Aamir Hussain
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2007
- Messages
- 2,009
- Reaction score
- 33
- Country
- Location
which sea are you talking about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is talking about nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers. Then he means King of world sea.which sea are you talking about?
I guess we don't even need to work like DOGs or DONKEYZ for this $$$ or the GDP fraud stuff. We just need to follow the footsteps of the US by just start printing the US $$$ and use it ....We don't need to waste time for earning $$$...US never earned it and we don't need to earn it , they just print it and the whole world work for it ...US never work for it....so the whole world is termed as slave of their paper $$$/money.When we will have our own $$$ printing machines here then we can develop everything, Nuclear subs or whatever we like.......He is talking about nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers. Then he means King of world sea.
This is possible if we get Pace in economy and GDP around 7+. Inshallah this is possible, we will see 7+ GDP at the end of 2013 in the leadership of imran khan. Then with the GDP of 8+ in 2015, We will deal nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers.
No. It has frigates. It used to be the case that the UK designation of 'frigate' (FF) referred to a ship that under the US designation would be called 'destroyer escort' (DE). A destroyer escort is a destroyer which has sacrifices speed for range (i.e. fewer boilers but more bunkerage in the old days) and anti-ship weapons like torpedoes for a anti-air weapons like guns.The frigate/DE possessed less offensive firepower and speed than a destroyer, but such qualities were not required for anti-submarine warfare, which was their primary task.Does Pakistan Navy have a Destroyer ?
Does Pakistan Navy have a Destroyer ?
No and thats the ironic thing.... the people here seem to be planning a AC but their navy dosn't even have a destroyer for escourt
I guess we don't even need to work like DOGs or DONKEYZ for this $$$ or the GDP fraud stuff. We just need to follow the footsteps of the US by just start printing the US $$$ and use it ....We don't need to waste time for earning $$$...US never earned it and we don't need to earn it , they just print it and the whole world work for it ...US never work for it....so the whole world is termed as slave of their paper $$$/money.When we will have our own $$$ printing machines here then we can develop everything, Nuclear subs or whatever we like.......
---------- Post added at 02:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:13 AM ----------
We needa be smart in this world....
I'ld put a Dutch LCF (Zeven provincien class frigate) against most any current destroyer any day ;-)
[/img]
How about this going 1 on 1
King Sejong the great
^^^ Sir I was just asking that what can be the "outcome" if they both engage with 1 on 1 with nothing else(i mean platform like ship, a/c, or sub). So LCF is more stealthier than the other, now I don't know much about radars but they look to me at par, SMART-L is indigenous whereas SPY is American. The difference comes at firepower, LCF might be able to hide itself for some more time, but once it got on the screen of Sejong, the odds might be different. This is strictly my opinion, and I am just a layman in naval warfare, whereas you look very professional, so please pardon me...