ashok mourya
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,957
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
In India every state has own language,,dance,food,clothes and looks that's gives us identity with shared history of state...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he is right you should know that
Cracked ....
Cheers, Doc
lol. Say hello to the Pot for me?Hello Pot, Kettle said Hi.
The Indus Basin does a good job of defining Pakistani geography.
In India every state has own language,,dance,food,clothes and looks that's gives us identity with shared history of state...
True. So if we follow your line of reasoning and as a doctor you should be firmly embedded in logical thinking does it not follow that Dravidian India needs to split and make it owns country as it rightly qualifies your measure of "racial and civilizational heterogeneity"?But with that you have political and racial and civilizational heterogeneity.
Not so for peninsular India (your blue zone).
No it has not. Unless making a claim makes it fact. You see dots. You make it 'homogenous" because you want to. It's absurd. That way I can make the same claim for Pakistan and push the timeline to 100,000 years !It's been racially, politically and civilizational homogeneous for 10,000 years.
Fantastic reply. These Gangoo's can't understand the simple concept that Pakistan is a federation on the Indus Valley of four provinces that were part of the British Raj prior to 1947. Insofar as Bharat is a union of states on the Ganga/Dravidia that were part of the British Raj prior to 1947.In Pakistan every state has its own language, food, clothes, style and looks that gives us identity with a shared history of state that begun on 14th August 1947, ONE WHOLE DAY BEFORE INDIA
True. So if we follow your line of reasoning and as a doctor you should be firmly embedded in logical thinking does it not follow that Dravidian India needs to split and make it owns country as it rightly qualifies your measure of "racial and civilizational heterogeneity"?
No it has not. Unless making a claim makes it fact. You see dots. You make it 'homogenous" because you want to. It's absurd. That way I can make the same claim for Pakistan and push the timeline to 100,000 years !
Then why have you got a border with Nepal - which is more Hindoo then you, or Sri Lanka whose religions are part of 'Hindu civilization' as well as sharing those wonders called Tamils and or even Myanmar etcBut we forged our identity on the basis of the Hindu civilization.
I don't understand why identity has been an issue for Pakistanis after all this time we have been Pakistanis. If British/French/etc. can go to Australia and have an Australian identity. If British/French/Germans can go to North America and have a Canadian/American identity...Considering the number of identity threads we have all going from the students of Sir Syed, to the progeny of Mohammed bin Qasim down to the first man who decided to sit by the Indus and fish, I think we should all identify as weapon systems now; I am a F-16. @Indus Pakistan
and i thought only i make cringe posts, my thread is getting cringierSouth India are definitely the most homogeneous part of India.
Many of them also think like you do. Some on PDF as well. @manlion
But we forged our identity on the basis of the Hindu civilization. Not erace or ethnicity or currently practiced faith or even native bloodlines (us, siddhis, Bohras, Jews).
Cheers, Doc
I m not..talk after 10 years till then this issue in cold boxYes you are.
i made a mistake and call it identity i should have call what modern image of pakistan in eye of foreigner should be?I don't understand why identity has been an issue for Pakistanis after all this time we have been Pakistanis. If British/French/etc. can go to Australia and have an Australian identity. If British/French/Germans can go to North America and have a Canadian/American identity...
...then why is this still an issue for us?
It is precisely this conflict that led to the creation of Bangladesh. It created an "us vs them" narrative, where "Bengalis" saw themselves at odds with "Punjabis" or "west Pakistanis"...and "west Pakistanis" looked down on "Bengalis". Had we all considered each other and ourselves "Pakistanis"...all as sons of the soil...it would've promoted more unity/brotherhood and an "us vs them" narrative would've been hard to come by. Even today a lot of idiots make their career in politics based on creating such divide for Muhajir/Punjabi/Sindhi/Baloch/etc...and ppl start following like blind sheep.
Yes we can be Punjabi/Pukhtoon/etc. and take pride in our heritage but WE ARE ALL PAKISTANIS. We don't need validation from anyone neither arabs nor indians nor anyone who tries to tell us who we are or where we come from. We took Pakistan for us so we can live free...and that's that.