We will sink 2 Aircraft Carriers and kill 10000 Sailors if the US stands in way of China's SCS Goals

[GumNaam]

The US isn't afraid to take casualties, have people forgot the Second World War in the Pacific?

The problem is that China is no japan...with a population 5 times the us's and manufacturing base far larger than the us, they may just give uncle sam the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. The Chinese generals don't just shoot off the cuff remarks, whatever they say is very well thought out and calculated before they say it. and let's not forget, beginning with Vietnam and forward all the way to today, uncle sam has lost the appetite for putting up with getting body bags back...

 

[Nilgiri]

The Chinese generals don't just shoot off the cuff remarks, whatever they say is very well thought out and calculated before they say it. and let's not forget, beginning with Vietnam and forward all the way to today, uncle sam has lost the appetite for putting up with getting body bags back...

Kind of funny you mention China, generals, Vietnam and "appetite" all in one para. How did 1979 go?...China lost "appetite" very quickly....even with bold "well thought out + calculated" general (and higher than them paramount leader) statements....and they had to then see the indemnity of continued occupation ( a direct stated objective of China to stop with that war) of Cambodia (by Vietnam) at the end of it @Viva_Viet @Viet @Carlosa @Aqsuperman

It actually says a lot that China has not engaged in any war since that one....the bruising was severe and not healed...and that too from much smaller country....so one can do the necessary extrapolations @hellfire

 

[GumNaam]

Kind of funny you mention China, generals, Vietnam and "appetite" all in one para. How did 1979 go?...China lost "appetite" very quickly....even with bold "well thought out + calculated" general (and higher than them paramount leader) statements....and they had to then see the indemnity of continued occupation ( a direct stated objective of China to stop with that war) of Cambodia (by Vietnam) at the end of it @Viva_Viet @Viet @Carlosa @Aqsuperman

It actually says a lot that China has not engaged in any war since that one....the bruising was severe and not healed...and that too from much smaller country....so one can do the necessary extrapolations @hellfire

Still trying to console your the throbbing hemorrhoids from the 1962 dry arse rape of your bunghole, aye? Laga ray bayhari laga ray!

 

[BringHarmony]

When was the last time Chinese actually won a Naval battle?

The problem is that China is no japan...with a population 5 times the us's and manufacturing base far larger than the us, they may just give uncle sam the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. The Chinese generals don't just shoot off the cuff remarks, whatever they say is very well thought out and calculated before they say it. and let's not forget, beginning with Vietnam and forward all the way to today, uncle sam has lost the appetite for putting up with getting body bags back...

Precisely China is not Japan. When it comes to war they surrender first and talk later. Like World War 2.

 

[GumNaam]

When was the last time Chinese actually won a Naval battle?


Precisely China is not Japan. When it comes to war they surrender first and talk later. Like World War 2.

Think your confusing roc with prc.

 

[BringHarmony]

Think your confusing roc with prc.

ROC or PRC how does it matter? Chinese are same.

 

[GumNaam]

ROC or PRC how does it matter? Chinese are same.

Oh it matters a lot. It's all about the political ideology. First the roc surrendered to Japan and then ran away with their tail between their legs from the communists. Their political ideology is that unless they have an uncle sam behind them, they'll cut and run without putting up any fight.

 

[royalharris]

There will be no war between China and USA even if trump become 10 times mad

The situation is different with that of WWII, the war between China and USA will destroy the whole world
USA just need learn the word of "fair play" and respect other nations

Most USA people are nice, China and USA have a history with good relaitons, they can solve the problems

 

[paritosh]

The US isn't afraid to take casualties, have people forgot the Second World War in the Pacific?

I was thinking of the same thing before I read your comment. The higher the jingoism, the more is the propensity to take causalities during the actual conflict

55,000 deaths in Vietnam and they retreated. WW2 was different. US entered late in WW2 after all the powers were exhausted.

