what shall we do with afghanistan?????

[FaujHistorian]

---
Please see Afganistan as Nation not as strategic depth ..

strategic depth is a $tupid concept only popular among non-military folks.

In reality, Pakistan's effort was to avoid "strategic encirclement" when anti-Pakistan forces tried to be powerful in post-Soviet Afghanistan.

So please quit using obsolete and inaccurate terms.

Thank you

 

[Menace2Society]

Fence and mine the border and let them be until we've developed a strong economy.

After that .....

Annex Afghanistan !!!

Before this deport all Afghans from the country.

There was talk of a mass deportation of Afghans in 2012, why hasn't this happened???

 

[rockstar08]

This is what Pakistan must show to Afghanistan and Afghani's

 

[American Pakistani]

Offer them to join Pakistan if they refuse close the border by erecting wall/blockade.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

strategic depth is a $tupid concept only popular among non-military folks.

In reality, Pakistan's effort was to avoid "strategic encirclement" when anti-Pakistan forces tried to be powerful in post-Soviet Afghanistan.

So please quit using obsolete and inaccurate terms.

Thank you

---
thanks for updates..
but if thats so...
just take example of IA 814 hijack.
all 3 terrorist realsed now in pak if not 3 atelast 2 was .
one of them accuse d daniel pearl muder case ...
point is ..
if pak only looking for avoding cencirlment and not depth..
how can taliban deemaeds seems same as pak establsihment of 3 terrorist..
--
haqqani network also you can quote as tool for Str. Depth.

---
this is my interpretation ...
as per me pak alwasys wanted to control if not run afg. a extended version of pak .. the strategic depth
pak may be avoid enncirling as you say... which they are doing now .. exa. army ops..
Defining `strategic depth` - - DAWN.COM

 

[FaujHistorian]

---
thanks for updates..
but if thats so...
just take example of IA 814 hijack.
all 3 terrorist realsed now in pak if not 3 atelast 2 was .
one of them accuse d daniel pearl muder case ...
point is ..
if pak only looking for avoding cencirlment and not depth..
how can taliban deemaeds seems same as pak establsihment of 3 terrorist..
--
haqqani network also you can quote as tool for Str. Depth.

---
this is my interpretation ...
as per me pak alwasys wanted to control if not run afg. a extended version of pak .. the strategic depth
pak may be avoid enncirling as you say... which they are doing now .. exa. army ops..
Defining `strategic depth` - - DAWN.COM

Bro you are living in 80s


When Afghanistan was occupied by Russia for its "strategic depth"

Blame Soviets

Why to pick on your cousins across the border.

Hope you understand.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

Bro you are living in 80s


When Afghanistan was occupied by Russia for its "strategic depth"

Blame Soviets

Why to pick on your cousins across the border.

Hope you understand.

--
St. depth
yes
USSR referance .. right...
pak concern for same .. justified..
may be i have to update more
-
can you tell me what you call these 2 events wih referen to pak -afg / talib relatin ,
1. Hijaack of indian airleine and 3 terrrost frrred by india found in pak and on2 found in murder of daniel pearl
2. Haqqani netwrk and its control by pak establsihment

 

[FaujHistorian]

--
St. depth
yes
USSR referance .. right...
pak concern for same .. justified..
may be i have to update more

yes please do. Picking on the smallest player while giving clean chit to Iran, Turkey, Russia, India, and USA.

Not good. not very very very good.


Iran, Turkey, Russia, India, China, and USA all have pursued strategic depth in Afghanistan and forked it as if there was no end.

While most of them can get up, cleanup, and go home, Pakistan is stuck with "pregnant" Afghanistan.

Hope you understand now.

--

can you tell me what you call these 2 events wih referen to pak -afg / talib relatin ,
1. Hijaack of indian airleine and 3 terrrost frrred by india found in pak and on2 found in murder of daniel pearl
2. Haqqani netwrk and its control by pak establsihment

#1 was horrible.
#2 has been overplayed by other players.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

yes please do. Picking on the smallest player while giving clean chit to Iran, Turkey, Russia, India, and USA.

Not good. not very very very good.


Iran, Turkey, Russia, India, China, and USA all have pursued strategic depth in Afghanistan and forked it as if there was no end.

While most of them can get up, cleanup, and go home, Pakistan is stuck with "pregnant" Afghanistan.

Hope you understand now.




#1 was horrible.
#2 has been overplayed by other players.

--
dear
it may be your view..
the countires name above..
no clean chit to anyone .. neither ussr not usa.. not to pak too...
except russia /USA . not one sent militaty or created dummy mujahid .. called taliban...
--
Afg is key in central asia..and mineral rich county
please see my prviouspost for all links and documentary y 3rd party about same
so looking for gain through business and trade .. china .. india whihc i know ...
they dont indulege in any networks ...hope you get it...
-
indian airline hijak..
yes it was horrible..
how can terrorist freeed by plane hijak by thired person- taliban...
ask these people with no benefit to them diretcly..
and same guys found in murder in pak .. which vouch they not saint captuted by devil...
it was or is(may be ) policy of pak establsihment to use terorrist aginsat india as straegic weapon..
so direct benfit to pal est not talib...
so you can see who controls whom in 90s
but seems equaltaion change now...

 

[FaujHistorian]

--
dear
it may be your view..
the countires name above..
except russia /USA . not one sent militaty or created dummy mujahid .. called taliban...
.

hahahah


bro,

So you don't even know the name of "dummy Mujjahids" created/supported by India?

Man are you this naive about Afghanistan's military history.

Sorry to see this.

 

[Skyliner]

offer them to join pakistan?
one of the reason what karachi today is Afghani's
poora pakistan katti pahari ban jae ha ....

 

[pursuit of happiness]

hahahah


bro,

So you don't even know the name of "dummy Mujjahids" created/supported by India?

Man are you this naive about Afghanistan's military history.

Sorry to see this.

--
i know no dummy mujahid...
yes i have to update my history..
but can you answer my question raised ? please

 

[FaujHistorian]

--
i know no dummy mujahid...
yes i have to update my history..
but can you answer my question raised ? please

So you don't know which of the "mujahids" aka war lords were being supported, armed, funded by India?

Really?

 

[Fracker]

India is not interested in Afghanistan because that region is harsh and volatile, it will always remain unstable. India is only interested in building schools, hospitals, roads, housing societies for affected all those. How will this be destabalizing Pakistan, I doubt it.

If Indian has no interest in Afghanistan, they should stay awau. This will keep Pakistan also away. But indiam presence in Afghanistan will always keep Pakistan interested.

Its universal fact, india is Pakistan's enemy, so Pakistan will not allow east and weest both boarders go into enemies hand.

Pakistan try to stay away from Pakistan, and considered Afghanistan as a barking dog. Things went bad when ussr invaded Afghanistan, and start claiming Baluchistan as high way to hot water. I am sure now pakistan cant leave this side of boarderon risk for long.

 

[Screambowl]

If Indian has no interest in Afghanistan, they should stay awau. This will keep Pakistan also away. But indiam presence in Afghanistan will always keep Pakistan interested.

Its universal fact, india is Pakistan's enemy, so Pakistan will not allow east and weest both boarders go into enemies hand.

Pakistan try to stay away from Pakistan, and considered Afghanistan as a barking dog. Things went bad when ussr invaded Afghanistan, and start claiming Baluchistan as high way to hot water. I am sure now pakistan cant leave this side of boarderon risk for long.

I can judge from your statement that Pakistan is more interested in making Afghanistan a war zone.