What's new

What is Your Opinion on Panama Leak's Judgement ?

What is Your Opinion on Panama Leak's Judgement ?


  • Total voters
    47
  • Poll closed .

Laozi

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
4,293
Reaction score
-27
Country
India
Location
India
Panama leaks: PM not disqualified, SC orders JIT to probe money trail

https://www.geo.tv/latest/138805-Pa...fied-SC-orders-JIT-to-probe-money-trail-qatar

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered further investigations into corruption allegations levelled by the opposition against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, saying there was insufficient evidence to order his removal from office.

"A thorough investigation is required," Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said, announcing the highly anticipated decision following a months-long hearing stemming from the Panama Papers leak last year that linked PM Sharif´s children to offshore businesses.

Announcing the verdict, Justice Khosa ordered the formation of a Joint Investigation team (JIT) to carry out an investigation into how funds were transferred to Qatar, which the prime minister's children said led to assets held by his sons through the offshore businesses in Panama.

The Supreme Court ordered the JIT to present its report every two weeks before a Supreme Court bench. The court also ordered Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and his sons Hasan and Hussein to appear before the JIT, which will complete its investigation within 60 days of its formation.

Justice Khosa said the chairman of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) had failed to carry out his duties.

He said the investigation committee comprising of one senior official each from NAB, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the Securities Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and the Military Intelligence (MI) will be tasked to carry out the probe.

The detailed decision by the apex court comprised a total of 540 pages, with the verdict split 3-2 between the five-member apex court bench.

Two dissenting judges on the five-member bench were of the opinion that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had not been honest to the nation and that he should have been disqualified.

The five-member bench led by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa had reserved its verdict in the case on February 23. The decision comes ahead of general elections scheduled to be held next year.

PM celebrates decision
The ruling Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) called the Supreme Court verdict a victory for the party.

Maryam Nawaz, the prime minister's daughter, tweeted photographs of Sharif in a celebratory mood with his family, embracing his brother Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif.Another picture showed the prime minister with Shahbaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam, Senator Pervaiz Rashid, and other senior PML-N leaders.



Follow
Maryam Nawaz Sharif

@MaryamNSharif

Praise & glory be to Allah alone. Shukrana & mubariks
1f60d.png


2:58 PM - 20 Apr 2017


Speaking to media following the decision, PML-N leader Khawaja Saad Rafique said that today Nawaz Sharif, his team, PML-N, our voters and all Pakistanis who are advocates of democracy won.

"The order to create a joint investigation team is the victory of the PM’s point of view,” Rafique added.

He added that with Nawaz Sharif in the lead, the PML-N will win in the in the people’s court in 2018. “Not only will we establish our government in all four provinces, we will also get two-thirds majority."

Speaking to Geo News in London, the prime minister's son Hasan Nawaz thanked God for the decision.

'PM should resign'
Speaking to the media outside the courtroom, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) spokesperson Fawad Hussain called for the prime minister's resignation.

"If the prime minister has any shame, he should resign today. The prime minister of this country will be presented in front of joint controller of the FIA," he said.

Two judges "have reached the conclusion that the PM should be disqualified," he said, referring to the dissenting opinion in the 3-2 split verdict.

Eagerly-anticipated verdict
The controversy erupted with the publication of the so-called Panama Papers last year, 11.5 million secret documents from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca which documented the offshore dealings of many of the world's rich and powerful.

Panamagate: A timeline of how it unraveled

Among the global elite implicated were three of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's – his daughter Maryam, and his sons Hasan and Hussein.

At the heart of the matter was the legitimacy of the funds used by the prime minister's children to purchase several high-end London properties via offshore companies.

Sharif's ruling PML-N party had insisted the wealth was acquired legally through family businesses in Pakistan and the Gulf.

But the opposition parties, including the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI), argued the paper trail for the funds was non-existent, and that the onus was on PM Nawaz Sharif to prove his relatives did not engage in money laundering.

The case took the country by storm and dominated headlines in the country for over a year now, with all eyes set on the Supreme Court in Islamabad for the much-anticipated verdict.

Security had been beefed up around the Supreme Court at Islamabad's Constitution Avenue, with additional barriers placed and barbed wires laid around several buildings.

Around 1000 police, Rangers and security personnel were deployed inside and outside the apex court building. A senior police official said entry of irrelevant persons in the Red Zone was blocked, while VIPs' security guards would also not be able to carry arms with them.

Read: PM says not waiting for any decision

Separately, around 2,500 police officers were deployed in the provincial capital Lahore ahead of the verdict, according to a Punjab police spokesperson. The security force included six superintendents, 29 deputy superintendents, 83 SHOs, 165 upper subordinates, and around 2,400 lower subordinates.

PTI, PML-N workers barred from going to SC
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had barred his party activists from going to the apex court, on the occasion of the announcement of a much-awaited verdict in the Panama leaks case. He said that no irrelevant person needs to go to the Supreme Court.

PTI chairman Imran Khan had also restricted his workers from coming to the apex court. He said only central leaders of the party would go to the SC.


PTI to accept any verdict by SC
Leaders from the opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, which has been a major stakeholder in the case, were optimistic for a positive judgment.

Speaking to reporters outside the Supreme Court, PTI central information secretary Naeem ul Haque said his party would accept the Supreme Court's verdict.

"Imran Khan has repeatedly said that the party will accept the SC’s verdict. We respect Pakistani courts and the SC is the highest court in Pakistan’s judicial hierarchy," Haque said.

"The SC's verdict on this case will be in favor of all Pakistani citizens," the PTI leader added.

Earlier on Wednesday, PTI leader Asad Umar said it was clear to him what the verdict would be.

"The evidence we saw during the last 12 months, the facts that were put before the nation, and what was presented to the Supreme Court. All facts and evidence are against Mian sb. When the nation sees that [Prime Minister] Nawaz Sharif could not bring anything other than the one Qatari letter, it is clear to us what the verdict will be," said PTI leader Asad Umar.

Read: PTI to hold rally after Panama Leaks verdict
 
.
Shouldn't the JIT be made long ago when all this fiasco started and investigations be concluded by now? People were waiting for final verdict. Let's see after 60 days.
 
.
Why there is no need to announce the case and delayed it for such a long period as the announcement is so......
 
. .
It is as expected in my case. Ptians and their leaders were just too over-confident..to percieve someone as corrupt is one thing and to prove them corrupt in court is different
 
. .
Its definitely not bad at the very least, one can call it average. More should had been done specially on suspension part. Having said that those who think PM is out of trouble waters, well that is not the case. The letter from Qatar has been rejected meaning Nawaz will have to come with something new. Also this will cause more embarrassment to the PM when a 19th grade officer calls him. Where the nation has waited for so long 60 days which is 3 months can be waited to see this case to his conclusion. Remember Nawaz never appeared before the court and a judgement cannot be given just like that. Its still a great achievement that 2 judges called for a direct disqualification of the PM. The remaining 3 called for a further investigation and not gave a clean chit as been propagated by the propaganda team of PML N on TV.
 
. .
Shouldn't the JIT be made long ago when all this fiasco started and investigations be concluded by now? People were waiting for final verdict. Let's see after 60 days.
That's what i'm saying to everyone. Forget the JIT verdict. It will not come before 2019. We got Diesel type people sitting in SC. What can you expect from them? Nothing. First clean up Supreme Courts then we will move forward. Otherwise, it will be the same story of 1 front foot & 10 back foots for the rest of Pakistan's future.

not sure boy or girl.........
Bilawal hoa hai.
 
.
still optimistic.i was never expecting a white or black judgement we cant afford to have civil war something that foreign powers are waiting for.The air of change has started flowing in the right path.AllahuAkbar
 
.
PM celebrates decision
The ruling Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) called the Supreme Court verdict a victory for the party.

Maryam Nawaz, the prime minister's daughter, tweeted photographs of Sharif in a celebratory mood with his family, embracing his brother Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif.Another picture showed the prime minister with Shahbaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam, Senator Pervaiz Rashid, and other senior PML-N leaders.

Lol, this reaction from the accused says it all.
 
. . . .
It is as expected in my case. Ptians and their leaders were just too over-confident..to percieve someone as corrupt is one thing and to prove them corrupt in court is different

I think you don't understand what happened. Ganjas were basically humiliated, 2 out of 5 said he should be disqualified. Other 3 favoured JIT for more investigation with in 60 days. Qatari letters were rejected, NAB Charmain not allowed to carry on investigation etc

Case isn't over yet.....
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom