bd_4_ever
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,458
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Firstly: I think you missed one point in this thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-...akistan-simultaneously-indian-army-chief.html . Here the Indian army chief who made this statement. Remember he is an army chief. So even he said it as a fun but he knows that well that his neighbors will not take it as a fun. And, no doubt, this statement did not said by him without thinking his country's capability. May be they have not that much capability but they are intended to achieve so. Another think is, a fun done by such person, really, reflexes his intention. Such a person cannot make fun without backup. And here the backup is either he has already the capability or intended to achieve the capability. He must know the consequence of the fun, as his neighbors will take it as a challenge, and then he have to answer if attacked in future either he has the capability or not. I think there is a possibility of another war between IN and PAK.
Secondly: I understand that u think like a peaceful man. We also need to think like that. But, sad, the reality is different.
Suppose India will never attack us but if they will continuously interfere here, if BSF always continue killing, if they try to take over some portions in the Bay of Bangle, if they create pressure to our govt to give them favors which may be bad for BD, if they want to prove us vulnerable nation by deploying their force in Dhaka, if the underestimate us always, if they want to stop water. So what will do BD then even they will not attack?
In 52 Pak govt wanted to impose Urdu in BD.
Then BD people rebelled against Pak govt.
Then Pak force fired and killed Rafiq, Borkat, Salam and so.
Then we had to declare war against Pak for their misrules and the real war began in later in 71.
There Pak did not attack us at first but attacked when we demonstrated against their misrules.
So if India wants to dominate us without attack then what will u do? If you could stand against Pak in 52 then why not against India in future in case they will try to dominate us? And there is a chance of war (to me it is only 5% with India if they will continuously try to dominate us though they will never attack at first. So, it is not worthless to imagine a hypothetical war bet IN and BD at all. Suppose if BDR will fire against BSF at first for any unavoidable reason then there is a chance of war though it will not continue but we will have to lose many things in case we will not aware.
Dear brother, i was expecting a reply in that particular thread where i posted this. I did not understand why you replied me here. Ok...now i will reply by following your points...so pls synchronize it with your comments....
Firstly, in your first para i did not find even a single clue AGAIN what it has that to do with BD. Even you, brother, did not mention this word "BD" in your first para. But still you were trying to relate your point to BD. Right isnt it? Then, you mentioned the word "FUN". Brother, i dont have any idea WHY on earth would disclosing these military information would be "FUN", especially when it is by a General. Your whole point here was simply that he showed a bit of his muscles, so he must have some intentions and backup. Again tell me, where do you find BD in that intention? You are thinking that he bragged so much meaning something is really wrong...do you know that behind the scene may be he was critisized by the command for saying this? War is no "FUN" brother.
You said this "a fun done by such person, really, reflexes his intention". On first place how does "FUN" and "INTENTION" relate. That means all this he said was just FUN that he will take 96 hrs for china and 48 for pakistan and use algorithmic signals.... Do you think a General doesnt know that whats possible and whats not? Do you thing disclosing such information wont be suspected by pak-china? Still you call it FUN? Even US couldnt take Iraq of 22 million people in 96 hours my frnd....and he is talking about china of 1 billion or, for your sake, may be BD of 150 million.....
Again you said this..."and then he have to answer if attacked in future ". Brother doesnt this even make clear to you that he has to answer "IF" attacked....what shall i say more, dont you get it even now....
Secondly, i appreciate that you encourage the feeling of peace but yes reality is different.
Brother, you said everything based on future thinking like....."will continuously interfere", then "try to take over some portions", "deploying forces in dhaka" or "stop water". Tell me bro, are this ALL not happening now?? BSF always interfere, some portions are always taken, deployment was planned but later cancelled and about water, it was always under the indian dominance. Accept it bro, we are ALWAYS under indian supression....hard pill to swallow but true. And you are relating these DAILY issues to the threat of General Kapoor?? These things will always go on....there will always be border skirmishes, water will always be misused, land will always be claimed & captured...tell me honestly can u stop it?? Can i stop it?? can the indian posters here stop it?? tell me....Tell me the last time india used a SU-MKI or MIG to kill a farmer in our border??...Tell me the last time indian subs torpedoed a BN frigate??. We are under india's NON-MILITARY dominance....Accept that, the troubles you talked about are all politically-inclined and certainly, we are not here to discuss about that...you yourself said "I think there is a possibility of another war between IN and PAK.". Now tell me brother again, where does BD come in this subject???
Off course, "IF" we are attacked by anyone, may that be india, burma or US, we will fight back with everything we have...may that be even a .303 rifle. Then comes a different situation when our freedom is at stake. Same thing will happen that happened in 1971, fight to death....BUT you said..."India if they will continuously try to dominate us though they will never attack at first"...we, i am afraid, ALREADY are under indian dominance for a very long time, thus let alone a war....and this whole issue is political which is pointless discussing here. So refuting you, it is not worth imagining a hypothetical war....even if you do brother, do you think that imagining will change our fate....you think that imagining will turn tides in your "hypothetical war".....they wont. I love Bangladesh as much as you do, but i also live in reality and as you said....."But, sad, the reality is different."...yes, reality is very diferent..... reality is not hypothetical......
Peace brothers.....and any one is welcome to critisize......
Cheers!!!
Last edited: