What's new

We need two more years to defeat Pakistan | Subramanian Swamy

. .
I wouldn't say it's the wrong conclusion, I'd say it's a different interpretation. It's also not really that clearly worded. For example, how does he propose to neutralize China? The Soviets don't exist, and China doesn't care what the US and Russia say.

I think we can all agree that this interview is ridiculous and should never have been conducted to give this lunatic a bigger voice.
I gave an example based on what India has done before. China was neutralized for a successful war with Pakistan.

I have drawn the RIGHT conclusions which your Jingoism isn't capable of accepting, which is not your fault. He is obvious, but not more obvious than us.
I gave very clear conclusion of his interview.
You have full rights to disagree with what he says and implies, but you do not have the right to say what he did not.

You drew the wrong conclusion and I put forth exactly where you concluded the wrong things. You disagree with what he says, you can feel that he is wrong on what he says, but you cannot change what he said based on your 'interpretation'.
If our existence is threatened, India will cease to exist.
Meh..your capability even at full capacity is doubted by various analysts here. So there really is no point in reiterating this.
 
. .
What the fu** ?! :hitwall:
This man is totally insane :mad:
Freaking moron, talking about nuclear war like its a game....

Should blame those $hit TV stations too who have asked him these questions.
 
.
I gave an example based on what India has done before. China was neutralized for a successful war with Pakistan.
Okay, but that example no longer applies because the world has changed. Anyways, my point still stands, the interview should never have been conducted.
 
.
Thankyou for telling me your facts. I am sure that the engineers, analysts and scientists in India also based their decisions on as sound principles as yours.

But just as precaution, I will base my trust on numbers actually crunched in India.

Sure you can crunch on any shit you want .. But when the mushrooooom hits the shit .. It will be crunching u .. N trust me nothing will be left.. South Asia will be one mighty *** desert..
 
.
My comprehension skills are a little overmatch for your jingoism. All Pakistan has to do is to destroy the Indian wheatbelt, the rest will starve to death, those who remain will die out of radiation inflicted cancer.
After spending years on PDF you will know 1 thing Indians are worst at discussions, He Thinks Nukes are some fireworks
Even Pakistan doesn't fire a single Nuke and India Nukes Pakistan all major Cities , India will face consequences , cz of fallout , radiation of land , water list goes on and on ..... If this trully happens Not only the Pakistan or India but whole world will have to face the consequences of this stupid mistake
 
. . .
Okay, but that example no longer applies because the world has changed.
Yes, it no longer applies. But as time changes, opportunities also change. So can another measure be used to neutralize China. That is the question that today's analysts in MoD should ask and I am sure have asked and prepared for. The goal remains the same, the means change.

Anyways, my point still stands, the interview should never have been conducted.
I disagree. I think everyone has the right to air their views and should air their views.

Better to know what everyone is thinking and make an informed choice than be led astray by guile and lack of information.
 
.
I gave an example based on what India has done before. China was neutralized for a successful war with Pakistan.

China and Pakistan weren't allied back than nor did the nuclear paradigm exist.


You have full rights to disagree with what he says and implies, but you do not have the right to say what he did not.

You drew the wrong conclusion and I put forth exactly where you concluded the wrong things. You disagree with what he says, you can feel that he is wrong on what he says, but you cannot change what he said based on your 'interpretation'.

Meh..your capability even at full capacity is doubted by various analysts here. So there really is no point in reiterating this.

That again is your Jingoism playing up.

Fact 1 | Pakistan surges ahead of India in nuclear stockpile: Report - The Times of India

Fact 2 | India-Pakistan nuclear war could 'end human civilisation' - Telegraph

Fact 3 | Study: Two Billion Could Starve in Event of 'Limited' Nuclear War | Global Security Newswire | NTI

Fact 4 | All Indians would be DEAD.
 
.
The last time India became aggressive was after the Mumbai attacks. You threatened to launch commando raids and surgical strikes in Pakistan Territory. Your jets tried to do so, too, they were intercepted within minutes and escorted back to the border.
 
.
China and Pakistan weren't allied back than nor did the nuclear paradigm exist.
But as time changes, opportunities also change. So can another measure be used to neutralize China. That is the question that today's analysts in MoD should ask and I am sure have asked and prepared for. The goal remains the same, the means keep changing.

And FYI: China was allied and also tried to help..but was constrained because India was ahead in diplomacy and managing the environment.

All these factors that you posted come after the issue I pointed out.
That you drew flawed 'facts' of what he said.
 
.
After spending years on PDF you will know 1 thing Indians are worst at discussions, He Thinks Nukes are some fireworks
Even Pakistan doesn't fire a single Nuke and India Nukes Pakistan all major Cities , India will face consequences , cz of fallout , radiation of land , water list goes on and on ..... If this trully happens Not only the Pakistan or India but whole world will have to face the consequences of this stupid mistake

Most of them are anti fact. Most of them think, its okay since they are going to be reincarnated anyway :D
 
.
Back
Top Bottom