What does China think about Kashmir. My POV

[saadee]

LOL You mean Sushil Kumar Shinde. So much for research. All your rants have been answered troll, Go home.

When a loser like you can't prove his point, he always look for corners like you do. Do you homework next time before bitching over the internet.

 

[KingMamba]

SO you have no quote claiming the exact charge you levied on me, just your vivid imagination. Thank you.

I thought I was clear as could be about how your views imply Chinese supporting the Indian position when it concerns Kashmir. If you still do not see it then I cannot be of help. Anyway it is late.

 

[Steakhouse]

The chinese support for Pakistan in each and every Indo-Pak war has always been tokenism rather than anything substantial.

In 1965, I am not aware of any fighter jets being provide by China to pakistan. At that time PAF was superior and already scoring better on IAF.

Fighter jet provided to Pakistan not substantial support from China?

 

[third eye]

Go to sleep. Not your fault that you are an Indian. Denial is something in your blood. Guess what? It always your fault right?

Answer my questions instead of making silly remarks.

We Indians have missed this dam in Ferozepore completely.

 

[saadee]

No. He is right.
India is putting its money where its mouth is. India has spent and is spending billions of dollars on walling and fencing the border with Pakistan for just one single reason - that no Pakistani is able to enter India.

Similarly, should not the Pakistani Govt/Army put its money where its mouth is - and also build walls and fences to keep Indians out.

Who wants to deal with trouble makers like you anyway? Should Pakistan stop giving visas to Sikhs so you guys don't send sarabjits and surjeets in Pakistan? Bingo.

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

I hope you are not serious with this statement. Statute of limitations only applies in common law states and has nothing to do with international disputes, not to mention statute of limitation usually has to do with criminality. In fact the only time statutes of limitation is mentioned in terms of international law is to say that it does not apply for international crimes such as genocide, etc. Of course I may be mistaken so please expand on your point.

Oh lord help me tonight! It was not meant to be literal. wow!

 

[third eye]

There will be no referendum on Kashmir; pure and simple.

Its got nothing to do with either Kashmirs clamoring for Independence or dying to become a part of India; its got everything to do with India's economy and the large market it presents to otherwise stagnant economies in the West and the East.

Those hoping for International mediation shouldn't hold their breaths for too long because international relations and diplomacy is a euphemistic way of saying that you can be as hypocritical as you want to be and not get called as such as long as you have the right nuisance value.

India's economy has that value; ours does not otherwise countries that were born out of the 'right to self-determination' from our colonial masters would not be denying it to others and finding legal loopholes and jargon to mask their hypocrisy.

Thats just the way things are; so build the economy up, increase your international clout and learn how the game works to get what you want and have even your most blatantly hypocritical acts rationalized away.

Nice to read thoughts of a realist.

 

[Judge]

Who wants to deal with trouble makers like you anyway? Should Pakistan stop giving visas to Sikhs so you guys don't send sarabjits and surjeets in Pakistan?

Another tangential reply which has no bearing on what I raised.

The ones who come with visas are tracked. Its the ones who jump the border who come with a one way ticket to paradise.
If Pakistan actually felt that Indians are causing problems, they would. The same way India has spent billions of dollars to ensure that Pakistanis do not come to India and we are continuing to spend more money to make the wall/fence more effective.

Put your money where your mouth is.

 

[saadee]

No. He is right.
India is putting its money where its mouth is. India has spent and is spending billions of dollars on walling and fencing the border with Pakistan for just one single reason - that no Pakistani is able to enter India.

Similarly, should not the Pakistani Govt/Army put its money where its mouth is - and also build walls and fences to keep Indians out.

Look who is talking? The one who couldn't save his six sailors from MV SUEZ? Guess what? Poor families of those sailors turned to Pakistan for the help while your government kept BS with its people? So building a fence is more important to you rather than saving your own people right? Who gave the money to save those sailors? Your government? lmao

 

[Lord ZeN]

Gilgit Baltistan region wants to become a Pakistani province. I believe they too should have a referendum to set this thing straight.

Similarly Jammu( 65% Hindu) & Ladakh (majority Buddhist) are also Indian province without any dispute.

 

[saadee]

Nice to read thoughts of a realist.

NO REFRENDUM IN KASHMIR SEE HOW YOU SPILLED THE BEANS

 

[Judge]

Look who is talking? The one who couldn't save his six sailors from MV SUEZ? Guess what? Poor families of those sailors turned to Pakistan for the help while your government kept BS with its people? So building a fence is more important to you rather than saving your own people right? Who gave the money to save those sailors? Your government? lmao

Again, another reply that has nothing to do with what I said.

I said why does Pakistan not put its money where its mouth is. The rest of the countries do.
We dont want Pakistanis coming to India so we have built an wall and fence.

Iranians dont want Pakistanis jumping over their border so they are doing this too:
Iran constructing fence on Pakistan border – The Express Tribune

Similarly, why does Pakistan not spend money to ensure that Indians and Iranians(who also have a problem with Pakistanis on a one way paradise ticket) dont enter Pakistan.

 

[PoKeMon]

Fighter jet provided to Pakistan not substantial support from China?

Hang on Buddy.

First establish the fact that China did supply fighter jets to Pakistan. I am not apprise of this thing and I believe its not true either.

Can you quote some credible source for your claim?

 

[Selous]

There is not going to be war unless we see another 26/11. Which if it were to happen, would mean Pakistan would be heavily sanctioned and isolated. Even then, it will be a limited engagement ( mini war), and there is no chance of Pakistan using any nuclear weapons because of the limited nature of the engagement.

There is only one way for both countries and most importantly for Pakistan to get back to being economy focused and successful. That is accepting current boundaries.

I've had this discussion a hundred times with different people in different governments. Sixty plus years = statute of limitations has expired.

This thing has run its course.

Pakistanis don't think like you do...we will go nuclear...whether engagement is limited or shadi honi wali hai.

 

[PoKeMon]

When a loser like you can't prove his point, he always look for corners like you do. Do you homework next time before bitching over the internet.

Kid - have you completed your homework on veto and Azad kashmir thing?

Or just ignoring the hard facts and indulging in pure trolling?