What's new

Was Einstein wrong?

Nobody likes tensor mathematics. I completely understand. Could you point me towards these more elegant theories that explain the same phenomena. Cheers.

Tensor-vector-scalar gravity theory is one: Tensor–vector–scalar gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quantum gravity: Euclidean quantum gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Noncommutative field theory: Noncommutative quantum field theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

These are all pretty sophisticated theories that, personally, I only can tell that they are different than relativity. This is the realm of specialists. If I had to guess, Prof. Wu developed a new theory of quantum gravity on an Euclidian geometry, hence what he means by flat space-time.

There is also a theory that I personally find interesting: gravity as an emergent phenomena.

Entropic gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Induced gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Tensor-vector-scalar gravity theory is one: Tensor–vector–scalar gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quantum gravity: Euclidean quantum gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Noncommutative field theory: Noncommutative quantum field theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

These are all pretty sophisticated theories that, personally, I only can tell that they are different than relativity. This is the realm of specialists. If I had to guess, Prof. Wu developed a new theory of quantum gravity on an Euclidian geometry, hence what he means by flat space-time.

There is also a theory that I personally find interesting: gravity as an emergent phenomena.

Entropic gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Induced gravity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am aware of the theory of entropic gravity. Purely by chance of course, it is not my field. However none of these theories have had to stand up to scrutiny.

Gravity is as of yet an under explained phenomenon. Einstein believed that space-time was curved which caused propagated gravity in the form of waves. All of these theories are only competing in that subset of his theory. That is not what I was asking for. I am asking for a theory which matches Einstein's general theory of relativity for the entire gamut of relativistic questions.
 
.
Einstein is right. space is curved, time varies on speed. that is proven.
 
.
I am aware of the theory of entropic gravity. Purely by chance of course, it is not my field. However none of these theories have had to stand up to scrutiny.

Gravity is as of yet an under explained phenomenon. Einstein believed that space-time was curved which caused propagated gravity in the form of waves. All of these theories are only competing in that subset of his theory. That is not what I was asking for. I am asking for a theory which matches Einstein's general theory of relativity for the entire gamut of relativistic questions.

I don't think that exists because nobody will invest money in it. You barely get paid for studying relativity itself. I personally believe that theoretical high energy physics is mostly good for bragging rights and producing socially awkward, ultraconservative professors.
 
.
mNFS3mu.jpg


If universe is 2D and its drifting away from other end , what is pulling or casing the split of the universe who is pulling from other side
 
.
I don't think that exists because nobody will invest money in it. You barely get paid for studying relativity itself. I personally believe that theoretical high energy physics is mostly good for bragging rights and producing socially awkward, ultraconservative professors.

Whatever reason there might be. There is no competitor for Einstein's general theory of relativity.

That's very cynical of you. We should all focus on basic research, I get the feeling you prefer a focus on applied research.
 
.
China now owns this :-)

Einstein1.jpg


Visual China buys Corbis Entertainment
  • AAP
  • JANUARY 23, 2016 1:38PM
Chinese image licensing company Visual China Group says it has acquired the image division and content licensing unit of photo library Corbis Entertainment, owned by Microsoft Corp's co-founder Bill Gates.

The Chinese company signed another deal with media service provider Getty Images to distribute Corbis' images and content to customers, thus bringing in a major photo library and an image distributor to China.

Getty Images would distribute Corbis' content, creating a collection of more than 200 million images and videos and certain archived historical content for creative and editorial use.

Following the sale of its image assets, Corbis will be rebranded and its other businesses will operate under a new brand name.

As per the deal, Visual China's division, Unity Glory, will own and manage the images and motion archives, names and trademarks associated with Corbis Images, Corbis Motion and Veer licensing brands.

The financial terms for the deal were not disclosed.

After a transition period, Getty Images said it would offer Corbis creative stills, Corbis Motion content and Corbis archival and documentary content to its customers outside China.

Corbis Images Sold by Bill Gates to Visual China Group
 
.
Einstein is famous for his theory of time which called the theory of relativity and it's interesting that another famous jewish scientific giant Karl Max is also famous for his own theory of time which called the theory of surplus value.
It's more interesting that both theories are unpractical.
Perhaps we can conclude that jews make no practical contribtion to human mankind and they are only machines to earn money.
 
.
So maybe we need to restudy particle physics ?

Einstein was a copy cat master (Plagiarizer)

Late 19th-century natural philosophers believed that electromagnetism was more fundamental than Isaac Newton’s laws of motion and that the electromagnetic field itself should provide the origin of mass.


i.e they knew moving electrons gained mass


When other scientist did their work they released the research with "references" and thank you notes to previous scientist however Einstein did not showed references to work already proven or close to proven by top scientist of the time

In 1881 J. J. Thomson, later a discoverer of the electron, made the first attempt to demonstrate how this might come about by explicitly calculating the magnetic field generated by a moving charged sphere and showing that the field in turn induced a mass into the sphere itself.






220px-Hasenoehrl.jpg

One of the more plausible precursors to E = mc2 is attributed to Fritz Hasenöhrl, a physics professor at the University of Vienna. In a 1904 paper Hasenöhrl clearly wrote down the equation E = 3/8mc2.

