Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everyone Marathas, Pashtuns, Rajputs, Jats, Ahoms etc. gave a good thrashing to him.
I guess thats why he expanded his empire by losing battles against hindus? Hindu logic ka jawab nai
He was a strong ruler, but he left his successors with a cash strapped empire and an aggressive enemy in the form of the Marathas.
He spent so much of the treasury to invade the Deccan, but the Marathas still survived.
He won war against Muslim sultanates of the South. Rest of the names I mentioned gave him a good thrashing.
He won war against Muslim sultanates of the South. Rest of the names I mentioned gave him a good thrashing.
LOL he beat up everybody he just couldn't wipe them out, his empire was intact and fell after he died.
He lost to the Ahoms and the Rajputs took back majority of Rajputana under his reign. Not to mention the Jat raids into his territory and Maratha conquests.LOL he beat up everybody he just couldn't wipe them out, his empire was intact and fell after he died.
But didn't Aurangzeb lose the battle to the Ahoms? And didn't Rajputs reclaim all there territory under his reign?He was one of the better Mughal rulers, unlike the wimp Akbar who was more interested to please his hindu wife then rule as a Mughal emperor. But ofcourse, hindus here will disagree for obvious reasons.
Marathas made his treasury dried up. In Assam, forces of Lachit Borphukan beat the crap out of Aurangzeb's army.
Lol another bs from hindutva historian lol
Aurangzeb was great, unlike Akbar who was only interested in Rajput girls for most of his life.