IbnAbdullah
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2018
- Messages
- 1,584
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Salaam
From a cursory glance, it seems that the total tax collection figure has a massive portion (56%) of tax collected that is from companies.
Punjab, however, has the highest number of filers by a long margin (59%in Punjab whilst the remaining 27% Sindh, 6% KPK and 2% Baluchistan and G.B).
So for instance, if Engro paid a certain amount of tax, would that ve counted as tax collected from Sindh because the head office is in Sindh? Or does it take into account the massive revenue generated from fertilizer sale in Punjab as tax from Punjab?
However, more importantly, if tax collected is higher from Sindh and/or Punjab, should Baluchistan and KPK and GB be given lesser power somehow?
What exactly is being hinted at when issues of who pays more tax are brought up? Especially, when such is done without proper in depth analysis?
Here you go. Its 2018. 2019 is still being worked on.
Remind me later, and i will share with you the excel sheet, so you can work on the data easily
From a cursory glance, it seems that the total tax collection figure has a massive portion (56%) of tax collected that is from companies.
Punjab, however, has the highest number of filers by a long margin (59%in Punjab whilst the remaining 27% Sindh, 6% KPK and 2% Baluchistan and G.B).
So for instance, if Engro paid a certain amount of tax, would that ve counted as tax collected from Sindh because the head office is in Sindh? Or does it take into account the massive revenue generated from fertilizer sale in Punjab as tax from Punjab?
However, more importantly, if tax collected is higher from Sindh and/or Punjab, should Baluchistan and KPK and GB be given lesser power somehow?
What exactly is being hinted at when issues of who pays more tax are brought up? Especially, when such is done without proper in depth analysis?