We Will Repel You - Chines DF-21 Ballistic missile

[gambit]

Concept art?

More like wishful thinking. We should not fault the Chinese military for trying anything, no matter how fanciful, and the US military does take the issue under concern. However, the common denominator that I see among the Chinese supporters here is nothing more hyperboles of what the DF-21 purportedly can do. I said it before and I will repeat, in a missile against ship scenario, even if the miss is only one meter, the ship win. So unless the descending warhead is nuclear, at 30kts the carrier will have a location displacement of several km from the time the warhead is at apogee to when it hit the sea's surface. This is conditional upon the real time updates of the ship's position which China's OTH radar system can be taken out or at least severely disrupted in the start of the conflict. The Chinese fanboys here simply cannot accept the laws of physics, military history and common sense.

 

[desiman]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/52432-china-testing-ballistic-missile-carrier-killer.html

Concept art?

photoshop

 

[desiman]

More like wishful thinking. We should not fault the Chinese military for trying anything, no matter how fanciful, and the US military does take the issue under concern. However, the common denominator that I see among the Chinese supporters here is nothing more hyperboles of what the DF-21 purportedly can do. I said it before and I will repeat, in a missile against ship scenario, even if the miss is only one meter, the ship win. So unless the descending warhead is nuclear, at 30kts the carrier will have a location displacement of several km from the time the warhead is at apogee to when it hit the sea's surface. This is conditional upon the real time updates of the ship's position which China's OTH radar system can be taken out or at least severely disrupted in the start of the conflict. The Chinese fanboys here simply cannot accept the laws of physics, military history and common sense.

Gambit I hate to say it, but its really tough to beat you lol Great comments by the way

 

[Spitfighter]

Assume the DF-21 is deployed...

Over-the-horizon radars operate in the meters length bands -- HF/UHF/VHF. The antennas are massive, in the meters diameter range. They are fixed. Because of the freqs/bands employed, they have very poor target resolutions, for surface and airborne targets. USAF B-1s and B-2s will conduct dual attacks on these stations, removing the DF-21's long range eyes.

Say Pakistan gets a hold of these missiles, or 'develops' them, what options, if any, would India have to counter the threat?

 

[below_freezing]

More like wishful thinking. We should not fault the Chinese military for trying anything, no matter how fanciful, and the US military does take the issue under concern. However, the common denominator that I see among the Chinese supporters here is nothing more hyperboles of what the DF-21 purportedly can do. I said it before and I will repeat, in a missile against ship scenario, even if the miss is only one meter, the ship win. So unless the descending warhead is nuclear, at 30kts the carrier will have a location displacement of several km from the time the warhead is at apogee to when it hit the sea's surface. This is conditional upon the real time updates of the ship's position which China's OTH radar system can be taken out or at least severely disrupted in the start of the conflict. The Chinese fanboys here simply cannot accept the laws of physics, military history and common sense.

actually, the chinese government has said NOTHING about the DF-21 being able to hit us ships. i bet it's actually the US government releasing fake news again.

 

[Cityboy]

More like wishful thinking. We should not fault the Chinese military for trying anything, no matter how fanciful, and the US military does take the issue under concern. However, the common denominator that I see among the Chinese supporters here is nothing more hyperboles of what the DF-21 purportedly can do. I said it before and I will repeat, in a missile against ship scenario, even if the miss is only one meter, the ship win. So unless the descending warhead is nuclear, at 30kts the carrier will have a location displacement of several km from the time the warhead is at apogee to when it hit the sea's surface. This is conditional upon the real time updates of the ship's position which China's OTH radar system can be taken out or at least severely disrupted in the start of the conflict. The Chinese fanboys here simply cannot accept the laws of physics, military history and common sense.

wow. .amazing . .worth reading it. Great

 

[Communist]

actually, the chinese government has said NOTHING about the DF-21 being able to hit us ships. i bet it's actually the US government releasing fake news again.

Man, don't say the truth.

The anti China Neo Nazi Chinese haters will become upset.

 

[MZUBAIR]

Buddy...China's defenses can be on full alert and it still would not matter, or would not matter much against a B-1/B-2 attack.


Different? Is that all? What was it you just said about 'smart answer'? Try giving the readership one.

Even 4 tp 6 B2- Stealth are enough to do a job.

How many battles will USA open

USA vs Russia.
USA vs Iraq.
USA vs Afghanistan.
USA vs Iran
USA vs China.
USA vs Korea.
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------

I think most of these are misconceptions

I dont think any aggressions between China and USA.....then Y we are discussing it. I dont see any war or conflict between USA and China in coming 10 years

 

[aimarraul]

How many battles will USA open

USA vs Russia.
USA vs Iraq.
USA vs Afghanistan.
USA vs Iran
USA vs China.
USA vs Korea.
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------

that's what WLA is supposed to do,free the world,then free the universe.Jake Sully，help us.....

actually, the chinese government has said NOTHING about the DF-21 being able to hit us ships. i bet it's actually the US government releasing fake news again.

we better prepare,that's how Iraq war started

The Chinese fanboys here simply cannot accept the laws of physics, military history and common sense.

actually we don't believe it either,but normal americans are very easy to be fooled, so next time using martians as the excuse if your govt want to increase defence budget .

 

[below_freezing]

that's what WLA is supposed to do,free the world,then free the universe.Jake Sully，help us.....



we better prepare,that's how Iraq war started



actually we don't believe it either,but normal americans are very easy to be fooled, so next time using martians as the excuse if your govt want to increase defence budget .

fake news department of the CIA must have stayed up a long time for that.

 

[gambit]

fake news department of the CIA must have stayed up a long time for that.

We are trying to keep up with the PLA's Photochop dept.

 

[gambit]

actually we don't believe it either,...

You do not believe in the laws of physics? I am sorry to hear that.

...but normal americans are very easy to be fooled,...

This DF-21 item have been posted here before many times with many Chinese members supporting it. Guess we know now who are the foolish ones here.

...so next time using martians as the excuse if your govt want to increase defence budget .

So what was China's excuse to increase the PLA's budget? Taiwan?

 

[aimarraul]

This DF-21 item have been posted here before many times with many Chinese members supporting it. Guess we know now who are the foolish ones here.

does the number reach to 300million people? "they have bombs..... "

So what was China's excuse to increase the PLA's budget? Taiwan?

the backstage manipulator

 

[H2O3C4Nitrogen]

why there a need to modify a ballistic missile to hit cariers, sounds kind of vague , why not do some R&D onto long range torpedos ..!

 

[Bull]

You in hurry miss some points..I know that I am not a military expert but thanks for reminding me again. I never said that you cannot destroy the "fixed" radars..all I said was that if those radars are hit than still China has alternative policies..
You are forum type of guy maybe retired but those people who make strategies knows live updates. You cannot compare your "mental capacity" with them..

It's what a random guy here saying that the U.S. will do this and that but you don't have any clue of counter strategies from the other side..

Lets try again....shall we???

B 1 or B 2 bombs those radars..than what?
There are other weapons also..
I think that your thinking spectrum only evolves around one given example.
So, kindly think in a broader way and those radars are not a "small god" kind of thing, without them China can still survive and it can still hit your defence areas easily.

So kindly read my posts again and you will find that I never said that the U.S. cannot hit anything, all I said was that China is well aware if "you" as being inferior in knowledge than Chinese Commanders can enlighten us with different techniques.

.

What sort of dumb arguments are you making? Why dont you just say what you know rather than saying 'we wont take it lying down'.