What's new

What should Pakistan do to increase its economy and well-being

. . .
I dont know if it will be taken in the right spirit - but the way forward is to normalize relations with India and only way to do it is to the accept status quo,legalize it and move on.

That will be THE step to take for both parties and with good faith.
The statu quo should have a time frame and ongoing negotiations with a common objective of finding the most humane and optimum solution for the benefit of both countries and banning even the thought of force since it stems from Ignorance.
 
. . .
islamic02.jpg


An Islamic economic model, like the conventional economic models, is really the study of man and his behavior in the acquiring and using of resources for the satisfaction of the necessities, needs and other requirements of life. The Islamic economic model differs from the western one by placing emphasis on human and social considerations when making economic decisions. It does not merely seek profit, regardless of the cost. The criterion by which investment decisions are made should be the product of a mix of moral values, social aspirations and concerns, and a desire to fulfill other needs, feelings and emotions.

An Islamic economic model is an attractive alternative to globalised free trade, as it dictates that all economic activity has to have an ethical and moral dimension. It proclaims that life and property are a trust from God and absolute ownership resides with him and not man. Therefore, man does not have the right to destroy his life and property at will, or take advantage of others for his gain. Moral values and economic benefit to mankind as a whole would govern production and consumption. Nevertheless, freedom of enterprise is allowed, providing it is both moral and socially beneficial. The Islamic economic model disapproves of the western disregard of the global ecological balance, as it is offensive to the Islamic value system. It sees man as holding all of the earth's resources in trust for future generations of mankind. God, who ultimately owns all things, has placed this trust with man; to destroy these resources is therefore an offense to God. Although the profit motive is recognised as a legitimate driving force of economic endeavour, the Islamic economy condemns excessive profit and the charging of interest. An Islamic economy would not do what capitalism does, namely, legitmise greed and the pursuit of material gain.

Perhaps, the Islamic economic model can become a viable alternative to global laissez-faire capitalism. Its emphasis on a just distribution of resources, while recognising the principle of wealth creation, is ironically exactly what every anti- globalisation protester and environmentalist is calling for when they demonstrate against the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organisation and the World Bank. They too recognise the need for profitable economic activity. Their grievance is that the benefits of a globalised free market economy work to the benefit of those already rich, at the expense of the world's poor. They wish to see an economic system that is balanced and fair to all.

There is a huge bias towards the rich under capitalism; their huge reserves of wealth enable them to speculate on currencies, trade in shares and lend money through stock exchanges and money markets whose rules are written by the rich. Global currency speculation is particularly destructive and in many instances it destroys the targeted countries economy, leaving poverty in its wake. This bias also allows powerful global corporations and financial institutions to have free reign on the wealth of all developing countries as they open their economies to global free trade. Islamic economics could be the answer to the current Darwinian "dog eat do" trading system, that allows financial markets to control capital, regardless of the harm that it may do. A trading system based on the Qur'an and the Sunnah would provide an ethical and humane economic model in which speculation and interest would disappear, and money, once again, would become means of exchange and not a commodity for speculation.

In the search for a workable alternative to globalisation it needs to be recognised that it is now absolutely impossible to evolve any alternative based on nation states, or particular secular or religious beliefs. No state or religion by itself can find a viable answer to the challenge of globalisation. Information technology and modern transportation systems have enabled trade to cross borders to such an extent that today no one country or economy can stand alone and prosper.

However, for the global trading system to adapt an Islamic economic approach to globalisation it must not become dogmatic; it has to recognise that seeking change, improving our circumstances and seeking to advance ourselves is a fundamental human urge. Therefore, an Islamic economic model that denies this dynamic will become moribund. While it is right that there should be an underlying ethical and moral base to the Islamic economic model, any notion that economic behavior has the sole aim of conserving a certain social structure will fail. For Islamic economic theory to be successful it must incorporate the notion of change in its development. We cannot ignore the human urge to be creative. Humanity's creative drive has allowed humans to advance and transform the way in which they conduct their lives. An Islamic economic model should now, as it did in the past, allow mankind to continue to develop and grow.

