Going by You... It should be Indics, no?... I wrote Turkics and Iranics because they are rather well defined... Uzbeks, Turkmens, Kazakhs, Uighurs, Hazaras and Kyrgyz are Turkic's ethnic and linguistically... Pashtuns, Tajiks and Baloch are Iranic mixes along with languages...
Does India have the suffix 'stan'?
It's not quite cut and dry as you make it. How are Hazara Mongols 'Turkic'? And where do Armenians fit? There are many more I could cite.
Like fcuk they are. How are Hazara Turkic? Or are they Iranic because they speak Dari?
Of course this exposes you as a Gangu hiding behind American flags. Tell me are Tamil, Bihari, Malaylam speaking their gibberish all 'Indics'? And what is 'Indic' anyway? Name rooted to Indus but now covers head shakuing Biharis with gibberish speaking Tamils.
U r mixing it up.Does India have the suffix 'stan'?
It's not quite cut and dry as you make it. How are Hazara Mongols 'Turkic'? And where do Armenians fit? There are many more I could cite.
Hazara Mongols for instance speak derivitive of Farsi, but are genetically analogous to Mongolians and are Muslim. Or many of the Turkics you mention are Turkic speaking but of varying mixes underlying stratum. It is not cut and dry like you paint it. All that rubbish is tripe and self serving.
Like fcuk they are. How are Hazara Turkic? Or are they Iranic because they speak Dari?
Of course this exposes you as a Gangu hiding behind American flags. Tell me are Tamil, Bihari, Malaylam speaking their gibberish all 'Indics'? And what is 'Indic' anyway? Name rooted to Indus but now covers head shakuing Biharis with gibberish speaking Tamils.
Well, if Indic as Indus Pakistan defines it ... they are Indics... while those who call themselves Indians would be gangatic, no? Either way, it is all for laughs only... don't take it personal. I have no interest nor intention to be another Indus Pakistan here... let him be your guide.Does India have the suffix 'stan'?
It's not quite cut and dry as you make it. How are Hazara Mongols 'Turkic'? And where do Armenians fit? There are many more I could cite.
Hazara Mongols for instance speak derivitive of Farsi, but are genetically analogous to Mongolians and are Muslim. Or many of the Turkics you mention are Turkic speaking but of varying mixes underlying stratum. It is not cut and dry like you paint it. All that rubbish is tripe and self serving.
Like fcuk they are. How are Hazara Turkic? Or are they Iranic because they speak Dari?
Of course this exposes you as a Gangu hiding behind American flags. Tell me are Tamil, Bihari, Malaylam speaking their gibberish all 'Indics'? And what is 'Indic' anyway? Name rooted to Indus but now covers head shakuing Biharis with gibberish speaking Tamils.
Stan sir zameen shad baad
Though, if you think about... it is Pakistan's backyard... Pakistan can be energy independent owing just to this region. Plus there is abundance of natural resources. Putting ethnicities and languages aside, the region has no other outlet and that is the reason for their misery. CAR's economies are muffled exactly because of this reason. If you ask them they'd never choose to be client states of Russian Federation. Geographically this region is indispensable and historically, eternally connected with the people of Pakistan.
is it weird that i actually had a dream about this some time back? These nations uniting to become one under Pakistan. Although in my dream it was Pakistan uniting them.
Our historic region extends from Indus River (Sappta Sindhava) all the way up to Ferghana.
Even the people of Southern Uzbekistan like Termez (Tirmidh) look exactly like Pakistanis, it is also the hottest place in Uzbekistan.
Once Afghanistan and Pakistan merge naturally, others will join as well. Most likely Tajikstan and Uzbekistan. It may become a necessity as world events push us together.
Pakistan represents a gift to this region, as we survived Soviet invasion and preserved our Islamic culture which were lost by our brothers and sisters in the CARs.
Actually we are mostly Iranics too (from Scythian, Kushan, and Hepthalite origin.) IVC and Greek remnants were swamped by Iranic settlement starting from around 1 bc.
However Punjabi and Sindhi languages mixed and melded into what it is today by heavily borrowing from many sources including ancient IVC, Iranics, Persians, Arabs, and Turks/Mongols. In turn Punjabi was the main precursor to Urdu, which further borrowed from Dari. It makes Urdu in its highest form a dialect of Dari (Eastern Persian.)