He calculated that the motion adds a mass of 3/8c2 times the radiant energy


220px-Oheaviside.jpg

1889 English physicist Oliver Heaviside simplified his work to show that the effective mass should be m = (4⁄3) E / c2

230px-Henri_Poincar%C3%A9-2.jpg

Poincaré concluded that the electromagnetic field energy of an electromagnetic wave behaves like a fictitious fluid ("fluide fictif") with a mass density of E/c2

One naturally wonders whether Einstein knew of Hasenöhrl’s work. It is difficult to believe that he did not, given that the bulk of the prize-winning trilogy appeared in the most prominent journal of the day

Equally surprising is that although Einstein was the first to propose the correct relationship, E = mc2, he didn’t actually prove it, at least according to his own special relativity

(Note all other scientist proposed a equation and were trying to prove their equation Einstine just took the idea and it was self solvable he did not bother showing world the proof of his work)

Yet ... here we are celebrating him


Nor he invented the Nuclear bomb
The Manhattan Project began modestly in 1939, but grew to employ more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion (about $26 billion in 2016 dollars). Over 90% of the cost was for building factories and producing the fissile materials, with less than 10% for development and production of the weapons. Research and production took place at more than 30 sites across the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada.
Thomson discovered mass to charge ratio . He did great contribution but he was more like a experimental scientist and he was a great teacher.
He did not create any groundbreaking theory like Einstein.
 
.
Wukong (The Monkey King) attempts to contribute for a solution of the mystery:

China’s dark-matter satellite launches era of space science
Monkey King is first in a line of Chinese space missions focused on scientific discovery.

17 December 2015

http://www.nature.com/news/china-s-dark-matter-satellite-launches-era-of-space-science-1.19059


WEB_Xinhua-via-Eyevine_488177345.jpg



" From Earth’s orbit, the craft aims to detect high-energy particles and γ-rays. Physicists think that dark matter — a substance thought to make up 85% of the Universe’s matter but so far observed only through its gravitational effects — could reveal itself by producing such cosmic rays as its constituent particles annihilate.

Wukong, officially called the Dark Matter Particle Explorer (DAMPE), is also notable for being the first in a series of five space-science missions to emerge from the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Strategic Priority Program on Space Science, which kicked off in 2011. "


...


"The experiment will also test whether a quantum connection can be set up between a ground station and the satellite and used to ‘teleport’ information instantly and securely. Previously, such experiments have transmitted photons on Earth through optic fibres or air, and over much shorter distances. The eventual goal is to create a global quantum-communications network, says Anton Zeilinger, a physicist at the University of Vienna who is collaborating with Pan on the quantum satellite. By pushing the limits of quantum entanglement, Pan says, the satellite may also help to solve fundamental mysteries about the Universe, such as how to unite quantum mechanics with Einstein’s theory of general relativity."
.
 
.
Einstein is famous for his theory of time which called the theory of relativity and it's interesting that another famous jewish scientific giant Karl Max is also famous for his own theory of time which called the theory of surplus value.
It's more interesting that both theories are unpractical.
Perhaps we can conclude that jews make no practical contribtion to human mankind and they are only machines to earn money.
Einstein was great scientist and his theory is practical .
You can not deny all his theory just because you do not see the time travel machine.

I am aware of the theory of entropic gravity. Purely by chance of course, it is not my field. However none of these theories have had to stand up to scrutiny.

Gravity is as of yet an under explained phenomenon. Einstein believed that space-time was curved which caused propagated gravity in the form of waves. All of these theories are only competing in that subset of his theory. That is not what I was asking for. I am asking for a theory which matches Einstein's general theory of relativity for the entire gamut of relativistic questions.
For now , we have 4 fundamental forces : gravity , electromagnetic,the weak force,the strong force .
Gravity has graviton, e force has photon, the strong nuclear force has gluon.
We are living in the fields of those forces .

And Einstein tried to unify those force fields to one force field which will explain all the phenomenon .

He tried and he failed but modern physics is running in the same direction .
 
Last edited:
.
Einstein was great scientist and his theory is practical .
You can not deny all his theory just because you do not see the time travel machine.


For now , we have 4 fundamental forces : gravity , electromagnetic,the weak force,the strong force .
Gravity has graviton, e force has photon, the strong nuclear force has gluon.
We are living in the fields of those forces .

And Einstein tried to unify those force fields to one force field which will explain all the phenomenon .

He tried and he failed but modern physics is running in the same direction .

We should not think like a KMT lovingTaiwanese. Those people were meant for failure in life.
 
.
Einstein was great scientist and his theory is practical .
You can not deny all his theory just because you do not see the time travel machine.


For now , we have 4 fundamental forces : gravity , electromagnetic,the weak force,the strong force .
Gravity has graviton, e force has photon, the strong nuclear force has gluon.
We are living in the fields of those forces .

And Einstein tried to unify those force fields to one force field which will explain all the phenomenon .

He tried and he failed but modern physics is running in the same direction .

Gravitons have not been proven to exist as of yet. Gravity as a result of the curvature of space-time is not yet a proven concept.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom