What's new

Were the people of the Deccan the most powerful people in South Asian History

Foot12

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2013
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
The people of the Deccan created some of the greatest and most powerful Dynasties in South Asian history
like the Satavahana Dynasty, Chalukya Dynasty, Rashtrakuta Empire, Western Chalukya Empire, Vijayanagara Empire and Maratha Empire. They were very successful in resisting foreign invasions and inflicted crushing defeats on foreign invaders like the Scythians, Arabs, Turks, Mughals, Portuguese and even the British. The history of the people of the Deccan started in the 2nd century BC when the Satavahana Dynasty was established. The Satavahana Dynasty rose to prominence in the 1st and 2nd century CE when the Dynasty defeated the Scythian invaders, who had conquered Central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of Iran, and protected huge parts of India against the Scythian invaders.
After the collapse of the Satavahana Dynasty the Vakataka Dynasty emerged and was responsible for the
protection of the Deccan against the expansion of the Gupta Empire which dominated whole northern India in the 4th and 5th century.
From the 6th to the 8th century the famous Chalukya Dynasty ruled the Deccan and played a prominent role in the history of India. In the early 8th century the Arabs of the Umayyad Caliphate established an Empire which stretched from Spain and Portugal in the west to Persia and Afghanistan in the east. The Arabs also invaded Gujarat but the Arabs were defeated by Vikramaditya II of the Chalukya and were driven out of Gujarat. This victory stopped the expansion of the Arab caliphate in the east.
From the 8th to the 10th century the Rashtrakuta Empire of the Deccan dominated the major part of the Indian
Subcontinent and was the most powerful Empire of South Asia in the 9th and 10th century.
In the 14th century the famous Vijayanagar Empire was founded in the Deccan which delivered crushing
defeats on the Turkic invaders who at that time had conquered Central Asia, Persia, Afghanistan and northern India. The Vijayanagar Empire successfully defended major parts of the Deccan and southern India against the Turkic invaders for almost 300 years and the rulers of the Vijayanagar Empire became the most powerful kings of whole India in the 15th and early 16th century.
In the 17th century the Marathas under the leadership of Shivaji Maharaj of the Deccan founded the Maratha Empire which defeated the Portuguese and the Mughals. In the 18th century the Maratha Empire conquered the major part of northern India and became the major power of India.
What were the main reasons for the success of the Deccan people in the past and even today.
 
Even today the people of the Deccan are the most successful people of South Asia.
Maharashtra and Karnataka are some of the most developed regions of South Asia.
I think it has a lot to do with the culture of this region why the people of the Deccan were so
successful in the past and even today.
 
While I argued we people in Deccan were a WALL between deep south India and Msulin dominated North India....

Roughly calculating, we in central deccan were under muslim empires just for one or two centuries.... Just between period of Vijaynagar empire and maratha empire
 
While I argued we people in Deccan were a WALL between deep south India and Msulin dominated North India....

Roughly calculating, we in central deccan were under muslim empires just for one or two centuries.... Just between period of Vijaynagar empire and maratha empire
It was definitely less than 2 centuries. The Vijayanagar Empire collapsed in 1646 and even its last ruler defeated the Turkic
invaders several times before his death. And only 30 years after the collapse of the Vijayanagar Empire Shivaji emerged
in the Deccan and established the great Maratha Empire which defeated the Mughals and conquered the major part of northern
India. The Maratha rulers not only defeated the foreign invaders but they also raised the Deccan flag in northern South Asia as the Satavahana rulers during ancient period and Rashtrakuta rulers during early medieval period did.
 
Every region of India has had it's time. For a very long time in the history of South Asia, it was the land of Magadh(Bihar eastern UP) which was the political/economic/military center. Deccan was also successful though.
 
Every region of India has had it's time. For a very long time in the history of South Asia, it was the land of Magadh(Bihar eastern UP) which was the political/economic/military center. Deccan was also successful though.
Not every region. The northwestern part had a weak military history as it was mostly under foreign rule.
Bihar and UP were only a military center during the Maurya period. During the Gupta period the region was quite powerful
but the Gupta rulers failed to invade the Deccan because of the Vakataka Dynasty.
 
It was definitely less than 2 centuries. The Vijayanagar Empire collapsed in 1646 and even its last ruler defeated the Turkic
invaders several times before his death. And only 30 years after the collapse of the Vijayanagar Empire Shivaji emerged
in the Deccan and established the great Maratha Empire which defeated the Mughals and conquered the major part of northern
India. The Maratha rulers not only defeated the foreign invaders but they also raised the Deccan flag in northern South Asia as the Satavahana rulers during ancient period and Rashtrakuta rulers during early medieval period did.
Deccan was subjugated by khiljis while tuqhlaqs directly annexed it to sultanate of Delhi, so deccan was under muslim rule for more than 6 centuries.
 
