ANPP
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 819
- Reaction score
- -1
but not everything is god
In everyone means in everythng, even in your last post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but not everything is god
In everyone means in everythng, even in your last post.
DIFFRENCE BETWEEN ISLAM AND HINDUISM
hinduism=everything is God
Islam=everything is GOD'S
you just used 50 words to describe pascal's wager.. (issue with pascal's wager is.. it makes an assumption that god likes people who believe in him without evidence)Agnostic/Atheists are taking a risk not worth it when compared to their religious counterparts.
A religious person or a person who believes in god will lose probably nothing even if what he believes is not true, on the other hand atheists are taking a risk by choosing to follow reasoning and logic and there by refusing to believe with out proof that there is a god. he is not gaining any thing big if he is indeed right, but he has more to loose if he was wrong..So one may say it's a risk not worth taking.
now this is the hight of stupidity even though i enjoyed your innocent joke
my post are just the rays of light and electrons and mangnetic arrangement of electrons, nothing more
why not?...............
That means your parents did not teach u the proper essen e of hinduism.
you just used 50 words to describe pascal's wager.. (issue with pascal's wager is.. it makes an assumption that god likes people who believe in him without evidence)
It makes an assumption that god loves sycophants... it imposes human like attributes on god (like god is looking for human love or acceptance or acknlowgement, like a celestial dictator who loves his followers no matter how blind the reason may be) where as he/she might be interested in a rational/intelligent person... who arrives at incorrect conclusion but using the evidence available..yes you are right it's his theory which I put in my words.
not just believing but following the book/rules/rituals etc. I think this theory makes some sense in it's calculations/assumptions
It makes an assumption that god loves sycophants... it imposes human like attributes on god (like god is looking for human love or acceptance or acknlowgement, like a celestial dictator who loves his followers no matter how blind the reason may be) where as he/she might be interested in a rational/intelligent person... who arrives at incorrect conclusion but using the evidence available..
Also, not sure god will like people who hedges their bets... because god is all powerful, he will know if you are believing him not really, but by cold calculation.
Dude, he said all other religions are sh!t. That you think is acceptable on a forum ? This one statement is the reason why I told him to read forum rules.
There is no concept of conversion in Hinduism and it's a good thing.