Washington Clears India’s USD 2.1b Purchase of P-8I Patrol Aircraft

[Haanzo]

sorry，i just want to make him safe when he is flying off the ground for several P-8I ,it's good for him to know we have plenty of answers for P-8I

do you know something ---ok anything about sub warfare

point one .......submarines generally oprerate in ENEMY WATERS....WITHOUT ANY ------MIND YOU ANY SUPPORT FROM SURFACE VESSELS or AIRCRAFT

point 2 so we are in no way jeopardizing the p-8Is when they go sub hunting WITH surface vessel backup ,extra air support and submarine hunting the enemy sub...so the relative threat to p-8Is are less infact very less than the existing fleet of combat aircraft

so enemy threat to a sub hunting aircraft is very less if not completely non-existant

 

[Brahm0s]

did i said anything about"McMahon Line",looks like someone feel very guilty about that disputed area..... "war" is always the last choice for china,why are we eager for war when china 's growth is 8% during the recession......it's your choice if "McMahon"is something,it's your choice if you want to increase troops to protect that illegal line,so it will be our call picking the best day to "surprise"you,maybe it's the day our GDP reach to 20 trillion or 40trillion,you just need to make sure india's economy will be fine during the arms race with us,and we don't dream of catching anyone,"ballywood" belongs to india........

Friend you are going off topic again. Just want to answer u about china's 8 percent growth. Are u saying india's growth far behind??? When china would have 40trillion than it might think of war? Do you think by than india would stay same??? And friend what is 'ballywood'? Theres only 'bollywood' i know. Now friend lets get back to topic. If you cant answer how to counter P-8I than simply saying 'i dont know' wont make u small my friend. Cheers

 

[pmukherjee]

India is doing what it should to protect its aircraft carriers, destroyers, frigates, amphibious ships, nuclear subs and shore based installations. The principal threat to these assets is from enemy subs as also aircraft with anti shipping missiles. The Poseidon is the best machine for the job. It is a pure defensive weapon system. I dont understand how someone said that it will be used against Pakistan. Unless Pak subs or surface ships venturs near Indian fleet or shore based installations, the Poseidons can do them no harm.

 

[aimarhenry]

give me a break, "50 years old" Viraat have no value for any sub to hurt......you already crashed half of the carrier plane.......

 

[pmukherjee]

give me a break, "50 years old" Viraat have no value for any sub to hurt......you already crashed half of the carrier plane.......

Yeah talk to us when you have you first aircraft carrier.

 

[Brahm0s]

give me a break, "50 years old" Viraat have no value for any sub to hurt......you already crashed half of the carrier plane.......

Friend this proves u have no knowledge about aircraft carriers. Do u think aircraft carriers sail alone??? Our viraat sail with submarines, destroyers. Having aircraft carrier not a joke. A aircraft carrier never moves alone. If it move alone than its a siting duck. i seen our old viraat moving along with submarines, destroyers with offensive and defensive weapons on it. Anyway friend do ur china even have 50years old aircraft carrier? Oh china making one right? Well india making two aircraft carriers and our vikraam aircraft carrier would be ready by russia. So that makes 3 aircraft carriers which will be protected by its bodyguards 'submarines' and 'destroyers'. Now friend lets get back to topic 'P-8I'. Am fedup replying u on off topic subject. Open a thread where we all can debet on off topic subjects. Thank you friend. Cheers.

 

[aimarhenry]

Yeah talk to us when you have you first aircraft carrier.

i am so jealous......what's this aircraft carrier bring to you......we didn't hear any voice from her when the "Enterprise" swam in indian ocean,is she shy?

 

[aimarhenry]

Friend this proves u have no knowledge about aircraft carriers. Do u think aircraft carriers sail alone??? Our viraat sail with submarines, destroyers. Having aircraft carrier not a joke. A aircraft carrier never moves alone. If it move alone than its a siting duck. i seen our old viraat moving along with submarines, destroyers with offensive and defensive weapons on it. Anyway friend do ur china even have 50years old aircraft carrier? Oh china making one right? Well india making two aircraft carriers and our vikraam aircraft carrier would be ready by russia. So that makes 3 aircraft carriers which will be protected by its bodyguards 'submarines' and 'destroyers'. Now friend lets get back to topic 'P-8I'. Am fedup replying u on off topic subject. Open a thread where we all can debet on off topic subjects. Thank you friend. Cheers.

what's the point having a carrier battle group if the "boss" is useless，3 aircraft carriers?you still wanna keep viraat alive......our "50years old aircraft carrier" is a park for old people to exercise

 

[Trisonics]

i am so jealous......what's this aircraft carrier bring to you......we didn't hear any voice from her when the "Enterprise" swam in indian ocean,is she shy?

The very fact that you are spending your time on this thread tells a lot about the uneasiness China feels about India acquiring an aircraft carrier. 2nd hand, rusty, incapable Indian Navy ..call it what you want but when we set sail on it ( regardless of the expenses..which India dishes out and not China) with our rusty boats, frigates, ships, aircraft, mig 29s, p-8s, LCAs + Su 30s to the south, SUs to the east ..whats the use ?????...our "Boss" is stupid..why waste ur time on a thread like this?all these will not affect the almighty Chinese in any way

 

[graphican]

what's the point having a carrier battle group if the "boss" is useless，3 aircraft carriers?you still wanna keep viraat alive......our "50years old aircraft carrier" is a park for old people to exercise

What I have noticed reading all the posts in this thread is that P-8I has triggered "something" between India and China. I might be wrong but probably Pakistan does not have an answer to this development by the India. Do flying fighter like JF-17/F-16 flying over the marine not give us defense against P-8I? and is there some answer to P-8I from within the submarine? some missile that could get the bird down? To which degree our Subs will be visible to surveillance aircrafts? What could be our answer to this development considering future purchases or indigenous developments?

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

Everyone's common problem and enemy are the Brutish and Yankees.

 

[haawk]

what's the point having a carrier battle group if the "boss" is useless，3 aircraft carriers?you still wanna keep viraat alive......our "50years old aircraft carrier" is a park for old people to exercise

SHOWS YOU HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF BATTLE GROUPS.......

EVEN AIRCRAFTS DONT TRAVEL ALONE ....THEY GO AS A GROUP SO AS TO FENT OF MULTIPLE THREATS .......

 

[Haanzo]

give me a break, "50 years old" Viraat have no value for any sub to hurt......you already crashed half of the carrier plane.......

why are you shying away from replying to my previous post .....now you ve jumped from p-8I to viraat -shows your childishness really answer my previous post coz THIS IS THE P-8I THREAD NO THE CARRIER THREAD

 

[satishkumarcsc]

i am so jealous......what's this aircraft carrier bring to you......we didn't hear any voice from her when the "Enterprise" swam in indian ocean,is she shy?

Well she was busy bombing the Chittagong port to smitherens...that must answer your question...

 

[manojb]

Having AC is like extending ones border. Its floating air base. With combined radar capacity of boats+aircraft is like a circle of ~100 KM moving across ocean from Arabian sea, Indian ocean and bay of bengal and beyond.