribe him.
2) Then started to insult him throwing garbage at him, they encouraged kids to throw stones at him.
3) Haven't you heard the story of Yasir and his wife Sumayyah that were killed due to torture of Kuffar? killing and torturing of Muslims resulted in prophet ordering Muslims to immigrate to Ethiopia.
4) Next event was Meccan boycott of the Hashemites that somehow jailed and boycotted all Muslims for 3 years leaving their homes depriving them food and water .. not trading with them. if it wasn't God miracle that the parchment holding the boycott declaration, was found to be eaten by termites except the name of Allah Kuffar wanted to wage war against Muslims and kill all of them ...
5) Laylat al-Mabit is the night that the same Kuffar wanted to kill prophet and Ali slept in his place and the prophet left Mecca and went to Medina. so assassination attempt failed.
​

But about Iran:

The protests that ignited unrest in Iran happened in Mashhad, people whom lost their property 'cause of financial institutes were protesting peacefully as they'd been protesting for months before that. during all these protests predated 28 Dec unrest demonstrators chanting slogans against government, supreme leader, Jurisdiction system and its head and also entire system .. have you heard of any crack down against them? except some minor events ..?
Some of the protests against financial institutes:

​

Just this happen in Iran? No

View attachment 447830
​

But when it comes to Iran you should remember in none of western countries or other countries you can not find these things happens:

1) Iran economical problem is result of mismanagement and also long lasting sanctions, it means American and all those whom are trying to show their supports for Iranian people are part of problem and responsible of current Iran economy state and meanwhile they try 24/7 to blame Iranian government for this through their media , actually:

A 2009 manual published by Brookings Institution, a prominent U.S. think tank, states that “inciting regime change in Iran would be greatly assisted by convincing the Iranian people that their government is so ideologically blinkered that it refuses to do what is best for the people and instead clings to a policy that could only bring ruin on the country.”


"The Brookings paper asserts that in order to succeed at “inspiring an insurgency,” the U.S. would need to find a proxy and offers that the CIA “could take care of most of the supplies and training.” It suggests opting to help the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (aka MEK) “conduct effective operations and defeat larger Iranian military forces.” Sure enough, the CIA has been backing MEK, and its leader, Maryam Rajavi, explicitly urged more sanctions on the Iranian government following the recent protests."
View attachment 447825 View attachment 447826

"In June of this year, the CIA even created an organization focused exclusively on gathering intelligence about Iran, yet CIA Director Mike Pompeo denies the agency’s role in influencing any protests. “We have to ask why he felt compelled to issue a denial at all,” says Max Blumenthal, author of Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel. “Pompeo is deflecting from the fact that the Trump administration has seized aggressively on a relatively small and brief wave of protests to clamor for regime change and to justify extending sanctions against Iran.”
​

Even they wanted to arm protestors:

At the right moment, US must provide arms to Iranian protesters

"To be able to provide these arms, protesters who can bear arms have to be identified and contacted, and networks have to be built to supply the arms. These must be tailored to meet the needs of a variegated group of people operating in different environments: urban warfare, hit-and-run ambushes on roads and railway tracks, and hit squads attempting to assassinate regime officials and security personnel in a bid to turn the hunters into the hunted."
​

Syria number 2?

The next circus was bringing Iran protests into the UNSC, you can see what happened here.

Or:

UK spy agency GCHQ caught running fake personas on Twitter targeting Iran:

https://twitter.com/x/status/949279307645333504

View attachment 447835
Or Saudis:
View attachment 447839

2) A terrorist group that killed 17k Iranian including Iranian president, PM and spokesmen of Parliament and 72 MPs , attacked Iran alongside by Saddam, Participated and helped Saddam in killing and crack downing Kurds and Shia uprising in Iraq back in 90s under watchful eyes of Americans is now not only has got removed from terrorists group list by Hilary but also is welcomed in Paris and hold meetings by Saudis, American and israels annually for regime change in Iran.​

View attachment 447832

Coverage of Iran Protests Illustrated With Protests Not in Iran––Organized by Fringe Cultists

"When it comes to covering protests in other countries, it seems any vague picture of brown people protesting can stand in for those actually on the streets expressing their grievances. Since the outbreak of protests across Iran three weeks ago, several major outlets have used pictures of demonstrations in the United States, France, or United Kingdom—organized by a fringe, cult-like group, Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK)—in place of images of the entirely unaffiliated protesters, 6,000 miles away, who are the topic of discussion."
"Casually throwing around MEK images to represent unrest in Iran is the worst combination of insulting and sloppy. It would be like a Chinese outlet, in 2012, using images of a Westboro Baptist Church protest in a story about Occupy Wall Street, because both opposed the US government. The exact ideology of those protesting in Iran isn’t 100 percent clear—they seem to represent a mix of groups and grievances—but MEK has virtually zero support in Iran itself"
​

3) Some of riots and vandalism events are happening by order of some Tv channels broadcasting from the US even they attacked Iranian embassy in London set fired some mosques , Hussainye and ... have they tried to do anything against it? no ... here you can see from the USA the center of freedom and democracy he is calling for scorching families of security forces in their houses ...​

https://twitter.com/x/status/949386266587561984

​

Where does this guy get the nerve to call himself Seyed.

 

[raptor22]

Where does this guy get the nerve to call himself Seyed.

Apparently.

 

[yavar]

Iran IRGC Quds Haj Qassem Soleimani riots, burning flag ایران حاج قاسم سلیمانی آتش‌زدن پرچم