Not every region. The northwestern part had a weak military history as it was mostly under foreign rule.
Bihar and UP were only a military center during the Maurya period. During the Gupta period the region was quite powerful
but the Gupta rulers failed to invade the Deccan because of the Vakataka Dynasty.
By North Western India I think you mean Punjab/Haryana and surrounding areas? thing about Punjab is that it was located in the worst possible place in India. Right next to Punjab is central Asia which had the roughest, toughest and most ruthless warriors. That's probably why Pothoharis like Gakhars, Janjuas etc are strong people. They had to fight with these central asians while they made their way into India. Had Punjab been located in any other part of India and saw peace instead of constant invasions, then it's very likely Punjab would have been a powerhouse. Magadh and Deccan did not see the amount of invasions as North Western India did.

I don't know if you believe in Mahabharat or not, but when that war happened, all the strong armies and warriors were from North western India like Gandhara, Madra, Anga, Kurus and Panchaal wasn't too far away either.
 
Deccan was subjugated by khiljis while tuqhlaqs directly annexed it to sultanate of Delhi, so deccan was under muslim rule for more than 6 centuries.
Not really. Muslim rule started in northern Deccan in the 14th century while southern Deccan was ruled by the Vijayanagar Empire. Much of northern Deccan was reconquered after the establishment of the Maratha Empire.
 
By North Western India I think you mean Punjab/Haryana and surrounding areas? thing about Punjab is that it was located in the worst possible place in India. Right next to Punjab is central Asia which had the roughest, toughest and most ruthless warriors. That's probably why Pothoharis like Gakhars, Janjuas etc are strong people. They had to fight with these central asians while they made their way into India. Had Punjab been located in any other part of India and saw peace instead of constant invasions, then it's very likely Punjab would have been a powerhouse. Magadh and Deccan did not see the amount of invasions as North Western India did.

I don't know if you believe in Mahabharat or not, but when that war happened, all the strong armies and warriors were from North western India like Gandhara, Madra, Anga, Kurus and Panchaal wasn't too far away either.

North has always produced the best warriors in India for the longest time. Even today the best athletes and wrestlers come from the North. We were under Muslim rule longer only because of our close proximity to power and resource hungry Afghans and Central Asian Turks. We were always the first line of defence against foreign invaders and for the most part we did well, especially if you look at the lack of success in India of Persians. Greeks, Arabs and Mongols.

Two of the most important and powerful empires in India were also from the North - Mauryas and Guptas.
 
You're damn right. Tamizha Rattam da!

4344628f520.jpg
 
Deccan was subjugated by khiljis while tuqhlaqs directly annexed it to sultanate of Delhi, so deccan was under muslim rule for more than 6 centuries.

Deccan was under Vijayanagar Empire for most of medieval Indian history, it wasn't rule by Muslim dynasties as North India was. Morever, after Vijayanagar Empire was destroyed, with few decades Maratha Empire controlled all of it.

Even today the people of the Deccan are the most successful people of South Asia.
Maharashtra and Karnataka are some of the most developed regions of South Asia.
I think it has a lot to do with the culture of this region why the people of the Deccan were so
successful in the past and even today.

The main reason is remoteness of Central and South India while North India was subjugated to frequent invasions.
 
North has always produced the best warriors in India for the longest time. Even today the best athletes and wrestlers come from the North. We were under Muslim rule longer only because of our close proximity to power and resource hungry Afghans and Central Asian Turks. We were always the first line of defence against foreign invaders and for the most part we did well, especially if you look at the lack of success in India of Persians. Greeks, Arabs and Mongols.

Two of the most important and powerful empires in India were also from the North - Mauryas and Guptas.

It's silly to argue like that. Some S.Indian kingdoms were very powerful as were some N.Indian kingdoms. Fighting abilities are not always as cut & dry as you seek to make it out to be. Govinda III of the Rashtrakutas was probably one of India's greatest warriors and he was pretty much the unquestioned emperor with everyone including the Kingdoms of N.India accepting his supremacy. Even true of his father, the illustrous Dhruva Dharavarsha who regularly took on & defeated most Indian kingdoms including from N.India.

(Even more silly to throw athletes into the mix- for the longest time, the best athletes came from Kerala and even now one of India's biggest athlete is Vikas Gowda who pretty much towers over the others. Would it be logical to infer that S.Indians are on average bigger & faster? It wouldn't, neither would your argument)
 
Back
Top Bottom