I am not sure if Vietnam was unwinnable had america not had massive civilian protests. Public sentiment is an important factor. They were winning against afar more powerful enemy in the Pacific by having the american public's backing

 

[Nilgiri]

Still trying to console your the throbbing hemorrhoids from the 1962 dry arse rape of your bunghole, aye? Laga ray bayhari laga ray!

It was dealt with in 1967 already....and then we got to do certain "things" in 1971 to your lot that obv you never consoled with....it was fun replacing crescent and star with a huge bindi for a whole half of a country!....and then mard -e momin ppl cry and release a butthurt stamp over it! Dayum!

@hellfire

 

[GumNaam]

It was dealt with in 1967 already....and then we got to do certain "things" in 1971 to your lot that obv you never consoled with....it was fun replacing crescent and star with a huge bindi for a whole half of a country!....and then mard -e momin ppl cry and release a butthurt stamp over it! Dayum!

@hellfire

And yet you still miserably failed to annex and absorb bd in india! if we lost to anyone, we lost to the majority population of the two Pakistan wings, you merely helped the wretched politicians like bhutto and mujib get what they wanted. what's your excuse for getting your bungholes butchered in 1948, 1962, 1965 and 1999 except for inferior dna and p!ss poorly trained so called military?

 

[maithil]

Last "war" China was involved in, was in 79 with Vietnam. Did not go well for China. Since then China's best weapon is their ministry of warnings.

 

[Feng Leng]

Last "war" China was involved in, was in 79 with Vietnam. Did not go well for China. Since then China's best weapon is their ministry of warnings.

LOL at the Gangdeshi so humiliated from Doklam!

 

[zectech]

We sink two carriers to kick USA out from East Asia. Then we will sink two more carriers to kick USA out of Hawaii. Then we sink the rest of their carriers to kick USA out of California.

Our mission will not be finished until we raze Washington DC and New York City to the ground!

When we nuke USA, we will focus our nuclear warheads on the cities with the most white Americans. This way, mostly black Americans will survive and they will kill the remaining white Americans.

Per capita, blacks are more deadly than guns in Amerika. 75% of homicides are from guns, 55% of homicides are from black Amerikans. There are nearly 400 million guns and only 45 million African Amerikans (including black babies and elderly).

Being in a room with just a loaded gun is not as dangerous as being in a room with a black individual with a loaded gun.

China should develop R&D:

rail guns ships
submersible ADS, SAM subs with added torpedo tubes.
submersible fleet
an unsinkable battleship (to anti-ship missiles) with hundreds of anti-air VLSs.
an smaller sub with only torpedoes and and MANPADs, nuclear powered if possible. To take out the helicopter sub hunters.

add many more subs, 500 or more.

 

[LeGenD]

The problem is that China is no japan...with a population 5 times the us's and manufacturing base far larger than the us, they may just give uncle sam the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is. The Chinese generals don't just shoot off the cuff remarks, whatever they say is very well thought out and calculated before they say it. and let's not forget, beginning with Vietnam and forward all the way to today, uncle sam has lost the appetite for putting up with getting body bags back...

Wars are destructive events in general, but US have fought many over the course of years. Since 9/11, US struck 3 countries in total (Afghanistan in 2001; Iraq in 2003; Libya in 2011) and executed 'regime change' in all. Name one country which have gone this far in a long span.

Uncle Sam have not lost the appetite for putting up with getting body bags back; not even close. Check the list of American military operations after the Vietnam War; it is not small, and I recall 6 at this instant. In fact, Americans have managed to minimize their casualties even in prolonged engagements by incorporating new set-of-tools and tactics in their methods of warfare; Vietnam War was a fantastic teacher on so many counts.

Sinking a USN CVBG is not a child's play. One can talk big from the safety of his/her home, or claim to be a war theorist, but China is lacking in operational exposure, and their is no guarantee that assets like DF-21D will deliver against a mobile force. At present, USN is the only force in existence with solid defenses against ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, and its operational footprint is vast (active in all oceans for decades). Their is no substitute for operational exposure, and what it can teach to the willing; ask any professional.

Anyways, look for this file on Google:

What it takes to successfully attack an American Aircraft Carrier - Lexington Institute