N.Siddiqui
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 9,714
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
You mentioned Sheikh Rasheed revealed that the death toll at Uri was 177. How did he come up with such claim and is he mentioning the possible civilian death toll or just the # of soldiers killed in the attack?
If the death toll was 177, the reaction would've been on a whole new level and just wouldn't stop with surgical strikes and cross border firings. GOI is under tremendous pressure from the public and to act on Pakistan due to 26/11, Pathankot and Uri was where they had no other option but to react. Well I wouldn't want to go into the troll fest and fights of keyboard warriors that no surgical strikes took place or there have been 8-14 causalities on the Indian side due to cross border firing but I can say that if it was 177, all hell would break loose from both sides. Also, the attack took place on an army base that too by 4 terrorists, so it would be impossible for them to kill 177 jawans.
Check the Indian govt. version, they clearly said that most the army recruits were killed due to a fire incident during the Uri attacks, it's not that 4 terrorists killed 18/17 army men, 12-14 deaths were due to fire in the camp. So that idea holds true. This is also true Army uses tactical distorted figures, nobody gives advantage to its enemy country and tactical lies is a part of the war strategy...
Check Google about Goebbels truth/lies and how propaganda is used in a war, he was a Nazi party media propaganda specialist.