What Iran Can Do to Strike Back

[Falcon29]

Oh come on, Israel's nuclear armed submarines will end Iran before you guys send your volley halfway. It's one thing to be patriotic it's another to be idiotic.

He doesn't actually mean it, he's saying it doesn't take much to significantly weaken Israel. Ballastic missiles can get through missile defenses and no real combat has ever been seen besides with old Scud missiles fired by Iraq which still managed to get through unintercepted. You also MIRV or MARV warheads which pose a greater challenge. Obviously Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons and if Israeli submarines ever make a fatal decision it won't end well.

Which is another reason why middle eastern nations need to address the Israeli nuclear threat one way or another. There needs to be mutual deterrence.

 

[doritos]

He doesn't actually mean it, he's saying it doesn't take much to significantly weaken Israel. Ballastic missiles can get through missile defenses and no real combat has ever been seen besides with old Scud missiles fired by Iraq which still managed to get through unintercepted. You also MIRV or MARV warheads which pose a greater challenge. Obviously Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons and if Israeli submarines ever make a fatal decision it won't end well.

Which is another reason why middle eastern nations need to address the Israeli nuclear threat one way or another. There needs to be mutual deterrence.

1991 SCUDS on Israel woke them up, they have taken action to defend themselves against such attacks from then

 

[Falcon29]

1991 SCUDS on Israel woke them up, they have taken action to defend themselves against such attacks from then

We're speaking about missile defense systems, not Israeli attacks against Iraq and Iraq's retaliation in self defense.

 

[doritos]

We're speaking about missile defense systems, not Israeli attacks against Iraq and Iraq's retaliation in self defense.

me too

 

[Informant]

He doesn't actually mean it, he's saying it doesn't take much to significantly weaken Israel. Ballastic missiles can get through missile defenses and no real combat has ever been seen besides with old Scud missiles fired by Iraq which still managed to get through unintercepted. You also MIRV or MARV warheads which pose a greater challenge. Obviously Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons and if Israeli submarines ever make a fatal decision it won't end well.

Which is another reason why middle eastern nations need to address the Israeli nuclear threat one way or another. There needs to be mutual deterrence.

Iran has conventional warheads, Israel has Nukes. Simple. No matter how many Iran fires, the success rate at distances over 2000km is a fraction. Then these missiles, MIRV or not, will have conventional warheads. Before Iran fires second salvo Iran will be turned into glass. And the Israelis wont shy away.

Militarily you can counter Israel with conventional weapons. But not non-conventionally.

 

[Falcon29]

Iran has conventional warheads, Israel has Nukes. Simple. No matter how many Iran fires, the success rate at distances over 2000km is a fraction. Then these missiles, MIRV or not, will have conventional warheads. Before Iran fires second salvo Iran will be turned into glass. And the Israelis wont shy away.

Militarily you can counter Israel with conventional weapons. But not non-conventionally.

Are you assuming Israel would use nuclear weapons over a small Iranian retaliation?

 

[Informant]

Are you assuming Israel would use nuclear weapons over a small Iranian retaliation?

Israelis? I would not be surprised.

 

[Falcon29]

Israelis? I would not be surprised.

Nobody will use a nuclear weapon and Iran doesn't have one. It will be extended conventional air raids and once the damage is assessed we will understand by them what the scope of the response would be. Although, if a deal does happen and Iran is given it's right to enrichment then we shouldn't expect any war scenario. So let's look at this from a strictly conventional POV, keep in mind those submarines I think are also used to fire cruise missiles, nobody knows if they are nuclear equipped, all we know is they're nuclear capable and Germany is stupid to give them away for free to Israel. In the end it depends on information which me and you the average people won't know about.

 

[Informant]

Nobody will use a nuclear weapon and Iran doesn't have one. It will be extended conventional air raids and once the damage is assessed we will understand by them what the scope of the response would be. Although, if a deal does happen and Iran is given it's right to enrichment then we shouldn't expect any war scenario. So let's look at this from a strictly conventional POV, keep in mind those submarines I think are also used to fire cruise missiles, nobody knows if they are nuclear equipped, all we know is they're nuclear capable and Germany is stupid to give them away for free to Israel. In the end it depends on information which me and you the average people won't know about.

Conventionally Iran is not really worthy adversary. Otherwise war isnt gonna happen. It will be disastrous for mullas and the world economy.

 

[Falcon29]

Conventionally Iran is not really worthy adversary. Otherwise war isnt gonna happen. It will be disastrous for mullas and the world economy.

Hezbollah can retaliate and hit Israeli targets and Iran has weapon trails that go through Syria into Lebanon. So they can hit Israel hard if they wish to, although like I said it depends on the damage done. And Iran has peaceful intentions with their program so Israel can't rally support for a strike unless everything tells us they're a week from a nuclear weapons so it won't really happen.

 

[Informant]

Hezbollah can retaliate and hit Israeli targets and Iran has weapon trails that go through Syria into Lebanon. So they can hit Israel hard if they wish to, although like I said it depends on the damage done. And Iran has peaceful intentions with their program so Israel can't rally support for a strike unless everything tells us they're a week from a nuclear weapons so it won't really happen.

Sure proxy groups can cause terror, but Israel's retaliation would level whatever Lebanon is. Or WB or Gaza is. You guys will pay the price for Iranian games. I for some reason believe you guys ( Palis) are being led on by Iran and the Arab world for their own gain. And you guys lap it up good.

 

[Falcon29]

Sure proxy groups can cause terror, but Israel's retaliation would level whatever Lebanon is. Or WB or Gaza is. You guys will pay the price for Iranian games. I for some reason believe you guys ( Palis) are being led on by Iran and the Arab world for their own gain. And you guys lap it up good.

There's no terror involved, Israeli aggression against Iran will be met with an Iranian response, possibly including Hezbollah. Palestinians will have nothing to do with such a skirmish/war.

 

[Best Land]

Oh come on, Israel's nuclear armed submarines will end Iran before you guys send your volley halfway. It's one thing to be patriotic it's another to be idiotic.

israel will be destroyed with one bomb;but iran is as large as half of europe,a bomb can destroy one city or town of iran.even if iran attack israel with thousands missle israel will not use nuke beacause if iran use one of them and ride it on a missle then there is no more zionist or israel.so israel does not suicide itself and this is very clear.

 

[SALMAN F]

Oh come on, Israel's nuclear armed submarines will end Iran before you guys send your volley halfway. It's one thing to be patriotic it's another to be idiotic.

One missile at dimona and th Zionist state will be finished.and also the land of Palestine will be impossible to live in because of radiation