What's new

What If Bengal emerged as a unified nation post 1947 ?

Following the dissolution of the British Raj, Should Bengal have emerged as an independent nation ?

  • Yes, Bengal should have emerged as an independent nation held together by Bengali Culture.

    Votes: 19 63.3%
  • No, as history has shown, Muslims & Dalits couldn't have lived with the abusive landowning brahmins.

    Votes: 11 36.7%

  • Total voters
    30
  • Poll closed .
Guilty by way of existence, such is the fate of those who oppose the whims of Tareq Rahman's little poodlie woodlie lapdogs.
Almost same case in BAL lapdogs too. I have been tagged several time as a Markhor because I refused to hate Pakistanis . My Mujib and Hasina fandoms did not save me from this tag. For them every Bangladeshi who do not hate every single Pakistani , are Markhor , and they hold the absurd idea that it's holy duty of a patriot Bangladeshi is to hate every Pakistani blindly. Even this kind do not contact their own people because they have slightest difference in opinion . I have seen many Idune type in my real life bhai . Bangladesh is a unique country in this planet brother , where only minority ( ideological ) ruled since it's creation , and majority are neglected. In future maybe a non political head of state can rule Bangladesh and can meet the demand of majority .
 
Last edited:
.
Stupid idea.

Hindus worship cow while muslims eat cow. Hindus worship idol while muslims hate idolatry. Hindus cremate dead while muslims bury the dead. The worst part is that historical heroes of Hindus are enemies of muslims e.g. Chhatrapati Shivaji and the historical heroes of muslims are enemies of Hindus e.g. Aurangzeb Alamgir.

The population of combined bengal would be like Lebanon, 55% muslim and 45% Hindu. You are basically asking for religious riots and religious violences.
 
.
You are basically asking for religious riots and religious violences.
You lost your mind . He can have his opinion , and you are over reacting on a simple thing . Calm down .

Hindus worship cow while muslims eat cow. Hindus worship idol while muslims hate idolatry. Hindus cremate dead while muslims bury the dead. The worst part is that historical heroes of Hindus are enemies of muslims e.g. Chhatrapati Shivaji and the historical heroes of muslims are enemies of Hindus e.g. Aurangzeb Alamgir.

The population of combined bengal would be like Lebanon, 55% muslim and 45% Hindu.
 
.
Stupid idea.

Hindus worship cow while muslims eat cow. Hindus worship idol while muslims hate idolatry. Hindus cremate dead while muslims bury the dead. The worst part is that historical heroes of Hindus are enemies of muslims e.g. Chhatrapati Shivaji and the historical heroes of muslims are enemies of Hindus e.g. Aurangzeb Alamgir.

The population of combined bengal would be like Lebanon, 55% muslim and 45% Hindu. You are basically asking for religious riots and religious violences.


Still less violent than what happens in peace loving Burma; North Korea V2 - the nukes.
 
.
That ill be great, cause bangalies were great politicians and has better educated leadership then the east pakistan!
Molana bhashni, and other leaders from bengali part were better pplls and still in pakistani history they are heros!
Not giving the rule of Pakistan to bengalies was the biggest blunder ever happened in pakistan, if they been given the roles of PM of Pakistan instead of bhuttos and ayub khans Pakistan may hve been 10 times better then of today!
 
.
In the end, BD and PAK has come togather either it happens after 10 years later or 100 years later, it ill bound to happen cause there is a book which binds them in then end
 
. .
And, it was not a million soldier sacrifice. India lost only 1,300 IA troops in the east but won a war that changed the geo-politics of South Asia. Now, tell me how would you have won such a war without us helping you?

India should thank us for awarding such a win almost without no loss of manpower.

Off course we are thankful to bangladeshi brothers .
 
.
Back
Top Bottom