What Modi Has Not Recognised About Pakistan

[HariPrasad]

Modi actually made a new beginning with true heart but Pakistan once again went back to its old tactic of firing on border and meet Huriyat leader. They increased the infiltration. We can not have a dialogue when pakistna is stick to its old policy of back stabbing. Some time they cut the head of soldiers and some time heavy firing of LOC and border. This is unacceptable Modi government. Sushma clearly told that we are ready for dialogue without the shadow of terror. But pakistan is not ready to give up that 1000 cut policy. Hence the dialogues are futile.

 

[noksss]

A india ruled by a Modi is a reminder to every Pakistani why india is our enemy. Keep it up bharatis, please elect more Modis because it serves to unite Pakistanis behind their armed forces.

Don't you have anything apart from india to unite your country together?.

 

[Desert Fox]

Don't you have anything apart from india to unite your country together?.

No, i guess not.

 

[Hiptullha]

I actually completely fail to understand this man. For 67 years now we have had peace talks and negotiations, UPA had all kinds of talks, track 1 and 2 and 3. What did it achieve other than Mumbai attack?

Indian integration of Hyderabad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kashmir conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indus Waters Treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Post-Partition: India still owes Pakistan a little over Rs5.6b, says State Bank - The Express Tribune
Pashtunistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is peace talk? For much of the 20th century, it was not Pakistan but India which has caused trouble. On one hand, they cry about Kashmir and tribesmen fighting to liberate the country while annexing Hyderabad and Junagadh, and do not mind the usage of their own paramilitary forces in Kashmir to carry out widespread genocide. On one hand, they say Pakistan has caused disruption while failing to acknowledge how they tried to strangle and squeeze the life out of our small and helpless country through attempts to cut our lifeline and withhold money from us. They rant on about militancy and subversion when India supported Mukti Bahini and held close ties with the Soviet Union and Afghanistan who were involved in attempting to break up Pakistan.

He has so much empathy for the problems that Pakistan faced in nation building as a new country born in blood but how come he is so hard of heart when it comes to India. Does he think it was easy for india, most of the bleeding and riots were in the Indian side. In 1947 india was a country beset with famine, poverty, illiteracy, all kinds of fissures. How come Mani has not one drop of admiration that Indians picked themselves up and despite all the problems somehow worked to make things better with little or no help from our inept Congress governments. pakistan may work, but if he had an honest bone in his body, he would acknowledge that India works better despite having more problems, more people and more crooks like him.

Pakistan did not have the same power or authority as India, did it? It did not hold the most developed areas, it did not have the stronger military, it did not have anything to envy. India, which you have already acknowledged is a large, populous land, annexed Hyderabad, Junagadh, took a good chunk of Kashmir, went on to annex Goa, take Sikkim. Like I mentioned before, it resorted to cheap tactics like withholding vital assets to strangle a newborn country which was in an even worse position than them. Is this how a poor, helpless and desperate country acts?

He says he is ashamed of his PM , I can honestly say that I am ashamed of him. I am ashamed of his cravenness, I am ashamed that for half a century his party gave such bad governance to India. I am ashamed that in his opinion only that congenital idiot rahul is fit to lead this country. I am ashamed that despite everything these kinds of people are still so arrogant that they cannot see what a great harm they have done to us for so many years.

Instead of pointing out flaws in the article, you target what? The political allegiance of the writer? What does this have anything to do with what he is saying? This is foreign policy which the writer is talking about. Not the domestic policies. Come on for Christ's sake.

 

[noksss]

No, i guess not.

Then don't blame the PDF Indians for obsession

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Toilets, rape, LCA, Arjun, spy pigeons and CPEC are also issues India should worry about.

Toilets and rape also come under development category my dear senior member. Reg Defence products we can even buy foreign products for our defence.

CPEC have nothing to do with us. Stop bragging and come talk when the CPEC is finished. First complete the assessment. You guys have started talking as if the CPEC is operational.

 

[Donatello]

Toilets and rape also come under development category my dear senior member. Reg Defence products we can even buy foreign products for our defence.

CPEC have nothing to do with us. Stop bragging and come talk when the CPEC is finished. First complete the assessment. You guys have started talking as if the CPEC is operational.

Well, seems like highways and airports have a higher priority in 'development' in India than the toilets, sanitation and rape.

No one is bragging about CPEC....just that Indians been getting ulcers since day one. Work is in full swing.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Well, seems like highways and airports have a higher priority in 'development' in India than the toilets, sanitation and rape.

No one is bragging about CPEC....just that Indians been getting ulcers since day one. Work is in full swing.

For ur information, 12000 INR is provided to households which do not have toilets. Infact in my own native village.

I never mentioned CPEC . It was you who brought it again to bragg. Whether we build airport or highways its none of ur concern. Act like a seasoned personnel.