Pakistan has no claim in our heritage be it islamic or otherwise may be pashtuns can but their historic parent country is afghanistan mot pak while no punjabi, sindhi, baloch can claim avhievement of mughals since they weren't even 1% in nobility.Its the resources of india and indians which helped created mughal empire.
And for us taj has no cultural value only economical,its ddesign may have some hindu inputs but its a persian architecture,i have seen some foolish indian muslims doing grave worship there along with some hindus.
Our architectural heritages are rock cut caves, temples pillars and stupas not a mughal graveyard.
I don't understand why pakis having gaandburn here,its our property those turks used our money to build/modernize that temple. it's not your concern.
also what happened to everything inside Pakistan is **** history? just like
@Atanz stay with your IVC dust sites
Wrong again Buddhism was never a dominant religion except the upper reaches which had historical ties with buddhist tibet.
There are conversion even 100 years back,The valley and jammu was a hindu dominated regions before islam.
Iqbal ancestors were hindu pandits, Shaiqh Abdullah/farrukh abdullah had hindu Kaul ancestry who converted in 1897 ~.
There are several hindu caste names still retained by converted muslims like matto.
If kashmir valley or jammu was buddhist majority then there would be buddhist archeological remains not hindu which are still dotted the landscape of kashmir.
Kashmir was mostly Buddhist by the time Islam had arrived.
Even so, Hinduism is not a race but an ideology and religion.
Here we are taking india as subjective term or rather a political entity so off course majority of indians have nothing in common with punjabis.
Just like a pakistani kashmiri has nothing to do with sindhi both racially and culturally except for the religion.
Punjabis look and behave nothing like Indians; although they have SLIGHT resemblance to Sikhs - that doesnt mean much.