Pakistans history is Pakistan's history, it is not Muslim or Hindu. I replied to you on that thread, but you didn't respond. According the quote I showed you, the Hindu contribution is not shown, if Indians don't want to show Muslim contribution then that's up to them, why should we lie in order to hide other peoples contribution, we should present the truth, not some of it but all of it.
The way you explain our history, if I may be bold enough to say, that you need to read more. You will find the answers.
Let me give you my opinion about why Hindu contribution may not have been covered as much as you thought it should have been.
Though during the uprising many Hindus and Muslims fought together against the British, many Hindus and Muslims sided with British and also fought against those who revolted. However, when the uprising was crushed it were the Indian Muslims who suffered the most. Majority of Hindus in the aftermath took advantage of the situation and not only sided with the British but also gradually replaced the Muslims in almost all government departments and functions. Muslims took the major blame of the revolt and not the Hindus, the British as well the Hindus of that era encouraged this perception.
All the blame was placed on Muslims and they became pariahs in their own land and most of this happened with the connivance of Hindus. The Muslims suffered tremendously in these environment. It was people like Sir Syed Ahmed along with many many others who attempted to bring the Muslims back into the fold through efforts aimed at re-educating them, encouraging them to join the mainstream and the government departments etc.
This brought to fore the Hindu Muslim divide as well. The Hindus preferred to serve the British and literally took revenge by working against the Muslims in all fora, for conquering India and ruling them for hundreds of years. Various Hindu movements originated and Hindu Muslim riots started happening in different parts of British India. Muslims, being in minority suffered tremendously in that era.
This is one of the reasons why Hindu contribution does not find much mention in our text books. Does the Indian text books mention that Muslims suffered during this era - no it didn't and i assure you that it would never.
I am not here to influence you or anybody. I am very clear in my understanding of our history. You make up your own mind.
TNT or not. Pakistan exists. End of discussion on TNT.
My question is TODAY, why do Pakistani's today talk of India as Hindu and Hindu's as Indians. Why do Pakistani's mix India and Hindu. We dont do it. We dont call or think of Muslims as any but Indians or Budhists or Sikhs or Parsis. We are all Indians.
And yet, Pakistani's cling on to the notion to keep justifying TNT by saying/feeling India is Hindu.
Why do you after over 65 years still call Pakistan, Muslim Pakistan. Most of you here talk nothing but Muslim this and Muslim that in Pakistan. We are also a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country, why do you people still keep it as grudge of sorts against Muslims. Why don't you just call Pakistan and mean it as Pakistan instead of it being Muslim Pakistan.
Let the bygones be bygones - and let it begin from you guys.
Oh they dont mean the paksitani Hindus...they mean the Evil yindoos of India ......also they dont mean All Yindoos...just the Caste Yindoos.....And come one When God itself doesnt care , why should they care about the kaffirs !!
You are so intelligent aren't you. You see the future and can judge the response because your own thinking is skewed and is bigoted.