The spiritual and moral values of an Islamic economic theory can offer a viable alternative to laissez -faire capitalism. It can create and develop markets, allow for entrepreneurship and develop banking and trade, but be based on a system that emphasises a fair distribution of the benefits of the Earth's riches by valuing human life above the blind pursuit of profit. Muslims and non-Muslims alike should argue for an ethical market; a market that is regulated not by the interests of any particular group, but on the basis of values. If this could happen, then we could shape a global economic system that comes closer to the values that are fundamental to all our religions.
 
.
That will be THE step to take for both parties and with good faith.
The statu quo should have a time frame and ongoing negotiations with a common objective of finding the most humane and optimum solution for the benefit of both countries and banning even the thought of force since it stems from Ignorance.

Leave most humane or optimum for the moment...the basic criteria for any solution to stand the test of time is only when both the countries feel that they have not lost 'face'..because this issue is deeply intertwined with the pride and ego of both the nations.

Only I could think of establishing it is by legalizing the status quo, converting LoC into IB so that both nations can claim to their respective domestic populace that they have not lost territory.
 
.
Ibn Khaldun's (15th century's) framework provides a summary of the interdisciplinary dynamic model for Islamic socio-economic system:
“The strength of the sovereign (al-mulk) does not become consumed except by implementation of the Shari'ah;
The Shari'ah cannot be implemented except by a sovereign (al-mulk);
The sovereign cannot gain strength except through the people (al-rijal);
The people cannot be sustained except by wealth (al-mal);
Wealth cannot be acquired except through development (al-‘imaran);
Development cannot be attained except through justice (al-‘adl);
Justice is the criterion (al-mizan) by which God will evaluate mankind; and The sovereign is charged with the responsibility of actualising justice”

Institute of Islamic Banking and Insurance - Islamic Economics
 
.
Don't make the mistakes India made and continues to do so.

Improve infrastructure.

Reduce red tape

Concentrate on Semi-conductor industries

Increase manufacturing share of GDP

Most importantly let this not come at the cost of agriculture or some traditional industries.
 
. .
Leave most humane or optimum for the moment...the basic criteria for any solution to stand the test of time is only when both the countries feel that they have not lost 'face'..because this issue is deeply intertwined with the pride and ego of both the nations.

Only I could think of establishing it is by legalizing the status quo, converting LoC into IB so that both nations can claim to their respective domestic populace that they have not lost territory.

Agree mate. Neither Pakistan can bear loss of territory nor India. So why fighting like kids? Make up and move on. With the billions saved in military expenditure, both of us can reach living standard of developed countries.
 
.
Leave most humane or optimum for the moment...the basic criteria for any solution to stand the test of time is only when both the countries feel that they have not lost 'face'..because this issue is deeply intertwined with the pride and ego of both the nations.

Only I could think of establishing it is by legalizing the status quo, converting LoC into IB so that both nations can claim to their respective domestic populace that they have not lost territory.

By saying "a time frame" we both agree on something, and by saying "banning even the thought of force" we again agree on something.
What we are saying requires real leadership from both sides and good faith.
So if it is about pride and ego of nations, there is not much to be done about it but to satisfy both sides. Intelligence, tact, good sense and good faith are the main keys to the solution.
 
.
Agree mate. Neither Pakistan can bear loss of territory nor India. So why fighting like kids? Make up and move on. With the billions saved in military expenditure, both of us can reach living standard of developed countries.

I hope India does not have that leverage! China will not allow ever lasting peace with Indian and Pakistan... Over many decades they have fed Pakistan as a pet to bite India!

There are people at both sides of the border does not want peace.... Pakistan Army will lose all it significance if there is peace with India!

Indeed British divide and rule policy is very powerful!
 
.
Sorry but this is not how it works. Implementing a model first need tweak in lot of foreign policies. All models have some assumptions. It is like going to gym, if you don't have proper diet exercise doesn't help.

When the hole political system seems to be driving on almost chaos mode, It needs more or less tweaking indeed, depending on the chosen model.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom